IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

General Equilibrium Impacts VAT and Corporate Tax in Thailand


  • Benjasak, Chonlakan
  • Bhattarai, Keshab


We construct a CGE model of Thailand in order to assess economy wide impacts of reforms in the value added tax (VAT) and corporate income tax (CIT) on welfare and reallocation of resources across production sectors in the Thai economy. Our model was calibrated to the micro consistent benchmark data set contained in the Input-Output Table published in 2010 by the Office of National Economics and Social Development Board (NESD) with some restructuring into 18 sectors. The general algebraic modelling system (GAMS) was used to estimate the parameters of the model. The findings reveal that aggregate net changes in welfare of 10 percent VAT are better than zero percent VAT. Thus, increasing VAT from 7 to 10 percent becomes desirable policy action on the basis of economy wide welfare analysis because utility from the public services for the households more than compensates their loss of utility due to higher taxes. On the net welfare basis, the decreasing CIT rate from 30 to 20 percent is more preferable policy than 23 percent CIT. This model based analysis is a unique contribution to the current literature on impacts of VAT and corporate income tax in the Thai economy though further scope remains for full impact analysis of comprehensive reforms such as the GST with dynamic model and multi households.

Suggested Citation

  • Benjasak, Chonlakan & Bhattarai, Keshab, 2017. "General Equilibrium Impacts VAT and Corporate Tax in Thailand," MPRA Paper 88816, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 01 Jul 2018.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:88816

