IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Partnerships, value chain upgrading and performance in the forestry sectors of Tanzania and Uganda


  • Joseph Walusimbi

    (DBA candidate at the Maastricht School of Management (MSM))

  • Robert Goedegebuure, PhD

    (Associate Professor at the Maastricht School of Management (MSM))

  • André de Waal, PhD

    (Associate Professor at the Maastricht School of Management (MSM))


Uganda faces several constraints in its forestry sector. Fragmentation of the sector and a lack of collective strength result in lost opportunities in policy advocacy; product development; sharing of market information; expanding to new markets; developing market standards; and taking advantage of training and support offered by government or non-government organizations funded initiatives. Specifically in the forestry sector the Uganda Government has asserted that “the key to poverty alleviation and sustainable forest management lies with those stakeholder groups that are involved in production, utilization and processing of forest produce” (Uganda Forest Sector Coordination Secretariat, 2001). As highlighted by Auren & Krassowska (2004), a broad spectrum of forestry-based associations exist in Uganda in terms of their geographical scope, their level of formalization and their objectives – from those focusing primarily on social welfare of members to those entrepreneurs who collaborate to achieve some commercial advantage in a competitive market. To empower tree growers associations in Tanzania, the Forestry and Beekeeping Department (FBD) in conjunction with service providers like Green Resources Limited provide a number of development support activities to them ranging from technical forestry, associations’ management guidelines and establishment of alternative income generating activities to marketing techniques. For more detailed information on the forestry sectors in the two countries, see Walusimbi (2014, forthcoming). This paper thesis explores the quality of partnerships between small to medium sized commercial forestry producers in Tanzania and Uganda, and their associations, and the impact these partnerships have on upgrading of activities and ultimately business performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Joseph Walusimbi & Robert Goedegebuure, PhD & André de Waal, PhD, 2014. "Partnerships, value chain upgrading and performance in the forestry sectors of Tanzania and Uganda," Working Papers 2014/02, Maastricht School of Management.
  • Handle: RePEc:msm:wpaper:2014/02

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    File Function: First version, 2014
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Yuri Dikhanov, 2005. "Trends in Global Income Distribution, 1970-2000, and Scenarios for 2015," Human Development Occasional Papers (1992-2007) HDOCPA-2005-08, Human Development Report Office (HDRO), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP).
    2. Bruno S. Frey & Alois Stutzer, 2002. "What Can Economists Learn from Happiness Research?," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 40(2), pages 402-435, June.
    3. Fang, Tony, 2012. "Yin Yang: A New Perspective on Culture," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(01), pages 25-50, March.
    4. Wanna Prayukvong, 2005. "A Buddhist economic approach to the development of community enterprises: a case study from Southern Thailand," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 29(6), pages 1171-1185, November.
    5. Duska, Ronald, 2000. "Business Ethics: Oxymoron or Good Business?," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(01), pages 111-129, January.
    6. Layard, Richard, 1980. "Human Satisfactions and Public Policy," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 90(363), pages 737-750, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:msm:wpaper:2014/02. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Maud de By). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.