IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rif/wpaper/147.html

Green, Yellow, Red: How Personalized Nutrition Feedback Shifts Grocery Purchases

Author

Listed:
  • Koski, Heli
  • Kuikkaniemi, Kai

Abstract

We studied whether personalized nutritional feedback on past grocery purchases shifts subsequent consumer choices. In September 2020, Finland’s largest grocery retailer added a Nutrition Calculator to its digital purchase-history service. The calculator summarizes the nutritional profile of customers’ purchases, evaluates it against national nutrition recommendations, and presents feedback using green, yellow, and red indicators. Using retailer transaction data, we estimate a difference-in-differences event study. Our primary specification compares 9,743 consumers who had used the service for at least six months before the launch of the calculator with a matched control group that had not activated the service. The clearest effect is for sugar-intensive purchases, whose budget share falls by 0.25 percentage points on average and by up to 0.43 percentage points at the peak. The budget share of salt-intensive purchases also declines, although some of this movement predates the launch, making the evidence less conclusive. We found no systematic changes in the budget share of fat-intensive purchases. The effects are most pronounced among women and consumers under the age of 55.

Suggested Citation

  • Koski, Heli & Kuikkaniemi, Kai, 2026. "Green, Yellow, Red: How Personalized Nutrition Feedback Shifts Grocery Purchases," ETLA Working Papers 147, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
  • Handle: RePEc:rif:wpaper:147
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.etla.fi/wp-content/uploads/ETLA-Working-Papers-147.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nano Barahona & Cristóbal Otero & Sebastián Otero, 2023. "Equilibrium Effects of Food Labeling Policies," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 91(3), pages 839-868, May.
    2. John Cawley & Alex Susskind & Barton Willage, 2020. "The Impact of Information Disclosure on Consumer Behavior: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment of Calorie Labels on Restaurant Menus," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(4), pages 1020-1042, September.
    3. Congiu, Luca & Moscati, Ivan, 2022. "A review of nudges: definitions, justifications, effectiveness," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 115134, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Dmitry Taubinsky & Alex Rees-Jones, 2018. "Attention Variation and Welfare: Theory and Evidence from a Tax Salience Experiment," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 85(4), pages 2462-2496.
    5. Heiman, Amir & Lowengart, Oded, 2014. "Calorie information effects on consumers' food choices: Sources of observed gender heterogeneity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(5), pages 964-973.
    6. Schweiger, Elisa B. & Ahlbom, Carl-Philip & Nordfält, Jens & Roggeveen, Anne L. & Grewal, Dhruv, 2023. "In-store endcap projections and their effect on sales," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 99(1), pages 5-16.
    7. Luca Congiu & Ivan Moscati, 2022. "A review of nudges: Definitions, justifications, effectiveness," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(1), pages 188-213, February.
    8. Julie S. Downs & George Loewenstein & Jessica Wisdom, 2009. "Strategies for Promoting Healthier Food Choices," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 99(2), pages 159-164, May.
    9. Jordan Etkin, 2016. "The Hidden Cost of Personal Quantification," Journal of Consumer Research, Oxford University Press, vol. 42(6), pages 967-984.
    10. Justine Hastings & Ryan Kessler & Jesse M. Shapiro, 2021. "The Effect of SNAP on the Composition of Purchased Foods: Evidence and Implications," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 13(3), pages 277-315, August.
    11. Pedro Bordalo & Nicola Gennaioli & Andrei Shleifer, 2013. "Salience and Consumer Choice," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 121(5), pages 803-843.
    12. Hunt Allcott & Judd B. Kessler, 2019. "The Welfare Effects of Nudges: A Case Study of Energy Use Social Comparisons," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 11(1), pages 236-276, January.
    13. Romain Cadario & Pierre Chandon, 2019. "Which Healthy Eating Nudges Work Best? A Meta-Analysis of Field Experiments," Post-Print hal-02111755, HAL.
    14. Evan Polman & Sam J Maglio, 2024. "Nudges Increase Choosing but Decrease Consuming: Longitudinal Studies of the Decoy, Default, and Compromise Effects," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 51(3), pages 542-551.
    15. Bryan Bollinger & Phillip Leslie & Alan Sorensen, 2011. "Calorie Posting in Chain Restaurants," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 3(1), pages 91-128, February.
    16. Sun, Liyang & Abraham, Sarah, 2021. "Estimating dynamic treatment effects in event studies with heterogeneous treatment effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 225(2), pages 175-199.
    17. Delmas, Magali A. & Fischlein, Miriam & Asensio, Omar I., 2013. "Information strategies and energy conservation behavior: A meta-analysis of experimental studies from 1975 to 2012," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 729-739.
    18. Hunt Allcott & Todd Rogers, 2014. "The Short-Run and Long-Run Effects of Behavioral Interventions: Experimental Evidence from Energy Conservation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(10), pages 3003-3037, October.
