IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rif/wpaper/113.html

Digitalization and Resilience: Data Assets and Firm Productivity Growth During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Koski, Heli
  • Fornaro, Paolo

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of firm-level investments in data assets on productivity growth during the COVID-19 pandemic, utilizing matched employer-employee data of 13,609 Finnish firms for 2015–2020. Our estimation results indicate that firms with greater pre-pandemic investments in software and database assets and ICT experienced significantly higher labor productivity growth in the first year of the pandemic. Notably, these positive effects are predominantly observed in the service sector, while manufacturing companies did not exhibit statistically significant impacts. Furthermore, our analysis highlights that large service companies with greater investments in data assets demonstrated higher labor productivity growth than their counterparts. We also identify a noteworthy complementarity between a firm’s investments in ICT and databases and employees’ skills, as measured by education level. Interestingly, our empirical findings underscore that firms investing more in data, databases and ICT were statistically significantly more likely to belong to the productivity frontier of their industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Koski, Heli & Fornaro, Paolo, 2024. "Digitalization and Resilience: Data Assets and Firm Productivity Growth During the COVID-19 Pandemic," ETLA Working Papers 113, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
  • Handle: RePEc:rif:wpaper:113
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.etla.fi/wp-content/uploads/ETLA-Working-Papers-113.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Diane Coyle & Wendy Li, 2021. "The Data Economy: Market Size and Global Trade," Economic Statistics Centre of Excellence (ESCoE) Discussion Papers ESCoE DP-2021-09, Economic Statistics Centre of Excellence (ESCoE).
    2. Oikonomou, Myrto & Pierri, Nicola & Timmer, Yannick, 2023. "IT shields: Technology adoption and economic resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    3. Carol Corrado & John Haltiwanger & Daniel Sichel, 2005. "Measuring Capital in the New Economy," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number corr05-1, January.
    4. Daron Acemoglu & Pascual Restrepo, 2020. "Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 128(6), pages 2188-2244.
    5. Federico Biagi, 2013. "ICT and Productivity: A Review of the Literature," JRC Working Papers on Digital Economy 2013-09, Joint Research Centre.
    6. Carol Corrado & John Haltiwanger & Daniel Sichel, 2005. "Introduction to "Measuring Capital in the New Economy"," NBER Chapters, in: Measuring Capital in the New Economy, pages 1-10, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Maryam Farboodi & Laura Veldkamp, 2021. "A Model of the Data Economy," NBER Working Papers 28427, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Nelson Lind & Natalia Ramondo, 2023. "Global Innovation and Knowledge Diffusion," American Economic Review: Insights, American Economic Association, vol. 5(4), pages 494-510, December.
    9. Peter Goodridge & Jonathan Haskel & Harald Edquist, 2022. "We See Data Everywhere Except in the Productivity Statistics," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 68(4), pages 862-894, December.
    10. Thomas Niebel & Fabienne Rasel & Steffen Viete, 2019. "BIG data – BIG gains? Understanding the link between big data analytics and innovation," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(3), pages 296-316, April.
    11. Flavio Calvino & Chiara Criscuolo & Luca Marcolin & Mariagrazia Squicciarini, 2018. "A taxonomy of digital intensive sectors," OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2018/14, OECD Publishing.
    12. Robert Anderton & Vasco Botelho & Paul Reimers, 2023. "Digitalisation and productivity: gamechanger or sideshow?," Discussion Papers 2023-05, University of Nottingham, GEP.
    13. Carol Corrado & Jonathan Haskel & Massimiliano Iommi & Cecilia Jona-Lasinio, 2022. "Measuring data as an asset: Framework, methods and preliminary estimates," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1731, OECD Publishing.
    14. Charles I. Jones & Christopher Tonetti, 2020. "Nonrivalry and the Economics of Data," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 110(9), pages 2819-2858, September.
    15. Daniel Ker & Emanuele Mazzini, 2020. "Perspectives on the value of data and data flows," OECD Digital Economy Papers 299, OECD Publishing.
