IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sef/csefwp/747.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Judicial inefficiency and the default of zombie firms

Author

Abstract

Using a large sample of European enterprises, we document that companies’ default probability is significantly larger when they experience negative end-of- the year equity (zombie status) in the year prior to default. Zombie firms are more likely to default in the short run in countries with more efficient judicial insolvency procedures. To establish a causal link between judicial efficiency and the default probability of zombie firms, we exploit a reform of the court districts in Italy that generates exogenous variation in trial lengths. This country-level analysis corroborates the findings of a cleansing effect of judicial efficiency that limits the persistence of zombie firms in the economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Serena Fatica & Tommaso Oliviero & Michela Rancan, 2025. "Judicial inefficiency and the default of zombie firms," CSEF Working Papers 747, Centre for Studies in Economics and Finance (CSEF), University of Naples, Italy.
  • Handle: RePEc:sef:csefwp:747
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.csef.it/WP/wp747.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    default; zombie firms; SMEs; EU-27; judicial efficiency.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G33 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Bankruptcy; Liquidation
    • K22 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Business and Securities Law
    • L25 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Firm Performance
    • O52 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Europe

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sef:csefwp:747. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Maria Carannante (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cssalit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.