    19. Cherchye, Laurens & De Rock, Bram & Griffith, Rachel & O’Connell, Martin & Smith, Kate & Vermeulen, Frederic, 2020. "A new year, a new you? Within-individual variation in food purchases," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    20. repec:hal:journl:hal-05393635 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Koski, Heli & Kuikkaniemi, Kai & Pantzar, Mika, 2023. "Do Grocery Feedback Systems Enabling Access to Past Consumption Impact Individual Food Purchase Behavior?," ETLA Working Papers 103, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    2. Miro Mehic, 2026. "How Effective is Nudging in the Long Run? A Meta-Analysis of Pro-Environmental Behavior," Working Papers Dissertations 178, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
    3. Schleich, Joachim & Alsheimer, Sven, 2024. "The relationship between willingness to pay and carbon footprint knowledge: Are individuals willing to pay more to offset their carbon footprint if they learn about its size and distance to the 1.5 °C target?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    4. Wu, Libo & Zhou, Yang, 2025. "Social norms and energy conservation in China," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    5. Huseynov, Samir & Palma, Marco A. & Ahmad, Ghufran, 2021. "Does the magnitude of relative calorie distance affect food consumption?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 530-551.
    6. Papineau, Maya & Rivers, Nicholas, 2022. "Experimental evidence on heat loss visualization and personalized information to motivate energy savings," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    7. Broberg, Thomas & Kažukauskas, Andrius, 2021. "Information policies and biased cost perceptions - The case of Swedish residential energy consumption," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    8. Bonan, J. & Cattaneo, C. & d’Adda, G. & Galliera, A. & Tavoni, M., 2024. "Widening the scope: The direct and spillover effects of nudging water efficiency in the presence of other behavioral interventions," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    9. Fang, Ximeng & Goette, Lorenz & Rockenbach, Bettina & Sutter, Matthias & Tiefenbeck, Verena & Schoeb, Samuel & Staake, Thorsten, 2023. "Complementarities in behavioral interventions: Evidence from a field experiment on resource conservation," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    10. Fang, Hanming & Li, King King & Shen, Peiyao, 2025. "To go electric or to burn coal? A randomized field experiment of informational nudges," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    11. Gabriele Letta & Mario Cesare Nurchis & Luca Salmasi & Gilberto Turati, 2026. "Do vaccination-based access restriction policies curb hesitancy? A comparison between Italy and Spain," DISCE - Working Papers del Dipartimento di Economia e Finanza def153, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimenti e Istituti di Scienze Economiche (DISCE).
    12. Andor, Mark A. & Gerster, Andreas & Peters, Jörg, 2022. "Information campaigns for residential energy conservation," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    13. Alcocer, Christian Diego & Torres, Elman Roman Torres, 2024. "Salience bias: A framework about the importance of prices and budget constraints perceptions," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    14. Jorge Alé-Chilet & Sarah Moshary, 2022. "Beyond Consumer Switching: Supply Responses to Food Packaging and Advertising Regulations," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(2), pages 243-270, March.
    15. Hunt Allcott & Daniel Cohen & William Morrison & Dmitry Taubinsky, 2022. "When do "Nudges" Increase Welfare?," NBER Working Papers 30740, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Goetz, Alexander & Mayr, Harald & Schubert, Renate, 2024. "One thing leads to another: Evidence on the scope and persistence of behavioral spillovers," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    17. Andor, Mark Andreas & Götte, Lorenz & Price, Michael Keith & Schulze Tilling, Anna & Tomberg, Lukas, 2023. "Differences in how and why social comparisons and real-time feedback impact resource use: Evidence from a field experiment," Ruhr Economic Papers 1059, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    18. Ya‐Wen Tseng & Jie‐Yu Yang & Eric S. Lin & Yating Chuang, 2026. "Social comparison and energy conservation: the role of reference groups and room dynamics in a field experiment," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 93(371), pages 801-838, July.
    19. Allais, Olivier & Bazoche, Pascale & Teyssier, Sabrina, 2017. "Getting more people on the stairs: The impact of point-of-decision prompts," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 18-27.
    20. Ross C. Beppler & Daniel C. Matisoff & Matthew E. Oliver, 2023. "Electricity consumption changes following solar adoption: Testing for a solar rebound," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 61(1), pages 58-81, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D12 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • D9 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics
    • I12 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Behavior
    • L86 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Information and Internet Services; Computer Software
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rif:wpaper:147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kaija Hyvönen-Rajecki (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/etlaafi.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.