IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/wcz8s.html

Time-Varying Pricing May Increase Total Electricity Consumption: Evidence from Costa Rica

Author

Listed:
  • Capitán, Tabaré
  • Alpízar, Francisco
  • Madrigal-Ballestero, Róger
  • Pattanayak, Subhrendu

Abstract

We study the implementation of a time-varying pricing (TVP) program by a major electric utility in Costa Rica. Our data come from approximately 7500 households who either remain in the TVP program, join, or leave during the period of the study. Because of particular features of these data, we use recently developed understanding of the two-way fixed effects differences-in-differences estimator along with event-study specifications to interpret our results in terms of bounds on the true estimate. Similar to previous research, we find that the program reduces consumption during peak-hours. However, in contrast with previous research, we find that the program increases total consumption. We explain the differences between our results and the typical finding with a simple economic framework that is based on the setting we study – common to many low-and-middle-income tropical countries – very few households have heating or cooling devices. While previous research used data from rich countries in which the use of heating and cooling devices drives electricity consumption is prevalent, in our setting, since there is no room for technological changes, behavioral changes to reduce consumption during peak hours are not enough to offset the increased consumption during peak hours. Our results serve as a cautionary piece of evidence for policy makers interested in reducing consumption during peak hours – the goal can potentially be achieved with TVP, but the cost is increased total consumption.

