IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/lsg/lsgwps/wp01.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The economics of the CDM levy: Revenue potential, tax incidence and distortionary effects

Author

Listed:
  • Samuel Fankhauser
  • Nat Martin
  • Stephen Prichard

Abstract

A levy on the Clean Development Mechanism and other carbon trading schemes is a potential source of finance for climate change adaptation. An adaptation levy of 2 percent is currently imposed on all CDM transactions which could raise around $500 million between now and 2012. This paper analyses the scope for raising further adaptation finance from the CDM, the economic costs (deadweight loss) of such a measure and the incidence of the levy, that is, the economic burden the levy would impose on the buyers and sellers of credits. We find that a levy of 2 percent could raise up to $2 billion a year in 2020 if there are no restrictions on demand. This could rise to $10 billion for a 10 percent tax. Restrictions on credit demand (called supplementarity limits, the requirement that most emission abatement should happen domestically) curtail trade volumes and consequently tax revenues. They also alter the economic impact of the CDM levy. Without supplementarity restrictions sellers (developing countries) bear two-thirds of the cost of the tax. If there are supplementarity limits they can pass on the tax burden to buyers (developed countries) more or less in full. Without supplementarity restrictions the distortionary effect of the levy (its deadweight loss) rises sharply with the tax rate. With them the deadweight loss is close to zero.

Suggested Citation

  • Samuel Fankhauser & Nat Martin & Stephen Prichard, 2009. "The economics of the CDM levy: Revenue potential, tax incidence and distortionary effects," GRI Working Papers 1, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
  • Handle: RePEc:lsg:lsgwps:wp01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/WP1_economics-cdm-levy.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Samuel Fankhauser, 2009. "The costs of adaptation," GRI Working Papers 7, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
    2. Benitez, Pablo C. & McCallum, Ian & Obersteiner, Michael & Yamagata, Yoshiki, 2007. "Global potential for carbon sequestration: Geographical distribution, country risk and policy implications," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 572-583, January.
    3. Fankhauser, Samuel & Hepburn, Cameron, 2009. "Carbon markets in space and time," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 37606, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Fankhauser, Samuel, 2009. "The costs of adaptation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 37610, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fankhauser, Samuel & Martin, Nat & Prichard, Stephen, 2009. "The economics of the CDM levy: revenue potential, tax incidence and distortionary effects," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 37604, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Fankhauser, Samuel & Martin, Nat, 2010. "The economics of the CDM levy: Revenue potential, tax incidence and distortionary effects," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 357-363, January.
    3. Kruse, Tobias & Atkinson, Giles, 2022. "Understanding public support for international climate adaptation payments: Evidence from a choice experiment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    4. Michailidou, Alexandra V. & Vlachokostas, Christos & Moussiopoulos, Νicolas, 2016. "Interactions between climate change and the tourism sector: Multiple-criteria decision analysis to assess mitigation and adaptation options in tourism areas," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 1-12.
    5. Qu, Jiansheng & Zeng, Jingjing & Li, Yan & Wang, Qin & Maraseni, Tek & Zhang, Lihua & Zhang, Zhiqiang & Clarke-Sather, Abigail, 2013. "Household carbon dioxide emissions from peasants and herdsmen in northwestern arid-alpine regions, China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 133-140.
    6. Frank Jotzo, 2010. "Prerequisites and limits for economic modelling of climate change impacts and adaptation," Environmental Economics Research Hub Research Reports 1055, Environmental Economics Research Hub, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    7. Juan C. Ciscar & Daniele Paci & Lucia Vergano, 2010. "Issues on the Economics of Adaptation to Climate Change," Chapters, in: Emilio Cerdá Tena & Xavier Labandeira (ed.), Climate Change Policies, chapter 3, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. Abrar Chaudhury, 2020. "Role of Intermediaries in Shaping Climate Finance in Developing Countries—Lessons from the Green Climate Fund," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-17, July.
    9. Thierry Bréchet & Natali Hritonenko & Yuri Yatsenko, 2013. "Adaptation and Mitigation in Long-term Climate Policy," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 55(2), pages 217-243, June.
    10. repec:dau:papers:123456789/7780 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. -, 2011. "An economic assessment of the impact of climate change on the health sector in Montserrat," Sede Subregional de la CEPAL para el Caribe (Estudios e Investigaciones) 38589, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    12. Sterk, Wolfgang & Arens, Christof & Beuermann, Christiane & Bongardt, Daniel & Borbonus, Sylvia & Dienst, Carmen & Eichhorst, Urda & Kiyar, Dagmar & Luhmann, Hans-Jochen & Ott, Hermann E. & Rudolph, F, 2009. "Towards an effective and equitable climate change agreement: A Wuppertal proposal for Copenhagen," Wuppertal Spezial, Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy, volume 40, number 40.
    13. Sara Trærup & Jean Stephan, 2015. "Technologies for adaptation to climate change. Examples from the agricultural and water sectors in Lebanon," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 131(3), pages 435-449, August.
    14. World Bank, 2016. "Making Climate Finance Work in Agriculture," World Bank Publications - Reports 24686, The World Bank Group.
    15. Springmann, Marco, 2012. "The costs of climate-change adaptation in Europe: A review," EIB Working Papers 2012/05, European Investment Bank (EIB).
    16. K.S. Kavi Kumar & Kamal Karunagoda & Enamul Haque & L. Venkatachelam & Girish Nath Bahal, 2012. "Addressing Long-term Challenges to Food Security and Rural Livelihoods in South Asia," Working Papers 2012-075, Madras School of Economics,Chennai,India.
    17. Patrice Dumas & Minh Ha-Duong, 2013. "Optimal growth with adaptation to climate change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 117(4), pages 691-710, April.
    18. Sonja, Vermeulen & Meryl, Richards & Alessandro, De Pinto & Dino, Ferrarese & Peter, Läderach & Le, Lan & Marty, Luckert & Enrico, Mazzoli & Laura, Plant & Roberto, Rinaldi & Jim, Stephenson & Paul, W, 2016. "The Economic Advantage: Assessing the value of climate-change actions in agriculture," IFAD Advantage Series 304740, International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD).
    19. Silvia Amato, 2016. "East Asia Industrial Conversion Activity: Outlook at Post-Disaster Crisis Assessments with Technology Integration and Competitive Assimilation Modes," China Economic Policy Review (CEPR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 5(01), pages 1-44, June.
    20. M. Jayaprakash & K. Sivakumar & S. Muthusamy & R. R. Krishnamurthy & J. K. Edward Patterson, 2016. "Shrinking of Vann Island, Gulf of Mannar, SE coast of India: assessing the impacts," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 84(3), pages 1529-1538, December.
    21. Martin Stadelmann & Åsa Persson & Izabela Ratajczak-Juszko & Axel Michaelowa, 2014. "Equity and cost-effectiveness of multilateral adaptation finance: are they friends or foes?," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 101-120, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lsg:lsgwps:wp01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The GRI Administration (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/grlseuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.