IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sek/iacpro/2804932.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Economic Impacts of the Change in Sectoral Water Use in Maricopa County, Arizona: Modified Input-Output Approach

Author

Listed:
  • James Yoo

    (California Baptist University)

Abstract

This paper investigates the impact of change in sectoral water supply on employment in Maricopa County, Arizona using input-output model. The main contribution of this study is two-fold. First, we generate a database on water use by water source: surface water and groundwater. Second, we develop a modified input-output model that captures the economic impact of substitution in water use from surface to ground water due to variation in the cost of water supply.The study exercises two water supply change scenarios. Scenario I assumes that the total water supply/use decreases by 1% but the reduction comes only from surface water use, holding groundwater use constant. Scenario II assumes that surface water supply/use in all sectors decreases by 1%, and the reduction in surface water use is replaced by the exact amount of more expensive groundwater. We found that the magnitude of economic impacts depends on consumer?s responsiveness to water price change. When price elasticity of water demand is relatively low (

Suggested Citation

  • James Yoo, 2015. "The Economic Impacts of the Change in Sectoral Water Use in Maricopa County, Arizona: Modified Input-Output Approach," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 2804932, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    • Handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:2804932
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iises.net/proceedings/19th-international-academic-conference-florence/table-of-content/detail?cid=28&iid=144&rid=4932
    File Function: First version, 2015
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kinnaman, Thomas C., 2011. "The economic impact of shale gas extraction: A review of existing studies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(7), pages 1243-1249, May.
    2. Llop, Maria, 2013. "Water reallocation in the input–output model," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 21-27.
    3. Bairak, Roman I. & Hughes, David W., 1996. "Evaluating The Impacts Of Agricultural Exports On A Regional Economy," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 28(2), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Cordier, Mateo & Pérez Agúndez, José A. & O'Connor, Martin & Rochette, Sébastien & Hecq, Walter, 2011. "Quantification of interdependencies between economic systems and ecosystem services: An input-output model applied to the Seine estuary," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(9), pages 1660-1671, July.
    5. Lichty, Richard W. & Anderson, Curt L., 1985. "Assessing the Value of Water: Some Alternatives," Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, Mid-Continent Regional Science Association, vol. 15(2), pages 1-13.
    6. repec:hal:journl:hal-00835489 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. John C. Bergstrom & H. Ken Cordell & Gregory A. Ashley & Alan E. Watson, 1990. "Economic Impacts of Recreational Spending on Rural Areas: A Case Study," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 4(1), pages 29-39, February.
    8. Velazquez, Esther, 2006. "An input-output model of water consumption: Analysing intersectoral water relationships in Andalusia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 226-240, February.
    9. Babcock, Michael W. & Leatherman, John C., 2011. "Methodology for Measuring Output, Value Added, and Employment Impacts of State Highway and Bridge Construction Projects," Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Transportation Research Forum, vol. 50(1).
    10. Charles W. Howe & Jeffrey K. Lazo & Kenneth R. Weber, 1990. "The Economic Impacts of Agriculture-to-Urban Water Transfers on the Area of Origin: A Case Study of the Arkansas River Valley in Colorado," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 72(5), pages 1200-1204.
    11. Liang, Sai & Wang, Can & Zhang, Tianzhu, 2010. "An improved input-output model for energy analysis: A case study of Suzhou," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 1805-1813, July.
    12. Andrew C. Worthington, 2010. "Commercial and industrial water demand estimation: Theoretical and methodological guidelines for applied economics research," Discussion Papers in Economics economics:201011, Griffith University, Department of Accounting, Finance and Economics.
    13. Paul, Anthony & Palmer, Karen & Ruth, Matthias & Hobbs, Benjamin F. & Irani, Daraius & Michael, Jeffrey & Chen, Yihsu & Ross, Kimberly & Myers, Erica, 2010. "The role of energy efficiency spending in Maryland's implementation of the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(11), pages 6820-6829, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. James Yoo & Charles Perrings, 2017. "Modeling the short-run costs of changes in water availability in a desert city: a modified input-output approach," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(4), pages 549-564, July.
