IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05044566.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Supplier’s response to institutional pressure in uncertain environment: Implications for cleaner production

Author

Listed:
  • Mohit Srivastava

    (Métis Lab EM Normandie - EM Normandie - École de Management de Normandie = EM Normandie Business School)

  • Gopalakrishnan Narayanamurthy

    (University of Liverpool)

  • Roger Moser

    (Macquarie University)

  • Vijay Pereira

    (NEOMA - Neoma Business School)

  • Pascal Paille

    (NEOMA - Neoma Business School)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to understand how suppliers respond to institutional pressure in an uncertain environment and what impact do these responses have on their financial performance as well as on cleaner production. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 Tier 1 suppliers to automotive companies (OEM) in India, which is widely cited for having a highly uncertain environment. The collected data was analyzed using the grounded theory approach. Implications for the financial performance of the suppliers were examined using net profit margin data. While some tier 1 suppliers respond by adopting institutional isomorphism (acquiescence) and follow the rules of the game, others respond reactively (ignorance) and facilitate the building and strengthening of networks with low-cost suppliers (tier 2 suppliers). The adoption of reactive response was hidden by tier I suppliers from the original equipment manufacturers (OEMs). Based on the insights from data, propositions were developed on the supplier's response to institutional pressure in an uncertain environment. Current research discusses the implications that supplier's response will have on the buyer-supplier relationship and interorganizational coordination, which is expected to influence their financial performance. Although bypassing essential regulations through non-regulated suppliers can reduce the cost significantly in the short term, it is expected that non-regulated suppliers would hamper the cleaner production compliance due to lack of expertise. The current study provides unique insights for procurement managers that would change the way they coordinate with supply chain partners operating under institutional pressure in an uncertain environment and handle sustainable production. The study is novel in describing how suppliers respond to institutional pressure in environments with high uncertainty.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohit Srivastava & Gopalakrishnan Narayanamurthy & Roger Moser & Vijay Pereira & Pascal Paille, 2020. "Supplier’s response to institutional pressure in uncertain environment: Implications for cleaner production," Post-Print hal-05044566, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05044566
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124954
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05044566v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-05044566v1/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124954?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fangrong Li & Daniel Z. Ding, 2013. "The effect of institutional isomorphic pressure on the internationalization of firms in an emerging economy: evidence from China," Asia Pacific Business Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 506-525, October.
    2. Wong, Chee Yew & Boon-itt, Sakun, 2008. "The influence of institutional norms and environmental uncertainty on supply chain integration in the Thai automotive industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 400-410, October.
    3. Hughes, Mathew & Perrons, Robert K., 2011. "Shaping and re-shaping social capital in buyer-supplier relationships," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 164-171, February.
    4. Frijns, Jos & Van Vliet, Bas, 1999. "Small-Scale Industry and Cleaner Production Strategies," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 967-983, June.
    5. Wagner, Stephan M. & Bode, Christoph & Koziol, Philipp, 2009. "Supplier default dependencies: Empirical evidence from the automotive industry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(1), pages 150-161, November.
    6. Daniel A. Levinthal & James G. March, 1993. "The myopia of learning," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(S2), pages 95-112, December.
    7. Moncada, J.A. & Lukszo, Z. & Junginger, M. & Faaij, A. & Weijnen, M., 2017. "A conceptual framework for the analysis of the effect of institutions on biofuel supply chains," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P1), pages 895-915.
    8. Brian Uzzi & Ryon Lancaster, 2003. "Relational Embeddedness and Learning: The Case of Bank Loan Managers and Their Clients," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(4), pages 383-399, April.
    9. Aymo Brunetti & Beatrice Weder, 1998. "Investment and institutional uncertainty: A comparative study of different uncertainty measures," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 134(3), pages 513-533, September.
    10. Josef Kaenzig & Damien Friot & Myriam Saadé & Manuele Margni & Olivier Jolliet, 2011. "Using life cycle approaches to enhance the value of corporate environmental disclosures," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(1), pages 38-54, January.
    11. Troy R. Hawkins & Bhawna Singh & Guillaume Majeau‐Bettez & Anders Hammer Strømman, 2013. "Comparative Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Conventional and Electric Vehicles," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 17(1), pages 53-64, February.
    12. Sun Hye Lee & Kamel Mellahi & Michael J. Mol & Vijay Pereira, 2020. "No-Size-Fits-All: Collaborative Governance as an Alternative for Addressing Labour Issues in Global Supply Chains," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 162(2), pages 291-305, March.
