IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ulr/wpaper/dt-08-25.html

Social Desirability Bias: Experimental Evidence on Reporting Parental Practices

Author

Listed:
  • Karina Colombo

    (European University Institute)

  • Elisa Failache

    (Universidad de la República (Uruguay). Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y de Administración. Instituto de Economía)

Abstract

We analyze social desirability bias in the reporting of parenting practices through survey questions. We develop a method to experimentally identify this bias by purposely inducing social desirability in questions on feeding practices through a random information provision on best practices. Our results show a treatment effect of -0.160 standard deviations in the reporting of children ultra-processed food consumption, in line with the presence of social desirability bias. We find a larger bias for women, less educated individuals, caregivers that believe child development is not malleable to parental investment, and those with risk preferences above the median. Although the Marlowe-Crowne scale positively correlates with our experimental measure of social desirability bias, we show that an heterogeneous effect analysis by this variable does not fully remove the issue.

Suggested Citation

  • Karina Colombo & Elisa Failache, 2025. "Social Desirability Bias: Experimental Evidence on Reporting Parental Practices," Documentos de Trabajo (working papers) 25-08, Instituto de Economía - IECON.
  • Handle: RePEc:ulr:wpaper:dt-08-25
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12008/50005
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tan, Ming T. & Tian, Guo-Liang & Tang, Man-Lai, 2009. "Sample Surveys With Sensitive Questions: A Nonrandomized Response Approach," The American Statistician, American Statistical Association, vol. 63(1), pages 9-16.
    2. Stefano DellaVigna & John A. List & Ulrike Malmendier, 2012. "Testing for Altruism and Social Pressure in Charitable Giving," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 127(1), pages 1-56.
    3. Czura, Kristina & Menzel, Andreas & Miotto, Martina, 2024. "Improved menstrual health and the workplace: An RCT with female Bangladeshi garment workers," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    4. Mummolo, Jonathan & Peterson, Erik, 2019. "Demand Effects in Survey Experiments: An Empirical Assessment," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 113(2), pages 517-529, May.
    5. Antonella Bandiera & Lelys I. Dinarte Diaz & Juan Miguel Jimenez & Sandra V. Rozo & Maria Micaela Sviatschi, 2022. "Rebel Governance and Development: The Persistent Effects of Guerrillas in El Salvador," NBER Working Papers 30488, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. repec:osf:osfxxx:ew95m_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Bischof, Daniel & Allinger, Tim Lars & Le Corre Juratic, Morgan & Frederiksen, Kristian Vrede Skaaning, 2024. "A Comprehensive Test of the Most Promising Method to Capture Social Desirability Bias in Online Surveys," OSF Preprints ew95m, Center for Open Science.
    8. Chatruc,Marisol Rodriguez & Rozo Villarraga,Sandra Viviana, 2022. "Discrimination Toward Migrants During Crises," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10091, The World Bank.
    9. Armin Falk & Anke Becker & Thomas Dohmen & Benjamin Enke & David B. Huffman & Uwe Sunde, 2017. "Global Evidence on Economic Preferences," NBER Working Papers 23943, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Bhalotra, Sonia & Delavande, Adeline & Font-Gilabert, Paulino & Maselko, Joanna, 2020. "Maternal investments in children: the role of expected effort and returns," ISER Working Paper Series 2020-03, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    11. Bandiera,Antonella Agostina & Dinarte Diaz,Lelys Ileana & Jimenez,Juan Miguel & Rozo Villarraga,Sandra Viviana & Sviatschi,Maria Micaela, 2022. "Rebel Governance and Development: The Persistent Effects of Guerrillas in El Salvador," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10222, The World Bank.
    12. Alex Armand & Britta Augsburg & Antonella Bancalari & Kalyan Kumar Kameshwara, 2021. "Countering misinformation with targeted messages: Experimental evidence using mobile phones," IFS Working Papers W21/27, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    13. Armin Falk & Anke Becker & Thomas Dohmen & Benjamin Enke & David Huffman & Uwe Sunde, 2018. "Global Evidence on Economic Preferences," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 133(4), pages 1645-1692.
    14. Diva Dhar & Tarun Jain & Seema Jayachandran, 2022. "Reshaping Adolescents' Gender Attitudes: Evidence from a School-Based Experiment in India," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 112(3), pages 899-927, March.
    15. Kuhn, Patrick M. & Vivyan, Nick, 2022. "The Misreporting Trade-Off Between List Experiments and Direct Questions in Practice: Partition Validation Evidence from Two Countries," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 30(3), pages 381-402, July.
    16. Daniel S. Hamermesh, 2013. "Six Decades of Top Economics Publishing: Who and How?," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 51(1), pages 162-172, March.
    17. Lelys I. Dinarte Diaz & Saravana Ravindran & Manisha Shah & Shawn M. Powers & Helen Baker-Henningham, 2023. "Violent Discipline and Parental Behavior: Short- and Medium-term Effects of Virtual Parenting Support to Caregivers," NBER Working Papers 31338, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    18. Rebecca Dizon-Ross & Seema Jayachandran, 2022. "Improving Willingness-to-Pay Elicitation by Including a Benchmark Good," AEA Papers and Proceedings, American Economic Association, vol. 112, pages 551-555, May.