    2. Abdeslam Boudhar & Said Boudhar & Aomar Ibourk, 2017. "An input–output framework for analysing relationships between economic sectors and water use and intersectoral water relationships in Morocco," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 6(1), pages 1-25, December.
    3. Surís-Regueiro, Juan C. & Santiago, Jose L., 2018. "Assessment of Socioeconomic Impacts Through Physical Multipliers: The Case of Fishing Activity in Galicia (Spain)," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 276-297.
    4. Huang, Wei & Corbett, James J. & Jin, Di, 2015. "Regional economic and environmental analysis as a decision support for marine spatial planning in Xiamen," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 555-562.
    5. Mark T. Kanazawa, 2019. "Transaction Costs in Water Transfers: The issue of local control," Working Papers 2019-01, Carleton College, Department of Economics.
    6. Guangyao Deng & Liujuan Wang & Yanan Song, 2015. "Effect of Variation of Water-Use Efficiency on Structure of Virtual Water Trade - Analysis Based on Input–Output Model," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(8), pages 2947-2965, June.
    7. Virginia Di Nino & Ivan Faiella, 2013. "The �new� non-conventional hydrocarbons: the solution to the energy conundrum?," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 205, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    8. Tapsuwan, Sorada & Peña-Arancibia, Jorge L. & Lazarow, Neil & Albisetti, Melisa & Zheng, Hongxing & Rojas, Rodrigo & Torres-Alferez, Vianney & Chiew, Francis H.S. & Hopkins, Richard & Penton, David J., 2022. "A benefit cost analysis of strategic and operational management options for water management in hyper-arid southern Peru," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    9. Juan C. Surís-Regueiro & José L. Santiago, 2016. "An Input-Output methodological proposal to quantifying socio economic impacts linked to supply shocks," Working Papers 1603, Universidade de Vigo, Departamento de Economía Aplicada.
    10. Rahmani, Javad & Danesh-Yazdi, Mohammad, 2022. "Quantifying the impacts of agricultural alteration and climate change on the water cycle dynamics in a headwater catchment of Lake Urmia Basin," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    11. Johann Audrain & Mateo Cordier & Sylvie Faucheux & Martin O’Connor, 2013. "Écologie territoriale et indicateurs pour un développement durable de la métropole parisienne," Revue d'économie régionale et urbaine, Armand Colin, vol. 0(3), pages 523-559.
    12. Lin, Tun & De Guzman, Franklin, 2007. "Tourism for pro-poor and sustainable growth: economic analysis of tourism projects," MPRA Paper 24994, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Burnett, J. Wesley, 2015. "FOREWORD: Unconventional Oil and Gas Development: Economic, Environmental, and Policy Analysis," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 44(2), pages 1-15, August.
    14. Richard Hornbeck & Pinar Keskin, 2015. "Does Agriculture Generate Local Economic Spillovers? Short-Run and Long-Run Evidence from the Ogallala Aquifer," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 7(2), pages 192-213, May.
    15. Cho, Joongkoo & Hu, Weihong, 2013. "Network-Based Simulation of Air Pollution Emissions Associated with Truck Operations," Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Transportation Research Forum, vol. 52(3).
    16. Lixiao Zhang & Qiuhong Hu & Fan Zhang, 2014. "Input-Output Modeling for Urban Energy Consumption in Beijing: Dynamics and Comparison," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-11, March.
    17. Carlos E. Carpio, & Octavio A. Ramirez, & Tullaya Boonsaeng, 2011. "Potential for Tradable Water Allocation and Rights in Jordan," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 87(4), pages 595-609.
    18. Hansen, Kristiana, 2010. "Water Markets and Water Rights Markets in the Western United States," Western Economics Forum, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 9(2), pages 1-10.
    19. Zhang, Dongmei & Guo, Ping, 2016. "Integrated agriculture water management optimization model for water saving potential analysis," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 5-19.
    20. Ramón Barberán & Julio López-Laborda & Fernando Rodrigo, 2022. "The Perception of Residential Water Tariff, Consumption, and Cost: Evidence of its Determinants Using Survey Data," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(9), pages 2933-2952, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    economic impacts; input-output model; water supply;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C18 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Methodolical Issues: General
    • C67 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Input-Output Models

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:2804932. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klara Cermakova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iises.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.