Suggested Citation

  • Capitán, Tabaré & Alpízar, Francisco & Madrigal-Ballestero, Róger & Pattanayak, Subhrendu, 2020. "Time-Varying Pricing May Increase Total Electricity Consumption: Evidence from Costa Rica," SocArXiv wcz8s, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:wcz8s
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/wcz8s
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/5e6fa95b4a60a5039fbb9e5a/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/wcz8s?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Clément de Chaisemartin & Xavier D'Haultfœuille, 2020. "Two-Way Fixed Effects Estimators with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 110(9), pages 2964-2996, September.
    2. Allcott, Hunt, 2011. "Rethinking real-time electricity pricing," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 820-842.
    3. Athey, Susan & Imbens, Guido W., 2022. "Design-based analysis in Difference-In-Differences settings with staggered adoption," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 226(1), pages 62-79.
    4. Koichiro Ito & Takanori Ida & Makoto Tanaka, 2023. "Selection on Welfare Gains: Experimental Evidence from Electricity Plan Choice," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 113(11), pages 2937-2973, November.
    5. repec:aen:journl:2007v28-02-a06 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Frank A. Wolak, 2011. "Do Residential Customers Respond to Hourly Prices? Evidence from a Dynamic Pricing Experiment," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 101(3), pages 83-87, May.
    7. Severin Borenstein, 2005. "Wealth Transfers from Implementing Real-Time Retail Electricity Pricing," NBER Working Papers 11594, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Goodman-Bacon, Andrew, 2021. "Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 225(2), pages 254-277.
    9. James J. Heckman & Vytlacil, Edward J., 2007. "Econometric Evaluation of Social Programs, Part I: Causal Models, Structural Models and Econometric Policy Evaluation," Handbook of Econometrics, in: J.J. Heckman & E.E. Leamer (ed.), Handbook of Econometrics, edition 1, volume 6, chapter 70, Elsevier.
    10. repec:aen:journl:2005v26-03-a05 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Jessoe, Katrina & Rapson, David & Smith, Jeremy B., 2014. "Towards understanding the role of price in residential electricity choices: Evidence from a natural experiment," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 107(PA), pages 191-208.
    12. Sun, Liyang & Abraham, Sarah, 2021. "Estimating dynamic treatment effects in event studies with heterogeneous treatment effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 225(2), pages 175-199.
    13. Goutam Dutta & Krishnendranath Mitra, 2017. "A literature review on dynamic pricing of electricity," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(10), pages 1131-1145, October.
    14. Ahmad Faruqui & Sanem Sergici, 2010. "Household response to dynamic pricing of electricity: a survey of 15 experiments," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 193-225, October.
    15. Koichiro Ito, 2014. "Do Consumers Respond to Marginal or Average Price? Evidence from Nonlinear Electricity Pricing," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(2), pages 537-563, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lang, Corey & Qiu, Yueming (Lucy) & Dong, Luran, 2023. "Increasing voluntary enrollment in time-of-use electricity rates: Findings from a survey experiment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    2. Kapeller, Rudolf & Cohen, Jed J. & Kollmann, Andrea & Reichl, Johannes, 2023. "Incentivizing residential electricity consumers to increase demand during periods of high local solar generation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(PA).
    3. Li, Lingfang & Qiu, Jiehong & Fang, Gang, 2025. "The effect of electricity time-of-use plans: Evidence from the industrial sector in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    4. Banasaz, Mohammadmahdi & Bose, Niloy & Sedaghatkish, Nazanin, 2025. "Identification of loan effects on personal finance: A case for small U.S. entrepreneurs," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    5. Mac Clay, Pablo & Börner, Jan & Sellare, Jorge, 2023. "Institutional and macroeconomic stability mediate the effect of auctions on renewable energy capacity," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    6. Rik Chakraborti & Gavin Roberts, 2023. "How price-gouging regulation undermined COVID-19 mitigation: county-level evidence of unintended consequences," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 196(1), pages 51-83, July.
    7. Schindler, Yannick & Scott, Andrew J., 2025. "The macroeconomic impact of chronic disease in the United Kingdom," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 32(C).
    8. Bellégo, Christophe & Benatia, David & Dortet-Bernadet, Vincent, 2025. "The chained difference-in-differences," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    9. Tatsuru Kikuchi, 2025. "A Unified Framework for Spatial and Temporal Treatment Effect Boundaries: Theory and Identification," Papers 2510.00754, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2025.
    10. Sho Miyaji, 2024. "Instrumented Difference-in-Differences with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects," Discussion Paper Series DP2024-22, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University.
    11. Bhattacharjee, Arnab & Aravena, Claudia & Castillo, Natalia & Ehrlich, Marco & Taou, Nadia & Wagner, Thomas, 2022. "Agroforestry Programs in the Colombian Amazon: Selection, Treatment and Exposure Effects on Deforestation," National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) Discussion Papers 537, National Institute of Economic and Social Research.
    12. Clément de Chaisemartin & Xavier D’Haultfœuille, 2023. "Two-way fixed effects and differences-in-differences with heterogeneous treatment effects: a survey," The Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 26(3), pages 1-30.
    13. Guanyu Lu & Hajime Katayama & Toshi H. Arimura & Shohei Morimura & Tomoichi Ishiwatari & Tetsu Iwasaki, 2026. "Does an Artificial Intelligence Energy Management System Reduce Electricity Consumption in Japan's Retail Sector?," RIEEM Discussion Paper Series 2502, Research Institute for Environmental Economics and Management, Waseda University.
    14. Coraggio, Luca & Pagano, Marco & Scognamiglio, Annalisa & Tåg, Joacim, 2025. "JAQ of all trades: Job mismatch, firm productivity and managerial quality," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    15. Hannah Klauber & Felix Holub & Nicolas Koch & Nico Pestel & Nolan Ritter & Alexander Rohlf, 2024. "Killing Prescriptions Softly: Low Emission Zones and Child Health from Birth to School," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 16(2), pages 220-248, May.
    16. Edward W. Chen & Reagan Lengefeld & Omar Asensio, 2026. "The Positive Spillovers to Risky Investments in Vacant, Abandoned, and Disinvested Properties," NBER Chapters, in: Measurement of Housing and the Housing Sector, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    17. Jaworski, Krystian & Olipra, Jakub, 2025. "Cutting VAT rate on food products in a high-inflation environment. Does it work out?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    18. Jean-Victor Alipour & Valentin Lindlacher, 2025. "No Surprises, Please: Voting Costs and Electoral Turnout," Journal of Political Economy Microeconomics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 3(1), pages 59-97.
    19. Bhorat, Haroon & Köhler, Timothy, 2025. "The labour market effects of cash transfers to the unemployed: Evidence from South Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    20. Julia Hatamyar, 2022. "Workplace Breastfeeding Legislation and Female Labor Force Participation in the United States," Papers 2209.05916, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2024.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • Q41 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Demand and Supply; Prices
    • Q47 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Energy Forecasting
    • Q50 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:wcz8s. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.