IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/128947.html

Understanding Fertility Today: Young Couples’ Expectations about the Consequences of Childbearing

Author

Listed:
  • Lu, Kelin
  • Wang, Chao

Abstract

Fertility decisions are forward-looking and made within couples, yet little is known about how young couples perceive the consequences of childbearing. We survey 1,800 respondents from paired Chinese one-child couples and elicit second-birth plans and expectations about life outcomes under alternative fertility choices, including consumption, wages, time burdens, and old-age support. We use these data to estimate a household bargaining model. Wives are more likely than husbands to oppose a second birth. The main driver of this disagreement is not wives' weak bargaining power, but gender differences in preferences over child quantity. Policy simulations show that public childcare, especially when it also reduces motherhood wage penalties, is more effective than cash transfers. The old-age value of children operates more through support in adverse health states than through financial transfers, but an additional child provides only limited extra insurance. These results show the value of measuring the beliefs and trade-offs that shape fertility decisions among current cohorts.

Suggested Citation

  • Lu, Kelin & Wang, Chao, 2026. "Understanding Fertility Today: Young Couples’ Expectations about the Consequences of Childbearing," MPRA Paper 128947, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:128947
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/128947/1/MPRA_paper_128947.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shing-Yi Wang, 2019. "The Labor Supply Consequences of Having a Boy in China," NBER Working Papers 26185, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Gary S. Becker & H. Gregg Lewis, 1974. "Interaction between Quantity and Quality of Children," NBER Chapters, in: Economics of the Family: Marriage, Children, and Human Capital, pages 81-90, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Stefanie Stantcheva, 2023. "How to Run Surveys: A Guide to Creating Your Own Identifying Variation and Revealing the Invisible," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 15(1), pages 205-234, September.
    4. Briggs, Joseph & Caplin, Andrew & Leth-Petersen, Søren & Tonetti, Christopher, 2024. "Identification of Marginal Treatment Effects using Subjective Expectations," CEPR Discussion Papers 18995, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    5. Orazio Attanasio & V’ctor Sancibri‡n & Federica Ambrosio, 2025. "New Measures for Richer Theories: Some Thoughts and an Example," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2477, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    6. Roberto Colarieti & Pierfrancesco Mei & Stefanie Stantcheva, 2024. "The How and Why of Household Reactions to Income Shocks," NBER Working Papers 32191, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Ingvild Almås & Orazio Attanasio & Pamela Jervis, 2024. "Presidential Address: Economics and Measurement: New Measures to Model Decision Making," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 92(4), pages 947-978, July.
    8. Yu Yang & Rongxin He & Ning Zhang & Liming Li, 2023. "Second-Child Fertility Intentions among Urban Women in China: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-16, February.
    9. David E. Bloom & Michael Kuhn & Klaus Prettner, 2024. "Fertility in High-Income Countries: Trends, Patterns, Determinants, and Consequences," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 16(1), pages 159-184, August.
    10. Pierre Lefebvre & Philip Merrigan, 2008. "Child-Care Policy and the Labor Supply of Mothers with Young Children: A Natural Experiment from Canada," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 26(3), pages 519-548, July.
    11. Melissa Schettini Kearney & Phillip B. Levine, 2025. "Why Is Fertility So Low in High Income Countries?," NBER Working Papers 33989, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Christopher Roth & Mirko Wiederholt & Johannes Wohlfart, 2022. "The Effects of Monetary Policy: Theory with Measured Expectations," Sciences Po Economics Publications (main) hal-03878711, HAL.
    13. Peter Andrebriq & Carlo Pizzinelli & Christopher Roth & Johannes Wohlfart, 2022. "Subjective Models of the Macroeconomy: Evidence From Experts and Representative Samples," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 89(6), pages 2958-2991.
    14. Ingvild Almås & Orazio Attanasio & Pamela Jervis, 2024. "Reply to: Comment on “Presidential Address: Economics and Measurement: New Measures to Model Decision Making”," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 92(4), pages 991-993, July.
    15. Zhang, Mingxue & Wang, Yue & Hou, Lingling, 2024. "Gender norms and the child penalty in China," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 277-291.
    16. Miller, Grant & de Paula, Áureo & Valente, Christine, 2025. "Subjective expectations and demand for contraception," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 249(PB).
    17. Ai, Jingyi & Feng, Jin & Zhang, Xiaohan, 2024. "Long-term care insurance coverage and labor force participation of older people: Evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    18. Tom S. Vogl, 2016. "Differential Fertility, Human Capital, and Development," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 83(1), pages 365-401.
    19. Andreas Fuster & Greg Kaplan & Basit Zafar, 2021. "What Would You Do with $500? Spending Responses to Gains, Losses, News, and Loans [The Spending and Debt Response to Minimum Wage Hikes]," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 88(4), pages 1760-1795.
    20. David de la Croix & Matthias Doepke, 2003. "Inequality and Growth: Why Differential Fertility Matters," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(4), pages 1091-1113, September.
