IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/psewpa/halshs-01889452.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Being dependent rather than handicapped in France: Does the institutional barrier at 60 affect care arrangements?

Author

Listed:
  • Marianne Tenand

    (PSE - Paris School of Economics - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - ENPC - École des Ponts ParisTech - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement, PJSE - Paris Jourdan Sciences Economiques - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - ENPC - École des Ponts ParisTech - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)

Abstract

Individuals having difficulties to perform the activities of daily living may benefit from public long-term care (LTC) support. France distinguishes between handicap benefits, accessible to individuals below 60, and dependence schemes, for individuals aged 60 and older. This paper assesses the effects of the age 60 threshold in the French LTC policies using the French Health and Disability Survey (HS 2008{2009) in two ways. First, we estimate the effect of being 60 and older on the probability to receive non-medical formal care and informal home care, controlling for a rich set of socio-demographic characteristics and age effects. Being a \dependent elderly" rather than a \handicapped adult" little affects the probability to receive home care; however, it increases formal care utilization and, to a lesser extent, decreases the probability to receive informal care. Second, we implement a Regression Discontinuity (RD) approach and provide evidence that the institutional age threshold affects living arrangements, as individuals above age 60 are more likely to be recorded as living in an institution. The architecture of LTC policies affects the way individuals' day-to-day difficulties are being compensated, thereby undermining horizontal equity in the use of formal LTC.

