Bounded Rationality in Principal‐Agent Relationships
We conducted six treatments of a standard moral hazard experiment with hidden action. All treatments had identical Nash equilibria. However, the behavior in all treatments and periods was inconsistent with established agency theory (Nash equilibrium). In the early periods of the experiment, behavior differed significantly between treatments. This difference largely vanished in the final periods. We used logit equilibrium (LE) as a device to grasp boundedly rational behavior and found the following: (1) LE predictions are much closer to subjects’ behavior in the laboratory; (2) LE probabilities of choosing between strategies and experimental behavior show remarkably similar patterns; and (3) profit‐maximizing contract offers according to the LE are close to those derived from regressions.
|Date of creation:||2012|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Julius-Albert-Str. 2, 38678 Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Germany|
Phone: +49 5323 727625
Fax: +49 5323 727639
Web page: http://www.wiwi.tu-clausthal.de/abteilungen/volkswirtschaftslehre/
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tuc:tucewp:0006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Janis Kesten-Kühne)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.