    19. Espinosa, Miguel & Rondon, Carlos & Romero, Mauricio, 2012. "The use of mathematics in economics and its effect on a scholar's academic career," MPRA Paper 41341, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Leonardo Bursztyn & Georgy Egorov & Stefano Fiorin, 2020. "From Extreme to Mainstream: The Erosion of Social Norms," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 110(11), pages 3522-3548, November.
    21. Blair, Graeme & Imai, Kosuke, 2012. "Statistical Analysis of List Experiments," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(1), pages 47-77, January.
    22. Jennifer A. Heerwig & Brian J. McCabe, 2009. "Education and Social Desirability Bias: The Case of a Black Presidential Candidate," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 90(3), pages 674-686, September.
    23. Stefano Dellavigna & John A. List & Ulrike Malmendier & Gautam Rao, 2017. "Voting to Tell Others," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 84(1), pages 143-181.
    24. repec:feb:framed:0087 is not listed on IDEAS
    25. Jonathan de Quidt & Johannes Haushofer & Christopher Roth, 2018. "Measuring and Bounding Experimenter Demand," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 108(11), pages 3266-3302, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Angerer, Silvia & Glätzle-Rützler, Daniela & Lergetporer, Philipp & Rittmannsberger, Thomas, 2024. "Beliefs about social norms and gender-based polarization of COVID-19 vaccination readiness," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    2. Karina Colombo & Elisa Failache, 2025. "Screen Exposure in Early Childhood: an Experiment on Parental Practices and Beliefs," Documentos de Trabajo (working papers) 25-09, Instituto de Economía - IECON.
    3. Alain Cohn & Tobias Gesche & Michel André Maréchal, 2022. "Honesty in the Digital Age," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(2), pages 827-845, February.
    4. Gagnon, Nickolas, 2024. "On your own side of the fence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    5. Capezzone, Tommaso & Conzo, Pierluigi & Fuochi, Giulia & Zotti, Roberto & Anfossi, Laura & Mosso, Cristina Onesta, 2025. "We care, but delegate: Climate disasters and climate migration trigger concern, normative beliefs, and altruism – but not cooperation," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis. Working Papers 202511, University of Turin.
    6. Lara Bartels & Madeline Werthschulte, 2025. "‘More Bang for the Buck’? Experimental Evidence on the Mechanisms of an Energy Efficiency Subsidy," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 88(3), pages 631-654, March.
    7. Löschel, Andreas & Rodemeier, Matthias & Werthschulte, Madeline, 2023. "Can self-set goals encourage resource conservation? Field experimental evidence from a smartphone app," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    8. Georgarakos, Dimitris & Kim, Kwang Hwan & Coibion, Olivier & Shim, Myungkyu & Lee, Myunghwan Andrew & Gorodnichenko, Yuriy & Kenny, Geoff & Han, Seowoo & Weber, Michael, 2025. "How costly are business cycle volatility and inflation? A Vox Populi approach," CEPR Discussion Papers 20088, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    9. Pol Campos-Mercade & Claes Ek & Magnus Soderberg & Florian H. Schneider, 2025. "Social Preferences and Environmental Externalities," CESifo Working Paper Series 11895, CESifo.
    10. Battisti, Michele & Kauppinen, Ilpo & Rude, Britta, 2024. "Breaking the silence: The effects of online social movements on gender-based violence," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    11. Berger, Lara Marie & Kerkhof, Anna & Mindl, Felix & Münster, Johannes, 2025. "Debunking “fake news” on social media: Immediate and short-term effects of fact-checking and media literacy interventions," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    12. Eszter Czibor & David Jimenez‐Gomez & John A. List, 2019. "The Dozen Things Experimental Economists Should Do (More of)," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 86(2), pages 371-432, October.
    13. Ronconi, Lucas, 2019. "From Citizen's Rights to Civic Responsibilities," IZA Discussion Papers 12457, IZA Network @ LISER.
    14. Gianmarco Daniele & Andrea F.M. Martinangeli & Francesco Passarelli & Willem Sas & Lisa Windsteiger, 2023. "Externalities and the Erosion of Trust," CESifo Working Paper Series 10474, CESifo.
    15. Campos-Mercade, Pol & Meier, Armando N. & Schneider, Florian H. & Wengström, Erik, 2021. "Prosociality predicts health behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    16. Christian König-Kersting, 2024. "On the robustness of social norm elicitation," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 10(2), pages 531-543, December.
    17. Katharina Werner, 2019. "The Role of Information for Public Preferences on Education – Evidence from Representative Survey Experiments," ifo Beiträge zur Wirtschaftsforschung, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 82, April.
    18. Lara Berger & Anna Kerkhof & Felix Mindl & Johannes Münster, 2023. "Debunking "Fake News" on Social Media: Short-Term and Longer-Term Effects of Fact Checking and Media Literacy Interventions," ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series 262, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
    19. Julio Elías & Nicola Lacetera & Mario Macis, 2026. "Is the Price Right? The Role of Economic Trade-Offs in Explaining Reactions to Price Surges," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 72(3), pages 1814-1834, March.
    20. Leonardo Bursztyn & Ingar K. Haaland & Aakaash Rao & Christopher P. Roth, 2020. "Disguising Prejudice: Popular Rationales as Excuses for Intolerant Expression," NBER Working Papers 27288, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C93 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Field Experiments
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • D91 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ulr:wpaper:dt-08-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lorenza Pérez (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ierauuy.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.