IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/tas/wpaper/29995609.html

Critical Role of Trust in Sustainable Investing

Author

Abstract

Catastrophic news of floods, wildfires, record temperatures and rising sea levels highlight the urgent need to support and fund sustainable business practices. However, despite high profile climate action initiatives (e.g., those from COP 28), capital allocation towards positive environmental, social and governance (ESG) practices still represents less than a third of global funds under management. The barriers to making the necessary shift towards environmental and social progress include a lack of trust in investment professionals and products. In particular, our aversion to betrayal holds us back from trusting and engaging in sustainable investments. This aversion is understandable given the risk of greenwashing and corporate failure in accurate reporting on ESG metrics. This research article develops an innovative adaptation of the behavioural trust game to the context of sustainable investing. We measure the extent of trust and trustworthiness in association with sustainable investing amongst the professional investment community—including institutional portfolio managers, investment advisors, and ESG rating agencies. We conduct a trust experiment and test the responses directly and through regression analysis. The results show trust is higher in the context of sustainable investment decision making than normally occurs in trust experiments. Our results also indicate that trust and trustworthiness influence sustainable investment preferences. While trust was not directly reflected in participants’ own sustainable allocations, it was a strong predictor of the allocations they made for others. Trustworthiness also had a positive effect on sustainable investing choices. Although preliminary, we believe this study may contribute to our understanding of trust issues in association with sustainable investing. In particular, these findings lay a foundation for future empirical research to enhance trust in investment decision-making. We hope this research will lead to the creation of genuine trust. However, we also note that this will require change in the industry—e.g., ethical conduct, transparency, and a demonstrated commitment to responsible investing.

