IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hka/wpaper/2017-077.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Cohort Effects in Children's Delay-of-Gratification

Author

Listed:
  • Stephanie Carlson

    (University of Minnesota)

  • Yuichi Shoda

    (University of Washington)

  • Ozlem Ayduk

    (University of California at Berkeley)

  • Lawrence Aber

    (New York University)

  • Catherine Schaefer

    (Pennsylvania State University)

  • Anita Sethi

    (The Happy Montessori School)

  • Nicole Wilson

    (University of Washington)

  • Philip Peake

    (Smith College)

  • Walter Mischel

    (Columbia University)

Abstract

In the 1960s at Stanford University's Bing Preschool, children were given the option of taking an immediate, smaller reward or receiving a delayed, larger reward by waiting until the experimenter returned. Since then, the "Marshmallow Test" has been used in numerous studies to assess delay-of-gratification. Yet, no prior study has compared the performance of children across the decades. Common wisdom suggests children today would wait less long, preferring immediate gratification. Study 1 confirmed this intuition in a survey of adults in the U.S. (N = 354; Median age = 34 years). To test the validity of this intuition, in Study 2 we analyzed the original data for average delay-of-gratification times (out of 10 min) of 840 typically developing U.S. children in three birth cohorts from similar middle-high socioeconomic backgrounds, tested 20 years apart (1960s, 1980s, and 2000s), matched on age (3-5 years) at the time of testing. In contrast to popular belief, results revealed a linear increase in delay over time, such that children in the 2000s waited on average 2 min longer than children in the 1960s, and 1 min longer than children in the 1980s. This pattern was robust with respect to age, sex, geography and sampling effects. We posit that increases in symbolic thought, technology, and public attention to self-regulation have contributed to this finding, but caution that more research in diverse populations is needed to examine the generality of the findings and to identify the causal factors underlying them.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephanie Carlson & Yuichi Shoda & Ozlem Ayduk & Lawrence Aber & Catherine Schaefer & Anita Sethi & Nicole Wilson & Philip Peake & Walter Mischel, 2017. "Cohort Effects in Children's Delay-of-Gratification," Working Papers 2017-077, Human Capital and Economic Opportunity Working Group.
  • Handle: RePEc:hka:wpaper:2017-077
    Note: IP
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://humcap.uchicago.edu/RePEc/hka/wpaper/Carlson_Shoda_Ayduk_etal_2017_cohort-effects-delay-gratification.pdf
    File Function: First version, October, 2017
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://humcap.uchicago.edu/RePEc/hka/wpaper/Carlson_Shoda_Ayduk_etal_2017_cohort-effects-delay-gratification_update-2.pdf
    File Function: Third version, March 1, 2018
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jay Bainbridge & Marcia K. Meyers & Sakiko Tanaka & Jane Waldfogel, 2005. "Who Gets an Early Education? Family Income and the Enrollment of Three‐ to Five‐Year‐Olds from 1968 to 2000," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 86(3), pages 724-745, September.
    2. C. Shawn Green & Daphne Bavelier, 2003. "Action video game modifies visual selective attention," Nature, Nature, vol. 423(6939), pages 534-537, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pierre Mégevand & Sophie Molholm & Ashabari Nayak & John J Foxe, 2013. "Recalibration of the Multisensory Temporal Window of Integration Results from Changing Task Demands," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(8), pages 1-9, August.
    2. Jere R. Behrman & Dante Contreras & Maria Isidora Palma & Esteban Puentes, 2024. "Socioeconomic Disparities for Early Childhood Anthropometrics and Vocabulary and Socio-emotional Skills: Dynamic Evidence from Chilean Longitudinal Data," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 43(1), pages 1-28, February.
    3. Elizabeth E. Davis & Caroline Carlin & Caroline Krafft & Nicole D. Forry, 2018. "Do Child Care Subsidies Increase Employment Among Low-Income Parents?," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 39(4), pages 662-682, December.
    4. Jessen, Jonas & Schmitz, Sophia & Waights, Sevrin, 2020. "Understanding day care enrolment gaps," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    5. Brian D Glass & W Todd Maddox & Bradley C Love, 2013. "Real-Time Strategy Game Training: Emergence of a Cognitive Flexibility Trait," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(8), pages 1-7, August.
    6. Aaron V Berard & Matthew S Cain & Takeo Watanabe & Yuka Sasaki, 2015. "Frequent Video Game Players Resist Perceptual Interference," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-10, March.
    7. Aleksandar Klasnja & Natasa Milenovic & Sonja Lukac & Aleksandar Knezevic & Jelena Klasnja & Vedrana Karan Rakic, 2022. "The Effects of Regular Physical Activity and Playing Video Games on Reaction Time in Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-7, July.
    8. Stefanie Duyck & Hans Op de Beeck, 2019. "An investigation of far and near transfer in a gamified visual learning paradigm," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(12), pages 1-23, December.
    9. Herbst, Chris M. & Tekin, Erdal, 2012. "The geographic accessibility of child care subsidies and evidence on the impact of subsidy receipt on childhood obesity," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(1), pages 37-52.
    10. Bonny, Justin W. & Scanlon, Mike & Castaneda, Lisa M., 2020. "Variations in psychological factors and experience-dependent changes in team-based video game performance," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    11. Charlotte Willems & Johannes Herdzin & Sander Martens, 2015. "Individual Differences in Temporal Selective Attention as Reflected in Pupil Dilation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-13, December.
    12. Anastasia Dimiski, 2020. "Factors that affect Students’ performance in Science: An application using Gini-BMA methodology in PISA 2015 dataset," Working Papers 2004, University of Guelph, Department of Economics and Finance.
    13. Rengjian Yu & Lihua He & Changsong Gao & Xianghong Zhang & Enlong Li & Tailiang Guo & Wenwu Li & Huipeng Chen, 2022. "Programmable ferroelectric bionic vision hardware with selective attention for high-precision image classification," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    14. Natalie Schock & Lieny Jeon, 2021. "ECE Program Supports and Teacher-Perceived Support from Families: Are They Connected?," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-22, September.
    15. Ünver, Özgün & Bircan, Tuba & Nicaise, Ides, 2021. "A multilevel approach to ECEC policies and intensity of formal childcare participation of young children in Europe," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    16. McCoy, Dana Charles & Salhi, Carmel & Yoshikawa, Hirokazu & Black, Maureen & Britto, Pia & Fink, Günther, 2018. "Home- and center-based learning opportunities for preschoolers in low- and middle-income countries," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 44-56.
    17. Tim Wulf & Nicholas D. Bowman & Diana Rieger & John A. Velez & Johannes Breuer, 2018. "Running Head: Video Game Nostalgia and Retro Gaming," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(2), pages 60-68.
    18. Greenberg, Joy Pastan, 2011. "The impact of maternal education on children's enrollment in early childhood education and care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(7), pages 1049-1057, July.
    19. Magnuson, Katherine & Shager, Hilary, 2010. "Early education: Progress and promise for children from low-income families," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(9), pages 1186-1198, September.
    20. Paul Frijters & Luo Chuliang & Xin Meng, 2012. "Child Education and the Family Income Gradient in China," Discussion Papers Series 470, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    delay of gratification; Marshmallow Test; executive function; cohort effect; preschool;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C91 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Laboratory, Individual Behavior
    • D03 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Behavioral Microeconomics: Underlying Principles
    • I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hka:wpaper:2017-077. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jennifer Pachon (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mfichus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.