IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/27785.html

The Social Determinants of Choice Quality: Evidence from Health Insurance in the Netherlands

Author

Listed:
  • Benjamin R. Handel
  • Jonathan T. Kolstad
  • Thomas Minten
  • Johannes Spinnewijn

Abstract

Market provision of impure public goods such as insurance retirement savings and education is common and growing as policy makers seek to offer more choice and gain efficiencies. This approach induces an important trade-off between improved surplus from matching individuals to products and misallocation due to well documented choice errors in these markets. We study this trade-off in the health insurance market in the Netherlands, with a specific focus on misallocation and inequality. We characterize choice quality as a function of predicted health risk and leverage rich administrative data to study how it depends on individual human capital, socioeconomic status and social and information networks. We find that choice quality is low on average, with many people foregoing options that deliver substantive value. We also find a strong choice quality gradient with respect to key socioeconomic variables. Individuals with higher education levels and more analytic degrees or professions make markedly better decisions. Social influence on choices further increases inequality in decision making. Using panel variation in exposure to peers we find strong within firm, location and family impacts on choice quality. Finally, we use our estimates to model the consumer surplus effects of different counterfactual scenarios. While smart default policies could improve welfare substantially, including the choice of a high-deductible option delivers little welfare gain, especially for low-income individuals who make lower quality choices and are in worse health.