Suggested Citation

  • Marianne Tenand, 2018. "Being dependent rather than handicapped in France: Does the institutional barrier at 60 affect care arrangements?," PSE Working Papers halshs-01889452, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:psewpa:halshs-01889452
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01889452
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01889452/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cécile Bourreau-Dubois & Agnès Gramain, 2014. "La solvabilisation des plans d'aide APA comme outil décentralisé d'assurance et de redistribution," Working Papers of BETA 2014-08, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    2. Steven Stern, 1995. "Estimating Family Long-Term Care Decisions in the Presence of Endogenous Child Characteristics," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 30(3), pages 551-580.
    3. Godard, Mathilde, 2016. "Gaining weight through retirement? Results from the SHARE survey," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 27-46.
    4. Cécile Bourreau-Dubois & Agnès Gramain & Helen Lim & Jingyue Xing, 2014. "Impact du reste à charge sur le volume d'heures d'aide à domicile utilisé par les bénéficiaires de l'APA," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 14024, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    5. Hoerger, Thomas J & Picone, Gabriel A & Sloan, Frank A, 1996. "Public Subsidies, Private Provision of Care and Living Arrangements of the Elderly," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 78(3), pages 428-440, August.
    6. Cécile Bourreau-Dubois & Quitterie Roquebert & Agnès Gramain, 2015. "Les disparités départementales dans la mise en oeuvre de l’APA à domicile, reflets des choix de politiques locales ?," Post-Print hal-01158419, HAL.
    7. Alain Paraponaris & Bérengère Davin & Pierre Verger, 2012. "Formal and informal care for disabled elderly living in the community: an appraisal of French care composition and costs," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 13(3), pages 327-336, June.
    8. Liliana E. Pezzin & Peter Kemper & James Reschovsky, 1996. "Does Publicly Provided Home Care Substitute for Family Care? Experimental Evidence with Endogenous Living Arrangements," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 31(3), pages 650-676.
    9. Roméo Fontaine, 2012. "The Effect of Public Subsidies for Formal Care on the Care Provision for Disabled Elderly People in France," Post-Print halshs-01227866, HAL.
    10. Joshua D. Angrist & Jörn-Steffen Pischke, 2009. "Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, number 8769.
    11. Ettner, Susan L, 1994. "The Effect of the Medicaid Home Care Benefit on Long-Term Care Choices of the Elderly," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 32(1), pages 103-127, January.
    12. Van Houtven, Courtney Harold & Norton, Edward C., 2004. "Informal care and health care use of older adults," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(6), pages 1159-1180, November.
    13. Charles, Kerwin Kofi & Sevak, Purvi, 2005. "Can family caregiving substitute for nursing home care?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 1174-1190, November.
    14. Arrighi, Yves & Davin, Bérengère & Trannoy, Alain & Ventelou, Bruno, 2015. "The non-take up of long-term care benefit in France: A pecuniary motive?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(10), pages 1338-1348.
    15. Gary Solon & Steven J. Haider & Jeffrey M. Wooldridge, 2015. "What Are We Weighting For?," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 50(2), pages 301-316.
    16. Marielle Non, 2017. "Co-payments in long-term home care: do they affect the use of care?," CPB Discussion Paper 363, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    17. Rapp, Thomas & Grand, Alain & Cantet, Christelle & Andrieu, Sandrine & Coley, Nicola & Portet, Florence & Vellas, Bruno, 2011. "Public financial support receipt and non-medical resource utilization in Alzheimer's disease results from the PLASA study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(8), pages 1310-1316, April.
    18. Rie Fujisawa & Francesca Colombo, 2009. "The Long-Term Care Workforce: Overview and Strategies to Adapt Supply to a Growing Demand," OECD Health Working Papers 44, OECD Publishing.
    19. Robin Hege & Quitterie Roquebert & Marianne Tenand, 2014. "La tarification des services d'aide à domicile : un outil au service des politiques départementales ?," Post-Print hal-01092496, HAL.
    20. Ronan Mahieu & Didier Blanchet, 2004. "Estimating Models of Retirement Behavior on French Data," NBER Chapters, in: Social Security Programs and Retirement around the World: Micro-Estimation, pages 235-284, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    21. Barnay, Thomas & Juin, Sandrine, 2016. "Does home care for dependent elderly people improve their mental health?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 149-160.
    22. Bonsang, Eric, 2009. "Does informal care from children to their elderly parents substitute for formal care in Europe?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 143-154, January.
    23. Agnès Gramain & Solène Billaud & Cécile Bourreau-Dubois & Helen Lim & Florence Weber & Jingyue Xing, 2012. "La prise en charge de la dépendance des personnes âgées: les dimensions territoriales de l'action publique," Working Papers halshs-00705569, HAL.
    24. repec:mpr:mprres:6018 is not listed on IDEAS
    25. Quitterie Roquebert & Marianne Tenand, 2017. "Pay less, consume more? The price elasticity of home care for the disabled elderly in France," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(9), pages 1162-1174, September.
    26. Liliana E. Pezzin & Barbara Steinberg Schone, 1999. "Intergenerational Household Formation, Female Labor Supply and Informal Caregiving: A Bargaining Approach," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 34(3), pages 475-503.
    27. David S. Lee & Enrico Moretti & Matthew J. Butler, 2004. "Do Voters Affect or Elect Policies? Evidence from the U. S. House," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 119(3), pages 807-859.
    28. Simon Rabaté & Julie Rochut, 2017. "Employment and Substitution Effects of Raising the Statutory Eligibility Age in France," Working Papers halshs-01622346, HAL.
    29. Marielle Non, 2017. "Co-payments in long-term home care: do they affect the use of care?," CPB Discussion Paper 363.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    30. Dhaval Dave & Inas Rashad & Jasmina Spasojevic, 2006. "The Effects of Retirement on Physical and Mental Health Outcomes," NBER Working Papers 12123, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Quitterie Roquebert & Marianne Tenand, 2017. "Pay less, consume more? The price elasticity of home care for the disabled elderly in France," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(9), pages 1162-1174, September.
    2. Elsa Perdrix & Quitterie Roquebert, 2020. "Does an increase in formal care affect informal care ? Evidence among the French elderly," Working Papers halshs-02370689, HAL.
    3. Quitterie Roquebert & Jonathan Sicsic & Thomas Rapp, 2021. "Health measures and long-term care use in the European frail population," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 22(3), pages 405-423, April.
    4. Quitterie Roquebert & Remi Kabore & Jerome Wittwer, 2018. "Decentralized policies and formal care use by the disabled elderly," PSE Working Papers halshs-01877829, HAL.
    5. Roquebert, Q. & Tenand, M., 2016. "Pay less, consume more? Estimating the price elasticity of demand for home care services of the disabled elderly," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 16/16, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    6. Barnay, Thomas & Juin, Sandrine, 2016. "Does home care for dependent elderly people improve their mental health?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 149-160.
    7. Sandrine Juin, 2016. "Care for dependent elderly people : dealing with health and financing issues," Erudite Ph.D Dissertations, Erudite, number ph16-02 edited by Thomas Barnay, December.
    8. Thomas Barnay & Sandrine Juin, 2014. "Does care to dependent elderly people living at home increase their mental health?," TEPP Working Paper 2014-06, TEPP.
    9. Sano, Kazuaki & Miyawaki, Atsushi & Abe, Kazuhiro & Jin, Xueying & Watanabe, Taeko & Tamiya, Nanako & Kobayashi, Yasuki, 2022. "Effects of cost sharing on long-term care service utilization among home-dwelling older adults in Japan," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(12), pages 1310-1316.
    10. Elsa Perdrix & Quitterie Roquebert, 2022. "Does the amount of formal care affect informal care? Evidence among over-60s in France," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 23(3), pages 453-465, April.
    11. Matteo Lippi Bruni & Cristina Ugolini, 2016. "Delegating home care for the elderly to external caregivers? An empirical study on Italian data," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 155-183, March.
    12. Louis Arnault & Andreas Goltz, 2017. "Can formal home care reduce the burden of informal care for elderly dependents? Evidence from France," Working Papers hal-01458362, HAL.
    13. David C. Grabowski & Edward C. Norton & Courtney H. Van Houtven, 2012. "Informal Care," Chapters, in: Andrew M. Jones (ed.), The Elgar Companion to Health Economics, Second Edition, chapter 30, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    14. repec:dau:papers:123456789/13164 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Bonsang, Eric, 2009. "Does informal care from children to their elderly parents substitute for formal care in Europe?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 143-154, January.
    16. Adriaan Kalwij & Giacomo Pasini & Mingqin Wu, 2014. "Home care for the elderly: the role of relatives, friends and neighbors," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 379-404, June.
    17. Matteo Lippi Bruni & Cristina Ugolini, 2016. "Delegating home care for the elderly to external caregivers? An empirical study on Italian data," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 155-183, March.
    18. Max Groneck, 2017. "Bequests and Informal Long-Term Care: Evidence from HRS Exit Interviews," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 52(2), pages 531-572.
    19. Rapp, Thomas & Ronchetti, Jérome & Sicsic, Jonathan, 2022. "Impact of formal care consumption on informal care use in Europe: What is happening at the beginning of dependency?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(7), pages 632-642.
    20. Joan Costa-Font & Sergi Jiménez-Martín & Cristina Vilaplana-Prieto, 2016. "Thinking of Incentivizing Care? The Effect of Demand Subsidies on Informal Caregiving and Intergenerational Transfers," Working Papers 2016-08, FEDEA.
    21. Barigozzi, Francesca & Cremer, Helmuth & Roeder, Kerstin, 2020. "Caregivers in the family: Daughters, sons and social norms," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    probit; Long-term care; home care; public policies; regression discontinuity design;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:psewpa:halshs-01889452. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.