    13. Klaus E. Meyer & Saul Estrin & Sumon Kumar Bhaumik & Mike W. Peng, 2009. "Institutions, resources, and entry strategies in emerging economies," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 61-80, January.
    14. Jabbour, Charbel Jose Chiappetta & de Sousa Jabbour, Ana Beatriz Lopes & Sarkis, Joseph, 2019. "Unlocking effective multi-tier supply chain management for sustainability through quantitative modeling: Lessons learned and discoveries to be made," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 11-30.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vi Dung Ngo & Frank Janssen & Marine Falize, 2016. "An incentive-based model of international entrepreneurship in emerging and transition economies," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 52-74, March.
    2. Silvestre, Bruno S., 2015. "Sustainable supply chain management in emerging economies: Environmental turbulence, institutional voids and sustainability trajectories," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 156-169.
    3. Caroline T Witte & Martijn J Burger & Elena I Ianchovichina & Enrico Pennings, 2019. "Correction to: Dodging bullets: The heterogeneous effect of political violence on greenfield FDI," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 50(3), pages 454-455, April.
    4. Linda Argote & Sunkee Lee & Jisoo Park, 2021. "Organizational Learning Processes and Outcomes: Major Findings and Future Research Directions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(9), pages 5399-5429, September.
    5. Caroline T Witte & Martijn J Burger & Elena I Ianchovichina & Enrico Pennings, 2017. "Dodging bullets: The heterogeneous effect of political violence on greenfield FDI," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 48(7), pages 862-892, September.
    6. Dirk Clercq & Narongsak Thongpapanl & Maxim Voronov, 2018. "Sustainability in the Face of Institutional Adversity: Market Turbulence, Network Embeddedness, and Innovative Orientation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(2), pages 437-455, March.
    7. Keith D. Brouthers & Liang Chen & Sali Li & Noman Shaheer, 2022. "Charting new courses to enter foreign markets: Conceptualization, theoretical framework, and research directions on non-traditional entry modes," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(9), pages 2088-2115, December.
    8. Kang, Yuanfei & Scott-Kennel, Joanna & Battisti, Martina & Deakins, David, 2021. "Linking inward/outward FDI and exploitation/exploration strategies: Development of a framework for SMEs," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(3).
    9. Ha Nguyen & Jorma Larimo & Douglas Dow, 2024. "The Curvilinear Impact of Cultural Friction on Foreign Divestment," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 64(2), pages 199-244, April.
    10. Li, Jing & Xia, Jun & Shapiro, Daniel & Lin, Zhouyu, 2018. "Institutional compatibility and the internationalization of Chinese SOEs: The moderating role of home subnational institutions," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(5), pages 641-652.
    11. Dung Ngo, Vi & Leonidou, Leonidas C. & Janssen, Frank & Christodoulides, Paul, 2024. "Export-specific investments, competitive advantage, and performance in Vietnamese SMEs: The moderating role of domestic market conditions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    12. Il Park, Byung & Xiao, Shufeng (Simon), 2021. "Doing good by combating bad in the digital world: Institutional pressures, anti-corruption practices, and competitive implications of MNE foreign subsidiaries," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 194-205.
    13. Qun Tan & Carlos M. P. Sousa, 2019. "Why Poor Performance is Not Enough for a Foreign Exit: The Importance of Innovation Capability and International Experience," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 59(3), pages 465-498, June.
    14. Xie, Qunyong, 2017. "Firm age, marketization, and entry mode choices of emerging economy firms: Evidence from listed firms in China," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 372-385.
    15. Bustamante, Carla V., 2019. "Strategic choices: Accelerated startups' outsourcing decisions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 359-369.
    16. Yang, Yang & Jia, Fu & Chen, Lujie & Wang, Yichuan & Xiong, Yu, 2021. "Adoption timing of OHSAS 18001 and firm performance: An institutional theory perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    17. Chen, Jian-xun & Zhang, Bo & Zhan, Wu & Sharma, Piyush & Budhwar, Pawan & Tan, Hui, 2022. "Demystifying the non-linear effect of high commitment work systems (HCWS) on firms’ strategic intention of exploratory innovation: An extended resource-based view," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    18. Justin J. P. Jansen & Gerard George & Frans A. J. Van den Bosch & Henk W. Volberda, 2008. "Senior Team Attributes and Organizational Ambidexterity: The Moderating Role of Transformational Leadership," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(5), pages 982-1007, July.
    19. Akbar, Yusaf & Balboni, Bernardo & Bortoluzzi, Guido & Dikova, Desislava & Tracogna, Andrea, 2018. "Disentangling resource and mode escalation in the context of emerging markets. Evidence from a sample of manufacturing SMEs," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 257-270.
    20. Haibin Yang & Sunny Sun & Zhiang Lin & Mike Peng, 2011. "Behind M&As in China and the United States: Networks, learning, and institutions," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 239-255, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05044566. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.