    16. Robert J. Gordon & Hassan Sayed, 2020. "Transatlantic Technologies: The Role of ICT in the Evolution of U.S. and European Productivity Growth," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 38, pages 50-80, Spring.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kuosmanen, Natalia & Kaitila, Ville & Kuusi, Tero & Kässi, Otto & Maczulskij, Terhi & Pajarinen, Mika, 2025. "Productivity in the Finnish Service Industries: Capital Intensity, Labor Allocation, Digitalization, Offshoring and Generative AI," ETLA Reports 167, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gravina, Antonio Francesco & Foster-McGregor, Neil, 2020. "Automation, globalisation and relative wages: An empirical analysis of winners and losers," MERIT Working Papers 2020-040, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    2. Peter Goodridge & Jonathan Haskel, 2023. "Accounting for the slowdown in UK innovation and productivity," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 90(359), pages 780-812, July.
    3. Carol Corrado & Jonathan Haskel & Massimiliano Iommi & Cecilia Jona-Lasinio & Filippo Bontadini, 2024. "Data, Intangible Capital, and Productivity," NBER Chapters, in: Technology, Productivity, and Economic Growth, pages 193-243, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Josh Martin & Rebecca Riley, 2025. "Productivity measurement: Reassessing the production function from micro to macro," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(1), pages 246-279, February.
    5. Mironov, V. & Kuznetsov, A. & Konovalova, L., 2024. "On the sectoral effects of digitalization based on new indicators by type of economic activity," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 62(1), pages 143-179.
    6. Makridis, Christos A. & Han, Joo Hun, 2021. "Future of work and employee empowerment and satisfaction: Evidence from a decade of technological change," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    7. Anmol Bhandari & Ellen R. McGrattan, 2017. "Sweat Equity in U.S. Private Business," Staff Report 560, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.
    8. Venturini, Francesco, 2022. "Intelligent technologies and productivity spillovers: Evidence from the Fourth Industrial Revolution," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 220-243.
    9. Corrado Carol & Lengermann Paul & Beaulieu J. Joseph & Bartelsman Eric J., 2007. "Sectoral Productivity in the United States: Recent Developments and the Role of IT," German Economic Review, De Gruyter, vol. 8(2), pages 188-210, May.
    10. Jeon, Heesang, 2015. "Knowledge and Contemporary Capitalism in Light of Marx's Value Theory," Thesis Commons g5njk, Center for Open Science.
    11. Raffaella Sadun & Rachel J. Schuh & Jonathan S. Hartley & John Van Reenen & Nicholas Bloom, 2025. "Management and Firm Dynamism," NBER Working Papers 33765, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Ehsan Valavi & Joel Hestness & Newsha Ardalani & Marco Iansiti, 2022. "Time and the Value of Data," Papers 2203.09118, arXiv.org.
    13. Leonard I. Nakamura, 2010. "Intangible Assets And National Income Accounting," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 56(s1), pages 135-155, June.
    14. Daniel Nepelski & Maciej Sobolewski, 2020. "Estimating investments in General Purpose Technologies. The case of AI Investments in Europe," JRC Research Reports JRC118953, Joint Research Centre.
    15. Ye Li, 2018. "Fragile New Economy: The Rise of Intangible Capital and Financial Instability," 2018 Meeting Papers 1189, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    16. Ellen R. McGrattan & Edward C. Prescott, 2010. "Technology Capital and the US Current Account," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 100(4), pages 1493-1522, September.
    17. Roth, Felix & Sen, Ali & Rammer, Christian, 2021. "Intangible Capital and Firm-Level Productivity – Evidence from Germany," Hamburg Discussion Papers in International Economics 9, University of Hamburg, Department of Economics.
    18. repec:cam:camjip:2410 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Xiuying Ma & Fei Jia & Hong Jiang & Xiangyun Xu, 2022. "The Impact of Non-R&D Intangible Capital on TFP Growth: Evidence from Multi-country Industry Level Data," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(4), pages 2890-2910, December.
    20. Siedschlag, Iulia & Vanegas, Juan Duran, 2025. "The effects of investment in education and training on productivity growth in the European Union," Papers WP802, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    21. Daniel Sichel & Eric von Hippel, 2021. "Household Innovation and R&D: Bigger than You Think," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 67(3), pages 639-658, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D22 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Firm Behavior: Empirical Analysis
    • L25 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Firm Performance
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rif:wpaper:113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kaija Hyvönen-Rajecki (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/etlaafi.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.