Suggested Citation

  • Benjamin R. Handel & Jonathan T. Kolstad & Thomas Minten & Johannes Spinnewijn, 2020. "The Social Determinants of Choice Quality: Evidence from Health Insurance in the Netherlands," NBER Working Papers 27785, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:27785
    Note: EH IO PE
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w27785.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Y. Campbell, 2016. "Restoring Rational Choice: The Challenge of Consumer Financial Regulation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(5), pages 1-30, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gu, Yiquan & Rasch, Alexander & Wenzel, Tobias, 2022. "Consumer salience and quality provision in (un)regulated public service markets," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    2. Kolsrud, Jonas & Spinnewijn, Johannes, 2024. "The value and limits of unemployment insurance," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 122225, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Xavier Jaravel, 2021. "Inflation Inequality: Measurement, Causes, and Policy Implications," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 13(1), pages 599-629, August.
    4. Nathaniel Hendren & Camille Landais & Johannes Spinnewijn, 2021. "Choice in Insurance Markets: A Pigouvian Approach to Social Insurance Design," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 13(1), pages 457-486, August.
    5. Ana Cecilia Quiroga Gutierrez & Stefan Boes, 2024. "Bridging the gap: Experimental evidence on information provision and health insurance choices," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(6), pages 1368-1386, June.
    6. Aaltonen, Katri & Vaalavuo, Maria, 2024. "Financial burden of medicines in five Northern European countries: A decommodification perspective," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 347(C).
    7. Holst, Laurens & Rademakers, Jany J.D.J.M. & Brabers, Anne E.M. & de Jong, Judith D., 2022. "Measuring health insurance literacy in the Netherlands – First results of the HILM-NL questionnaire," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(11), pages 1157-1162.
    8. Avdic, Daniel & Decker, Simon & Karlsson, Martin & Salm, Martin, 2024. "No-claim refunds and healthcare use," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    9. Naoki Aizawa & You Suk Kim, 2020. "Public and Private Provision of Information in Market-Based Public Programs: Evidence from Advertising in Health Insurance Marketplaces," NBER Working Papers 27695, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Glenn W. Harrison, 2024. "Risk preferences and risk perceptions in insurance experiments: some methodological challenges," The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics (The Geneva Association), vol. 49(1), pages 127-161, March.
    11. Benjamin R. Handel & Jonathan T. Kolstad, 2021. "The Affordable Care Act After a Decade: Industrial Organization of the Insurance Exchanges," NBER Working Papers 29178, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Lily Davies & Mark Kattenberg & Benedikt Vogt, 2023. "Predicting Firm Exits with Machine Learning: Implications for Selection into COVID-19 Support and Productivity Growth," CPB Discussion Paper 444, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    13. Boone, Jan, 2024. "Pricing above value: Selling to a market with selection problems," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    14. Tess L. C. Bardy & Stefan Boes, 2024. "Does targeted information impact consumers’ preferences for value-based health insurance? Evidence from a survey experiment," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Florian Exler & Igor Livshits & James MacGee & Michele Tertilt, 2018. "Regulating Consumer Credit with Over-Optimistic Borrowers," 2018 Meeting Papers 1064, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    2. Sujoy Mukerji & Han N. Ozsoylev & Jean‐Marc Tallon, 2023. "Trading Ambiguity: A Tale Of Two Heterogeneities," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 64(3), pages 1127-1164, August.
    3. Tertilt, Michèle & Exler, Florian & Livshits, Igor & MacGee, Jim, 2020. "Consumer Credit with Over-Optimistic Borrowers," CEPR Discussion Papers 15570, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    4. Harun Aydilek & Asiye Aydilek, 2024. "Welfare costs of suboptimal retiree decisions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(8), pages 1-29, August.
    5. Eduardo Dávila & Ansgar Walther, 2023. "Prudential Policy with Distorted Beliefs," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 113(7), pages 1967-2006, July.
    6. Feng, Jingbing & Xu, Xian & Zou, Hong, 2023. "Risk communication clarity and insurance demand: The case of the COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    7. Mehran Ebrahimian & Jessica Wachter, 2020. "Risks to Human Capital," NBER Working Papers 26823, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Scherer, Bernd & Lehner, Sebastian, 2025. "What drives robo-advice?," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    9. Andreas Dietrich & Reto Rey, 2020. "What Matters to Individual Investors: Price Setting in Online Auctions of P2P Consumer Loans," Papers 2003.11347, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2022.
    10. Olkhov, Victor, 2018. "Economic Transactions Govern Business Cycles," MPRA Paper 87207, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Samuli Knüpfer & Elias Rantapuska & Matti Sarvimäki, 2023. "Social Interaction in the Family: Evidence from Investors’ Security Holdings," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 27(4), pages 1297-1327.
    12. Magnus Dahlquist & Ofer Setty & Roine Vestman, 2018. "On the Asset Allocation of a Default Pension Fund," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 73(4), pages 1893-1936, August.
    13. Suting Hong & Robert M. Hunt & Konstantinos Serfes, 2023. "Dynamic Pricing of Credit Cards and the Effects of Regulation," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 64(1), pages 81-131, August.
    14. Bonaparte, Yosef & Khalaf, Sarah & Korniotis, George, 2022. "The Obama Effect: Heightened Risk Tolerance, Optimism, and Wealth Accumulation by Minorities after 2008," CEPR Discussion Papers 14264, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    15. T. R. Harmon-Kizer, 2019. "Let the Borrower Beware: Towards a Framework for Debiasing Rollover Behavior in the Payday Loan Industry," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 42(2), pages 245-266, June.
    16. Mugerman, Yevgeny & Steinberg, Nadav & Wiener, Zvi, 2022. "The exclamation mark of Cain: Risk salience and mutual fund flows," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    17. Zach Y. Brown & Mark L. Egan & Jihye Jeon & Chuqing Jin & Alex A. Wu, 2023. "Why Do Index Funds Have Market Power? Quantifying Frictions in the Index Fund Market," NBER Working Papers 31778, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    18. Eduardo Dávila, 2023. "Optimal Financial Transaction Taxes," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 78(1), pages 5-61, February.
    19. Jackson P. Lautier & Vladimir Pozdnyakov & Jun Yan, 2022. "On the Convergence of Credit Risk in Current Consumer Automobile Loans," Papers 2211.09176, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2024.
    20. Barboni, Giorgia & Cardenas, Juan Camilo & de Roux, Nicolas, 2022. "Behavioral Messages and Debt Repayment," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 633, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • D91 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making
    • H42 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Publicly Provided Private Goods
    • I13 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Insurance, Public and Private
    • I14 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health and Inequality

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:27785. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.