A note on the identification in two equations probit model with dummy endogenous regressor
This paper deals with the question whether exclusion restrictions on the exogenous regressors are necessary to identify two equation probit models with endogenous dummy regressor. Contradictory opinions have been exposed in the literature on the necessity of an exclusion restriction. Wilde (2000) argued that an exclusion restriction is not necessary, and proposed a simple criterion for identi fication in this model. We contradict his result, and show how the inherent incompleteness of the model leads to failure of (point) identi cation. We provide an exact identification proof when an exclusion restriction is available.
|Date of creation:||14 Oct 2013|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: 150 St. George Street, Toronto, Ontario|
Phone: (416) 978-5283
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Heckman, James J, 1978.
"Dummy Endogenous Variables in a Simultaneous Equation System,"
Econometric Society, vol. 46(4), pages 931-59, July.
- James J. Heckman, 1977. "Dummy Endogenous Variables in a Simultaneous Equation System," NBER Working Papers 0177, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Wilde, Joachim, 2000. "Identification of multiple equation probit models with endogenous dummy regressors," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 69(3), pages 309-312, December.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tor:tecipa:tecipa-503. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (RePEc Maintainer)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.