IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hig/wpaper/47-soc-2014.html

Consumption Of Counterfeit Alcohol In Contemporary Russia: The Role Of Cultural And Structural Factors

Author

Listed:
  • Zoya Kotelnikova

    (National Research University Higher School of Economics)

Abstract

The majority of Russians believe that counterfeit alcohol may cause death. Nevertheless, alcohol is a common target of counterfeiting in contemporary Russia as are branded clothes, accessories and audio products. This paper aims to reveal whether counterfeit alcohol consumers are distinctive in terms of structure and culture. It investigates the prevalence and structure of counterfeit alcohol purchasing and consumption; attitudes and beliefs about counterfeit alcohol; and predictors of counterfeit alcohol consumption. The research is based on the Russia Longitudinal Monitoring Survey (RLMS-HSE), an annual nationwide panel survey designed to monitor the health and economic welfare of households and individuals in the Russian Federation. The research findings demonstrate that cultural and structural factors contribute a lot to the consumption of counterfeit alcohol. Counterfeit alcohol consumption is associated with hazardous alcohol drinkers and homemade alcohol drinkers who tend to ignore trademarks and the taste of alcoholic beverages. Blur counterfeiting is a characteristic of hazardous alcohol drinkers and vodka-lovers who are inclined to be price sensitive and to ignore brands. Social networks play a significant role in consumption of counterfeit alcohol. Counterfeit alcohol consumers are highly likely to represent lower classes.

Suggested Citation

  • Zoya Kotelnikova, 2014. "Consumption Of Counterfeit Alcohol In Contemporary Russia: The Role Of Cultural And Structural Factors," HSE Working papers WP BRP 47/SOC/2014, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:hig:wpaper:47/soc/2014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.hse.ru/data/2014/08/06/1314159630/47SOC2014.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bian, Xuemei & Moutinho, Luiz, 2009. "An investigation of determinants of counterfeit purchase consideration," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 368-378, March.
    2. Win‐Lin Chou, 2002. "Assessment of the Economic Impacts of China's WTO Entry on Hong Kong," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(8), pages 1129-1144, August.
    3. Beckert, Jens & Wehinger, Frank, 2011. "In the shadow illegal markets and economic sociology," MPIfG Discussion Paper 11/9, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    4. Yana Roshchina & Petr Martynenko, 2014. "Patterns of Alcohol Consumption as a Social Group Indicator in Modern Russian Cities," Journal of Economic Sociology, National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 15(1), pages 20-42.
    5. Beckert, Jens & Musselin, Christine (ed.), 2013. "Constructing Quality: The Classification of Goods in Markets," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199677573.
    6. Hirschman, Elizabeth C, 1992. "The Consciousness of Addiction: Toward a General Theory of Compulsive Consumption," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 19(2), pages 155-179, September.
    7. Nelson, Phillip, 1970. "Information and Consumer Behavior," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 78(2), pages 311-329, March-Apr.
    8. Gene M. Grossman & Carl Shapiro, 1988. "Foreign Counterfeiting of Status Goods," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 103(1), pages 79-100.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pueschel, Julia & Chamaret, Cécile & Parguel, Béatrice, 2017. "Coping with copies: The influence of risk perceptions in luxury counterfeit consumption in GCC countries," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 184-194.
    2. Bian, Xuemei & Wang, Kai-Yu & Smith, Andrew & Yannopoulou, Natalia, 2016. "New insights into unethical counterfeit consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 4249-4258.
    3. Shan, Juan & Jiang, Ling & Cui, Annie Peng, 2021. "A double-edged sword: How the dual characteristics of face motivate and prevent counterfeit luxury consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 59-69.
    4. Jiahan Li & Mahsa Ghaffari & Lin Su, 2020. "Counterfeit luxury consumption strategies in a collectivistic culture: the case of China," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(5), pages 546-560, September.
    5. Laura Alfaro & Cathy Bao & Maggie X. Chen & Junjie Hong & Claudia Steinwender, 2022. "Omnia Juncta in Uno*: foreign powers and trademark protection in Shanghai's concession era," CEP Discussion Papers dp1827, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    6. Busby, J.S., 2019. "The co-evolution of competition and parasitism in the resource-based view: A risk model of product counterfeiting," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(1), pages 300-313.
    7. Siham Mourad & Pierre Valette-Florence, 2011. "The Effects Of Counterfeit On Luxury Brand Buying Behavior, In Terms Of Consumption Experience," Post-Print halshs-00660417, HAL.
    8. Yoo, Boonghee & Lee, Seung-Hee, 2012. "Asymmetrical effects of past experiences with genuine fashion luxury brands and their counterfeits on purchase intention of each," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(10), pages 1507-1515.
    9. Yang, Jun & Mai, Enping (Shirley), 2010. "Experiential goods with network externalities effects: An empirical study of online rating system," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(9-10), pages 1050-1057, September.
    10. Daniela Benavente, 2010. "Geographical Indications: The Economics of Claw-Back," IHEID Working Papers 11-2010, Economics Section, The Graduate Institute of International Studies.
    11. Nelson Borges Amaral, 2020. "What can be done to address luxury counterfeiting? An integrative review of tactics and strategies," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(6), pages 691-709, November.
    12. Poddar, Amit & Foreman, Jeff & Banerjee, Syagnik (Sy) & Ellen, Pam Scholder, 2012. "Exploring the Robin Hood effect: Moral profiteering motives for purchasing counterfeit products," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(10), pages 1500-1506.
    13. Laura Alfaro & Cathy Bao & Maggie X. Chen & Junjie Hong & Claudia Steinwender, 2022. "Trademarks as Intellectual Property: Information Frictions, Firm Growth, and Competition," CESifo Working Paper Series 9548, CESifo.
    14. Correia, Antónia & Kozak, Metin, 2016. "Tourists' shopping experiences at street markets: Cross-country research," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 85-95.
    15. Rangnekar, Dwijen, 2004. "Demanding Stronger Protection for Geographical Indications: The Relationship between Local Knowledge, Information and Reputation," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 2004-11, United Nations University - INTECH.
    16. Richard Baldwin, 1988. "Some Empirical Evidence on Hysteresis in Aggregate US Import Prices," NBER Working Papers 2483, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    17. Chaudhry, Peggy E., 2022. "Dupe influencers exploiting social media to peddle luxury fakes," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 65(6), pages 719-727.
    18. Muhammad Rizwan & Muhammad Nasir Jamal & Zain-Ul-Abidin & Khadeeja Gul Zareen & Arslan Khan & Barza Farhat & Rashid Khan, 2013. "The Determinants of Purchase Intention towards Counterfeit Mobile Phones in Pakistan," Asian Journal of Empirical Research, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 3(2), pages 220-236, February.
    19. Diamantopoulos, Adamantios & Davydova, Olga & Arslanagic-Kalajdzic, Maja, 2019. "Modeling the role of consumer xenocentrism in impacting preferences for domestic and foreign brands: A mediation analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 587-596.
    20. Francesco Rullani & Karin Beukel & Matteo De Angelis, 2021. "Anti‐counterfeiting strategy unfolded: A closer look to the case of a large multinational manufacturer," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(11), pages 2084-2103, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Z - Other Special Topics

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hig:wpaper:47/soc/2014. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Shamil Abdulaev or Shamil Abdulaev (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hsecoru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.