    21. Orazio Attanasio & Agnes Kovacs & Krisztina Molnar, 2020. "Euler Equations, Subjective Expectations and Income Shocks," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 87(346), pages 406-441, April.
    22. Matthew Wiswall & Basit Zafar, 2015. "Determinants of College Major Choice: Identification using an Information Experiment," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 82(2), pages 791-824.
    23. Naijia Guo & Anning Xie, 2026. "Childbirth and Welfare Inequality: The Role of Bargaining Power and Intrahousehold Allocation," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2025_725, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
    24. Christine Ho & Yutao Wang, 2024. "Social Institutions and Low Birth Rates," Economics and Statistics Working Papers 11-2024, Singapore Management University, School of Economics.
    25. Jeff Dominitz & Charles F. Manski, 1996. "Eliciting Student Expectations of the Returns to Schooling," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 31(1), pages 1-26.
    26. Nikolay Angelov & Per Johansson & Mikael Lindahl & Ariel Pihl, 2026. "Earnings Expectations and Educational Sorting: An Ex‐Ante Perspective on Returns to University Education," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(1), pages 88-107, January.
    27. Jeremy Lise & Ken Yamada, 2019. "Household Sharing and Commitment: Evidence from Panel Data on Individual Expenditures and Time Use," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 86(5), pages 2184-2219.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Orazio Attanasio & V’ctor Sancibri‡n & Federica Ambrosio, 2025. "New Measures for Richer Theories: Some Thoughts and an Example," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2477, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    2. Adeline L. Delavande & Gizem Koşar & Basit Zafar, 2025. "Expectations and Information Frictions Within Couples: Evidence from a Sequential Survey of Spouses," NBER Working Papers 33879, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Mahler, Lukas & Tertilt, Michèle & Yum, Minchul, 2025. "Policy Concerns in an Era of Low Fertility: The Role of Social Comparisons and Intensive Parenting," CEPR Discussion Papers 20767, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    4. Michael Bar & Moshe Hazan & Oksana Leukhina & David Weiss & Hosny Zoabi, 2018. "Why did rich families increase their fertility? Inequality and marketization of child care," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 427-463, December.
    5. Schmöller, Michaela & Goldfayn-Frank, Olga & Schmidt, Tobias, 2025. "Beyond the short run: Monetary policy and innovation investment," Discussion Papers 18/2025, Deutsche Bundesbank.
    6. Gizem Koşar & Cormac O'Dea, 2022. "Expectations Data in Structural Microeconomic Models," NBER Working Papers 30094, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Sylvain Dessy & Setou Diarra & Roland Pongou, 2017. "Underage Brides and Grooms’ Education," Working Papers 1704E, University of Ottawa, Department of Economics.
    8. Janet Hua Jiang & Rupal Kamdar & Kelin Lu & Daniela Puzzello, 2024. "How Do Households Respond to Expected Inflation? An Investigation of Transmission Mechanisms," CAEPR Working Papers 2024-004 Classification-D, Center for Applied Economics and Policy Research, Department of Economics, Indiana University Bloomington.
    9. Thomas Demuynck & León Hennen, 2026. "The Hyperplane Model of Survey Response," Working Papers ECARES 2026-04, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    10. Dessy, Sylvain & Diarra, Setou & Pongou, Roland, 2017. "Underage Brides and Grooms' Education," MPRA Paper 77326, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Brosch, Hanna & Lergetporer, Philipp & Schoner, Florian, 2025. "Worker Beliefs about Firm Training," IZA Discussion Papers 18186, IZA Network @ LISER.
    12. Daishin Yasui, 2017. "A Theory Of The Cross‐Sectional Fertility Differential: Job Heterogeneity Approach," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 58(1), pages 287-306, February.
    13. Hanzhi Hu, 2023. "The Consequences of Fertility Decline on Educational Attainment in China," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 42(6), pages 1-30, December.
    14. Aidala, Felix & Armantier, Olivier & Koşar, Gizem & Somerville, Jason & Topa, Giorgio & van der Klaauw, Wilbert, 2024. "Gasoline price changes and consumer inflation expectations: Experimental evidence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 66-80.
    15. Steinbach, Armin & Sarferaz, Samad & Mikosch, Heiner & Dibiasi, Andreas, 2025. "Fiscal Responses to Monetary Policy: Insights From a Survey of Government Officials," HEC Research Papers Series 1594, HEC Paris.
    16. Asger Lau Andersen & Niels Johannesen & Jens Brøndum Petersen & Sonja Settele & Johannes Wohlfart, 2026. "Household Behavior Below the Zero Lower Bound," CESifo Working Paper Series 12732, CESifo.
    17. Asger Lau Andersen & Niels Johannesen & Jens Brøndum Petersen & Sonja Settele & Johannes Wohlfart, 2026. "Household Behavior Below the Zero Lower Bound," ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series 418, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
    18. Stephane Bonhomme & Angela Denis, 2023. "Estimating Individual Responses when Tomorrow Matters," Papers 2310.09105, arXiv.org, revised May 2026.
    19. Klaus Abberger & Alexander Rathke & Samad Sarferaz & Pascal Seiler, 2025. "Monetary Policy Shocks and Firms' Investment Decisions," CESifo Working Paper Series 12099, CESifo.
    20. Ingar Haaland & Christopher Roth & Stefanie Stantcheva & Johannes Wohlfart, 2025. "Understanding Economic Behavior Using Open-Ended Survey Data," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 63(4), pages 1244-1280, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D1 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior
    • D7 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making
    • J1 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:128947. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.