IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04093938.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Un Essai Pour Une Economie De La Pollution

Author

Listed:
  • Anjara Lalaina Jocelyn Rakotoarisoa

    (ACRODMaths)

Abstract

La question d'environnement et d'économie est un sujet qui, actuellement, figure parmi les centres des discussions les plus posées de notre ère. Dans les visions économiques du jadis, allant des mercantilistes jusqu'aux économistes modernes, la question environnementale n'avait pas encore eu cette place prépondérante. Toutefois, cette dimension a prôné sa place suite à la prise de conscience concernant les enjeux environnementaux. Le présent article tente de trouver un terrain conceptuel qui permettrait de mettre en évidence et d'une manière dynamique la relation entre la production et l'émission polluante qui, pragmatiquement, nuit au système environnemental. Les notions de fiscalité verte et de subventionnement vert, probablement des concepts nouveaux, sont au centre de cet exposé pour apporter des pistes de réflexion et des solutions pour l'arbitrage entre la production et la pollution.

Suggested Citation

  • Anjara Lalaina Jocelyn Rakotoarisoa, 2023. "Un Essai Pour Une Economie De La Pollution," Post-Print hal-04093938, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04093938
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04093938
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04093938/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tol, Richard S. J., 2005. "The marginal damage costs of carbon dioxide emissions: an assessment of the uncertainties," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(16), pages 2064-2074, November.
    2. Jonathan M. Harris & Neva R. Goodwin (ed.), 2003. "New Thinking in Macroeconomics," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 3113.
    3. Pierre Besson & Nina Kousnetzoff, 2009. "Les impacts économiques du changement climatique : enjeux de modélisation," Working Papers 2009-36, CEPII research center.
    4. Rob Dellink & Elisa Lanzi & Jean Château & Francesco Bosello & Ramiro Parrado & Kelly de Bruin, 2014. "Consequences of Climate Change Damages for Economic Growth: A Dynamic Quantitative Assessment," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1135, OECD Publishing.
    5. Andrew King & Michael Lenox, 2002. "Exploring the Locus of Profitable Pollution Reduction," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(2), pages 289-299, February.
    6. Gollop, Frank M & Roberts, Mark J, 1983. "Environmental Regulations and Productivity Growth: The Case of Fossil-Fueled Electric Power Generation," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 91(4), pages 654-674, August.
    7. Manne, Alan & Mendelsohn, Robert & Richels, Richard, 1995. "MERGE : A model for evaluating regional and global effects of GHG reduction policies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 17-34, January.
    8. Herman E. Daly, 2007. "Ecological Economics and Sustainable Development, Selected Essays of Herman Daly," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 12606.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chabowski, Brian & Chiang, Wen-Chyuan & Deng, Kailing & Sun, Li, 2019. "Environmental inefficiency and bond credit rating," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 17-37.
    2. Valentina Bosetti & Jeffrey Frankel, 2014. "Sustainable Cooperation In Global Climate Policy: Specific Formulas And Emission Targets," Climate Change Economics (CCE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 5(03), pages 1-34.
    3. Hui‐Cheng Yu & Bor‐Yuan Tsai, 2018. "Environmental policy and sustainable development: An empirical study on carbon reduction among Chinese enterprises," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5), pages 1019-1026, September.
    4. Jingmin Yao & Zhihui Yu & Zhenjun Yan & Yanfang Wang, 2025. "Verifying the “Porter Effect” of Green Credit Policy on Upstream Suppliers in the Green Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-22, February.
    5. Francis Dennig, 2018. "Climate change and the re-evaluation of cost-benefit analysis," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 151(1), pages 43-54, November.
    6. Zhang, Dongyang, 2022. "Do heterogenous subsides work differently on environmental innovation? A mechanism exploration approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    7. Tol, Richard S.J., 2006. "The Polluter Pays Principle and Cost-Benefit Analysis of Climate Change: An Application of Fund," Climate Change Modelling and Policy Working Papers 12058, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    8. Ortiz, Ramon Arigoni & Golub, Alexander & Lugovoy, Oleg & Markandya, Anil & Wang, James, 2011. "DICER: A tool for analyzing climate policies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(S1), pages 41-49.
    9. Valeria Costantini & Anil Markandya & Elena Paglialunga & Giorgia Sforna, 2018. "Impact and distribution of climatic damages: a methodological proposal with a dynamic CGE model applied to global climate negotiations," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 35(3), pages 809-843, December.
    10. Ghisetti, Claudia & Rennings, Klaus, 2013. "Environmental innovations and profitability: How does it pay to be green? An empirical analysis on the German innovation survey," ZEW Discussion Papers 13-073, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    11. Rassier, Dylan G. & Earnhart, Dietrich, 2015. "Effects of environmental regulation on actual and expected profitability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 129-140.
    12. Tol, Richard S.J., 2007. "Europe's long-term climate target: A critical evaluation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 424-432, January.
    13. Howard, Peter H. & Sterner, Thomas, 2022. "Between Two Worlds: Methodological and Subjective Differences in Climate Impact Meta-Analyses," RFF Working Paper Series 22-10, Resources for the Future.
    14. Liu, Xuewei & Yuan, Zengwei & Xu, Yuan & Jiang, Songyan, 2017. "Greening cement in China: A cost-effective roadmap," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 233-244.
    15. Otrachshenko, Vladimir & Popova, Olga, 2024. "Environment vs. Economic Growth: Do Environmental Preferences Translate Into Support for Green Parties?," IZA Discussion Papers 17475, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    16. Franck Brulhart & Sandrine Gherra & Bertrand V. Quelin, 2019. "Do Stakeholder Orientation and Environmental Proactivity Impact Firm Profitability?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 25-46, August.
    17. Steve Newbold & Charles Griffiths & Christopher C. Moore & Ann Wolverton & Elizabeth Kopits, 2010. "The "Social Cost of Carbon" Made Simple," NCEE Working Paper Series 201007, National Center for Environmental Economics, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, revised Aug 2010.
    18. Aseem Kaul & Jiao Luo, 2018. "An economic case for CSR: The comparative efficiency of for‐profit firms in meeting consumer demand for social goods," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(6), pages 1650-1677, June.
    19. Khanna, Neha & Chapman, Duane, 1997. "Climate Policy and Petroleum Depletion in an Optimal Growth Framework," Staff Papers 121172, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    20. Li, Y.P. & Huang, G.H. & Chen, X., 2011. "An interval-valued minimax-regret analysis approach for the identification of optimal greenhouse-gas abatement strategies under uncertainty," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(7), pages 4313-4324, July.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04093938. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.