IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hhs/nhhfms/2016_021.html

Batteries in Offshore Support vessels - Pollution, climate impact and economics

Author

Listed:

Abstract

This paper assesses the pros and the cons of installing batteries on offshore support vessels. These vessels are specially designed to provide services to oil and gas operations, such as anchor handling, supply and subsea operations. They have multiple engines and advanced dynamic positioning systems to ensure that they can perform their duties with high reliability at nearly any sea state. Combined with high safety requirements, this has resulted in general operational patterns with vessels running multiple combustion engines even at calm water conditions. For emissions, low engine loads yield high emissions of exhaust gases such as nitrogen oxides (NOx) and aerosols such as black carbon (BC), due to less favorable combustion conditions. The high span for these vessels between low loads and high, and their great need for potential power at short notice, motivate our examination of hybrid setups with electric: the vessel segment should be more favorable than many. We find that combining batteries with combustion engines reduces local pollution and climate impact, while the economics with current battery cost and fuel prices is good enough for new vessels, but not good enough for retrofits.

Suggested Citation

  • Lindstad, Haakon Elizabeth & Eskeland, Gunnar S. & Rialland, Agathe, 2016. "Batteries in Offshore Support vessels - Pollution, climate impact and economics," Discussion Papers 2016/21, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:hhs:nhhfms:2016_021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2424563
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lindstad, Haakon & Asbjørnslett, Bjørn E. & Strømman, Anders H., 2011. "Reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and cost by shipping at lower speeds," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 3456-3464, June.
    2. Charles S. Zender, 2012. "Snowfall brightens Antarctic future," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 2(11), pages 770-771, November.
    3. Fagerholt, Kjetil & Lindstad, Håkon, 2000. "Optimal policies for maintaining a supply service in the Norwegian Sea," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 269-275, June.
    4. Lindstad, Haakon & Bright, Ryan M. & Strømman, Anders H., 2016. "Economic savings linked to future Arctic shipping trade are at odds with climate change mitigation," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 24-30.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lindstad, Haakon & Bright, Ryan M. & Strømman, Anders H., 2016. "Economic savings linked to future Arctic shipping trade are at odds with climate change mitigation," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 24-30.
    2. Xing, Hui & Spence, Stephen & Chen, Hua, 2020. "A comprehensive review on countermeasures for CO2 emissions from ships," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    3. Mohammad Hossein Arabnejad & Fabian Thies & Hua-Dong Yao & Jonas W. Ringsberg, 2025. "Life Cycle Assessment Method for Ship Fuels Using a Ship Performance Prediction Model and Actual Operation Conditions—Case Study of Wind-Assisted Cargo Ship," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-18, August.
    4. Joseph, Lambert & Giles, Thomas & Nishatabbas, Rehmatulla & Tristan, Smith, 2021. "A techno-economic environmental cost model for Arctic shipping," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 28-51.
    5. Laurent Fedi & Olivier Faury & Laurent Etienne & Ali Cheaitou & Patrick Rigot-Muller, 2024. "Application of the IMO taxonomy on casualty investigation: Analysis of 20 years of marine accidents along the North-East Passage," Post-Print hal-04483233, HAL.
    6. Wu, Lingxiao & Pan, Kai & Wang, Shuaian & Yang, Dong, 2018. "Bulk ship scheduling in industrial shipping with stochastic backhaul canvassing demand," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PA), pages 117-136.
    7. Izadkhah, Aliakbar & Wang, Akang & Lainez-Aguirre, Jose M. & Pinto, Jose M. & Gounaris, Chrysanthos E., 2026. "The periodic vehicle routing problem with multi-day trips," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    8. Theocharis, Dimitrios & Pettit, Stephen & Rodrigues, Vasco Sanchez & Haider, Jane, 2018. "Arctic shipping: A systematic literature review of comparative studies," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 112-128.
    9. Jørgen Laake & Abraham Zhang, 2016. "Joint optimization of strategic fleet planning and contract analysis in tramp shipping," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(3), pages 203-211, January.
    10. Tanaka, Hidemi & Okada, Akira, 2019. "Effects of market-based measures on a shipping company: Using an optimal control approach for long-term modeling," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 63-71.
    11. Paula C. Pereda & Andrea Lucchesi, 2022. "Alternative frameworks for cost-effectiveness analysis of environmental policies in maritime transport," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 24(3), pages 630-650, September.
    12. Michael F. Gorman & John-Paul Clarke & Amir Hossein Gharehgozli & Michael Hewitt & René de Koster & Debjit Roy, 2014. "State of the Practice: A Review of the Application of OR/MS in Freight Transportation," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 44(6), pages 535-554, December.
    13. Amiri, Mohsen & Amin, Saman Hassanzadeh & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, Reza, 2019. "A Lagrangean decomposition approach for a novel two-echelon node-based location-routing problem in an offshore oil and gas supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 96-114.
    14. Di Lullo, Giovanni & Zhang, Hao & Kumar, Amit, 2016. "Evaluation of uncertainty in the well-to-tank and combustion greenhouse gas emissions of various transportation fuels," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 413-426.
    15. Overholts II, Dale L. & Bell, John E. & Arostegui, Marvin A., 2009. "A location analysis approach for military maintenance scheduling with geographically dispersed service areas," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 838-852, August.
    16. Adland, Roar & Cariou, Pierre & Wolff, Francois-Charles, 2020. "Optimal ship speed and the cubic law revisited: Empirical evidence from an oil tanker fleet," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    17. Ronald A. Halim & Lucie Kirstein & Olaf Merk & Luis M. Martinez, 2018. "Decarbonization Pathways for International Maritime Transport: A Model-Based Policy Impact Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-30, June.
    18. A. M. P. Santos & C. Guedes Soares, 2024. "A hub-location periodic vehicle routing problem in offshore oil and gas logistics," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 26(4), pages 685-709, December.
    19. Rasmussen, Rasmus, 2011. "TSP in spreadsheets--A fast and flexible tool," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 51-63, January.
    20. Finnsgård, Christian & Kalantari, Joakim & Roso, Violeta & Woxenius, Johan, 2020. "The Shipper's perspective on slow steaming - Study of Six Swedish companies," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 44-49.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • L92 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Railroads and Other Surface Transportation
    • Q50 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - General
    • Q52 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Pollution Control Adoption and Costs; Distributional Effects; Employment Effects

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhs:nhhfms:2016_021. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stein Fossen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dfnhhno.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.