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Amir, Hidayat & Asafu-Adjaye, John & Ducpham, Tien, 2013. "The impact of the Indonesian income tax reform: A CGE analysis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 492-501.
    2. Guedhami, Omrane & Kwok, Chuck C.Y. & Shao, Liang, 2017. "Political freedom and corporate payouts," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 514-529.
    3. Muhammad Akram Naseem & Huanping Zhang & Fizzah Malik & Ramiz-Ur-Rehman, 2017. "Capital Structure and Corporate Governance," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 51(1), pages 33-47, January-M.
    4. ., 2017. "Civilizing the corporation," Chapters, in: Approaching Equality, chapter 9, pages 162-188, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Field, Alfred J. & Wongwatanasin, Umaporn, 2007. "Tax policies' impact on output, trade and income in Thailand," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 361-380.
    6. ., 2017. "Corporations in economic development," Chapters, in: A General Theory of Economic Development, chapter 6, pages 104-114, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. Lai Van Vo & Huong Thi Thu Le & Danh Vinh Le & Minh Tuan Phung & Yi-Hsien Wang & Fu-Ju Yang, 2017. "Customer satisfaction and corporate investment policies," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 202-223, March.
    8. ., 2017. "Corporate social responsibility," Chapters, in: Organizational Opportunity and Deviant Behavior, chapter 8, pages 135-158, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. ., 2017. "Neoliberalism and the problem of the corporation," Chapters, in: A Research Agenda for Neoliberalism, chapter 6, pages 103-128, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Bergman, Lars, 1990. "Energy and environmental constraints on growth: A CGE modeling approach," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 671-691.
    11. Richard Blundell, 2009. "Assessing the Temporary VAT Cut Policy in the UK," Fiscal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1), pages 31-38, March.
    12. Jens Matthias Arnold & Bert Brys & Christopher Heady & Åsa Johansson & Cyrille Schwellnus & Laura Vartia, 2011. "Tax Policy for Economic Recovery and Growth," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 121(550), pages 59-80, February.
    13. Lee, Young & Gordon, Roger H., 2005. "Tax structure and economic growth," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(5-6), pages 1027-1043, June.
    14. Ray Barrell & Martin Weale, 2009. "The Economics of a Reduction in VAT," Fiscal Studies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, vol. 30(1), pages 17-30, March.
    15. Al-Amin, Abul Quasem & Jaafar, Abdul Hamid & Siwar, Chamhuri, 2008. "A Computable General Equilibrium Approach To Trade And Environmental Modelling In The Malaysian Economy," MPRA Paper 8772, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Ray Barrell & Martin Weale, 2009. "The Economics of a Reduction in VAT," Fiscal Studies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, vol. 30(1), pages 17-30, March.
    17. Catherine H. Tinsley & James B. Wade & Brian G. M. Main & Charles A. O’Reilly, 2017. "Gender Diversity on U.S. Corporate Boards," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 70(1), pages 160-189, January.
    18. Kelvin K. F. Law & Lillian F. Mills, 2017. "Military experience and corporate tax avoidance," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 141-184, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chonlakan Benjasak & Keshab Bhattarai, 2019. "General Equilibrium Impacts of VAT and Corporate Income Tax in Thailand," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 25(3), pages 263-276, August.
    2. Sarkki, Simo, 2017. "Governance services: Co-producing human well-being with ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 27(PA), pages 82-91.
    3. Lieberman, Alicea & Duke, Kristen E. & Amir, On, 2019. "How incentive framing can harness the power of social norms," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 118-131.
    4. Irfan Ahmed & Claudio Socci & Francesca Severini & Rosita Pretaroli, 2019. "Fiscal policy for households and public budget constraint in Italy," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 36(1), pages 19-35, April.
    5. Jens Matthias Arnold & Bert Brys & Christopher Heady & Åsa Johansson & Cyrille Schwellnus & Laura Vartia, 2011. "Tax Policy for Economic Recovery and Growth," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 121(550), pages 59-80, February.
    6. Björn Falkenhall & Jonas Månsson & Sofia Tano, 2020. "Impact of VAT Reform on Swedish Restaurants: A Synthetic Control Group Approach," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 122(2), pages 824-850, April.
    7. Karol Jan Borowiecki & Trilce Navarrete, 2018. "Fiscal and economic aspects of book consumption in the European Union," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 42(2), pages 309-339, May.
    8. Vesal, Mohammad, 2017. "Stimulus Effect of a Value-added Tax Cut: Evidence from the UK Tax Returns Data," MPRA Paper 101016, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Nadia Belhaj Hassine-Belghith, 2007. "Exporting , Productive Efficiency and Product Quality: An Empirical Analysis Of the Agricultural Sector in the Mediterranean Countries," Working Papers 711, Economic Research Forum, revised 01 Jan 2007.
    10. Thomas Crossley & Hamish Low & Cath Sleeman, 2014. "Using a temporary indirect tax cut as a fiscal stimulus: evidence from the UK," IFS Working Papers W14/16, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    11. Tereza Šinkyříková & Jana Soukopová, 2012. "Impact of standard rate of VAT on tax mix in EU 27," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 60(7), pages 369-378.
    12. Jing Xing, 2011. "Does tax structure affect economic growth? Empirical evidence from OECD countries," Working Papers 1120, Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation.
    13. Alfò, Marco & Carbonari, Lorenzo & Trovato, Giovanni, 2023. "On the effects of taxation on growth: an empirical assessment," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(5), pages 1289-1318, July.
    14. Gechert, Sebastian & Heimberger, Philipp, 2022. "Do corporate tax cuts boost economic growth?," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    15. NANTOB, N'Yilimon, 2014. "Taxation and Economic Growth : An Empirical Analysis on Dynamic Panel Data of WAEMU Countries," MPRA Paper 61370, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 30 Jan 2015.
    16. Andrejovská Alena & Mihóková Lucia & Martinková Slavomíra, 2017. "Meta-analysis categorization of EU countries in the context of corporate income tax," Contaduría y Administración, Accounting and Management, vol. 62(3), pages 1001-1018, Julio-Sep.
    17. Bastianin, Andrea & Castelnovo, Paolo & Florio, Massimo, 2018. "Evaluating regulatory reform of network industries: a survey of empirical models based on categorical proxies," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 115-128.
    18. Kyle McNabb, 2016. "Tax structures and economic growth: New evidence from the Government Revenue Dataset," WIDER Working Paper Series 148, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    19. Gonzalo Fernandez-de-Cordoba & Jose L Torres, 2011. "The Transitory VAT Cut in the UK: A Dynamic General Equilibrium Analysis," Economic Issues Journal Articles, Economic Issues, vol. 16(1), pages 1-18, March.
    20. Colin Davis & Ken‐ichi Hashimoto, 2018. "Corporate Tax Policy And Industry Location With Fully Endogenous Productivity Growth," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 56(2), pages 1136-1148, April.

    More about this item


    Tax Policy; VAT; Thailand’s CGE model;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D58 - Microeconomics - - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium - - - Computable and Other Applied General Equilibrium Models
    • D61 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Allocative Efficiency; Cost-Benefit Analysis
    • H2 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:88816. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.