Suggested Citation

  • Kent, Danielle & Daugaard, Dan & Yang, Ruby (Dan), 2025. "Critical Role of Trust in Sustainable Investing," Working Papers 2025-06, University of Tasmania, Tasmanian School of Business and Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:tas:wpaper:29995609
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://figshare.utas.edu.au/ndownloader/files/57458797/2
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ernst Fehr, 2009. "On The Economics and Biology of Trust," Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press, vol. 7(2-3), pages 235-266, 04-05.
    2. Johnson, Noel D. & Mislin, Alexandra A., 2011. "Trust games: A meta-analysis," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 865-889.
    3. Maximilian Germann & Lukas Mertes & Martin Weber & Benjamin Loos, 2025. "Trust and delegated investing: a Money Doctors experiment," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 29(1), pages 75-102.
    4. Dan Daugaard, 2020. "Emerging new themes in environmental, social and governance investing: a systematic literature review," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(2), pages 1501-1530, June.
    5. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-12-2019-4320 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. John Millar, 2021. "The gilded path: capital, habitus and illusio in the fund management field," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 34(8), pages 1906-1931, May.
    7. Burke, Jeremy & Hung, Angela A., 2021. "Trust and financial advice," Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(1), pages 9-26, January.
    8. Nadine Strauß & Jonathan Krakow & Marc Chesney, 2023. "It’s the news, stupid! The relationship between news attention, literacy, trust, greenwashing perceptions, and sustainable finance investment in Switzerland," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 1480-1505, October.
    9. Higgins, Colin & Tang, Samuel & Stubbs, Wendy, 2020. "On managing hypocrisy: The transparency of sustainability reports," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 395-407.
    10. Berg Joyce & Dickhaut John & McCabe Kevin, 1995. "Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 122-142, July.
    11. Anett Wins & Bernhard Zwergel, 2015. "Private ethical fund investors across countries and time: a survey-based review," Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 7(4), pages 379-411, November.
    12. Anett Wins & Bernhard Zwergel, 2015. "Private ethical fund investors across countries and time: a survey-based review," Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 7(4), pages 379-411, November.
    13. Gutsche, Gunnar & Wetzel, Heike & Ziegler, Andreas, 2023. "Determinants of individual sustainable investment behavior - A framed field experiment," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 491-508.
    14. Sakis Kotsantonis & George Serafeim, 2019. "Four Things No One Will Tell You About ESG Data," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 31(2), pages 50-58, June.
    15. Bohnet, Iris & Zeckhauser, Richard, 2004. "Trust, risk and betrayal," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 55(4), pages 467-484, December.
    16. Huber, Christoph & Huber, Jürgen & Kirchler, Michael, 2021. "Market shocks and professionals’ investment behavior – Evidence from the COVID-19 crash," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    17. Amisha Gupta & Shumalini Goswami, 2024. "Behavioral perspective on sustainable finance: nudging investors toward SRI," Asian Journal of Economics and Banking, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 8(3), pages 366-390, June.
    18. John Holland, 2016. "A behavioural theory of the fund management firm," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(11), pages 1004-1039, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martin G. Kocher, 2015. "How Trust in Social Dilemmas Evolves with Age," CESifo Working Paper Series 5447, CESifo.
    2. Bejarano, Hernán & Gillet, Joris & Rodriguez-Lara, Ismael, 2021. "Trust and trustworthiness after negative random shocks," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    3. Kim, Jeongbin & Putterman, Louis & Zhang, Xinyi, 2022. "Trust, Beliefs and Cooperation: Excavating a Foundation of Strong Economies," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    4. Roxanne Kovacs & Maurice Dunaiski & Matteo M. Galizzi & Gianluca Grimalda & Rafael Hortala‐Vallve & Fabrice Murtin & Louis Putterman, 2024. "The determinants of trust: findings from large, representative samples in six OECD countries," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 91(364), pages 1521-1552, October.
    5. El Bialy, Nora & Nicklisch, Andreas & Voigt, Stefan, 2017. "Risk-taking, Trust, and Traumatization of Refugees in Germany – A Field Experiment," VfS Annual Conference 2017 (Vienna): Alternative Structures for Money and Banking 168221, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    6. Murnighan, J. Keith & Wang, Long, 2016. "The social world as an experimental game," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 80-94.
    7. Manapat, Michael L. & Nowak, Martin A. & Rand, David G., 2013. "Information, irrationality, and the evolution of trust," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 90(S), pages 57-75.
    8. Chen Li & Uyanga Turmunkh & Peter P. Wakker, 2019. "Trust as a decision under ambiguity," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 22(1), pages 51-75, March.
    9. Andres Barinas-Forero, 2024. "Why should my group trust yours? Collective trust and trustworthiness under Economic Shocks," Documentos CEDE 21170, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    10. Cox, James C. & Kerschbamer, Rudolf & Neururer, Daniel, 2016. "What is trustworthiness and what drives it?," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 197-218.
    11. Sonsino, Doron & Shifrin, Max & Lahav, Eyal, 2016. "Disentangling trust from risk-taking: Triadic approach," MPRA Paper 80095, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Liu, Zhuo & Wang, Juan & Li, Xiaopeng, 2024. "Evolutionary dynamics of networked N-player trust games with exclusion strategy," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    13. Schniter, E. & Shields, T.W. & Sznycer, D., 2020. "Trust in humans and robots: Economically similar but emotionally different," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    14. Dilger, Alexander & Müller, Julia & Müller, Michael, 2017. "Is trustworthiness written on the face?," Discussion Papers of the Institute for Organisational Economics 2/2017, University of Münster, Institute for Organisational Economics.
    15. Sofianos, Andis, 2022. "Self-reported & revealed trust: Experimental evidence," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    16. Zubair, Maria & Khanum, Ayesha & Nasir, Marjan, 2018. "Transfer Of Behavioral Traits From Parents To Children: An Experimental Approach," MPRA Paper 92121, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Suchon, Rémi & Villeval, Marie Claire, 2019. "The effects of status mobility and group identity on trust," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 430-463.
    18. Bogliacino, Francesco & Codagnone, Cristiano, 2021. "Microfoundations, behaviour, and evolution: Evidence from experiments," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 372-385.
    19. Michal Bauer & Nathan Fiala & Ian Levely, 2018. "Trusting Former Rebels: An Experimental Approach to Understanding Reintegration after Civil War," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 128(613), pages 1786-1819, August.
    20. Francesco Bogliacino & Gianluca Grimalda & Laura Jiménez & Daniel Reyes Galvis & Cristiano Codagnone, 2022. "Trust and trustworthiness after a land restitution program: lab-in-the-field evidence from Colombia," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 135-161, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tas:wpaper:29995609. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oscar Pavlov (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dutasau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.