IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03267359.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How does business model redesign foster resilience in emerging circular value chains?

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Carraresi

    (LEM - Lille économie management - UMR 9221 - UA - Université d'Artois - UCL - Université catholique de Lille - Université de Lille - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Stefanie Bröring

Abstract

This paper aims to elucidate how companies can innovate their business model to strengthen their resilience and timely respond to current ecosystem challenges, like the emergence of new cross-industry value chains in the circular economy. The adoption of new sustainable technologies leads to the disruption of current linear settings and to the need of business model innovation. This study draws upon a case study from the circular economy rooted in by-product valorisation and presents an innovative bio-based process enabling phosphate recovery from rapeseed oil press-cakes. Incumbent actors of established (linear) value chains have been interviewed to highlight potential business model innovation. To this end, an inductive theory-building case study approach has been applied. Results reveal that a business model redesign is needed in order to build novel circular value chains, but it depends on chain actors' capacity to adapt to change, namely to be resilient. The new value proposition needs to reach new customer targets more sensitive to sustainability issues and/or to enhance the awareness towards bio-based technological solutions into extant customers. Value creation and capture highly depend on the coordinating role of the chain actor willing to invest in the new bio-based technology, which becomes the focal company within the emergent value chain. Two scenarios are open, according to who is playing this role: if the new recovery and release process is carried out by an incumbent, the new process requires exploratory, transformative and exploitative learning together with extra investments in highly specific assets and the establishment of new cross-industry relationships to complement missing assets and knowledge about such technological breakthroughs available on the market. If a new actor enters the emerging value chain, business model innovation is mediated and moderated by a company owning both tangible and intangible resources, thus catalysing technology implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Carraresi & Stefanie Bröring, 2021. "How does business model redesign foster resilience in emerging circular value chains?," Post-Print hal-03267359, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03267359
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125823
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03267359
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-03267359/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125823?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cooper, James & Lombardi, Rachel & Boardman, David & Carliell-Marquet, Cynthia, 2011. "The future distribution and production of global phosphate rock reserves," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 78-86.
    2. Williamson, Oliver E, 1979. "Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractural Relations," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 22(2), pages 233-261, October.
    3. Nigel Roome, 1992. "Developing environmental management strategies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 1(1), pages 11-24, March.
    4. Steve Evans & Doroteya Vladimirova & Maria Holgado & Kirsten Van Fossen & Miying Yang & Elisabete A. Silva & Claire Y. Barlow, 2017. "Business Model Innovation for Sustainability: Towards a Unified Perspective for Creation of Sustainable Business Models," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(5), pages 597-608, July.
    5. Bohnsack, René & Pinkse, Jonatan & Kolk, Ans, 2014. "Business models for sustainable technologies: Exploring business model evolution in the case of electric vehicles," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 284-300.
    6. Louise Staffas & Mathias Gustavsson & Kes McCormick, 2013. "Strategies and Policies for the Bioeconomy and Bio-Based Economy: An Analysis of Official National Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(6), pages 1-19, June.
    7. Geels, Frank W. & Schot, Johan, 2007. "Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 399-417, April.
    8. Henry Chesbrough & Richard S. Rosenbloom, 2002. "The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: evidence from Xerox Corporation's technology spin-off companies," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 11(3), pages 529-555, June.
    9. John Hagedoorn & Geert Duysters, 2002. "External Sources of Innovative Capabilities: The Preferences for Strategic Alliances or Mergers and Acquisitions," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(2), pages 167-188, March.
    10. Kes McCormick & Niina Kautto, 2013. "The Bioeconomy in Europe: An Overview," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(6), pages 1-20, June.
    11. Bauwens, Thomas & Hekkert, Marko & Kirchherr, Julian, 2020. "Circular futures: What Will They Look Like?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    12. Bergek, Anna & Berggren, Christian & Magnusson, Thomas & Hobday, Michael, 2013. "Technological discontinuities and the challenge for incumbent firms: Destruction, disruption or creative accumulation?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(6), pages 1210-1224.
    13. Berg, S. & Wustmans, M. & Bröring, S., 2019. "Identifying first signals of emerging dominance in a technological innovation system: A novel approach based on patents," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 706-722.
    14. Schmid, Otto & Padel, Susanne & Levidow, Les, 2012. "The Bio-Economy Concept and Knowledge Base in a Public Goods and Farmer Perspective," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 1(1), pages 1-18, April.
    15. Alessandra De Chiara, 2016. "Eco-labeled Products: Trend or Tools for Sustainability Strategies?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 137(1), pages 161-172, August.
    16. Hosseini, Seyedmohsen & Ivanov, Dmitry & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2019. "Review of quantitative methods for supply chain resilience analysis," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 285-307.
    17. Minna Halme & Sara Lindeman & Paula Linna, 2012. "Innovation for Inclusive Business: Intrapreneurial Bricolage in Multinational Corporations," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(4), pages 743-784, June.
    18. Stefan Schaltegger & Florian Lüdeke-Freund & Erik G. Hansen, 2012. "Business cases for sustainability: the role of business model innovation for corporate sustainability," International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(2), pages 95-119.
    19. Ansari, Shahzad (Shaz) & Krop, Pieter, 2012. "Incumbent performance in the face of a radical innovation: Towards a framework for incumbent challenger dynamics," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(8), pages 1357-1374.
    20. Farla, Jacco & Markard, Jochen & Raven, Rob & Coenen, Lars, 2012. "Sustainability transitions in the making: A closer look at actors, strategies and resources," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 79(6), pages 991-998.
    21. O'Reilly, Charles A., III & Tushman, Michael L., 2013. "Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present and Future," Research Papers 2130, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    22. David J. Teece, 2007. "Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(13), pages 1319-1350, December.
    23. Raphael Amit & Christoph Zott, 2001. "Value creation in E‐business," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(6‐7), pages 493-520, June.
    24. Roundy, Philip T. & Brockman, Beverly K. & Bradshaw, Mike, 2017. "The resilience of entrepreneurial ecosystems," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 8(C), pages 99-104.
    25. Marcus Linder & Mats Williander, 2017. "Circular Business Model Innovation: Inherent Uncertainties," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(2), pages 182-196, February.
    26. Johnson, Homer H., 2003. "Does it pay to be good? Social responsibility and financial performance," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 46(6), pages 34-40.
    27. To, Chester K.M. & Au, Joe S.C. & Kan, C.W., 2019. "Uncovering business model innovation contexts: A comparative analysis by fsQCA methods," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 783-796.
    28. Sven M. Laudien & Birgit Daxböck, 2016. "Path dependence as a barrier to business model change in manufacturing firms: insights from a multiple-case study," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 86(6), pages 611-645, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Morteza Ghobakhloo & Mohammad Iranmanesh & Manuel E. Morales & Mehrbakhsh Nilashi & Azlan Amran, 2023. "Actions and approaches for enabling Industry 5.0‐driven sustainable industrial transformation: A strategy roadmap," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 1473-1494, May.
    2. Ingvild Reine Assmann & Francesco Rosati & Sandra Naomi Morioka, 2023. "Determinants of circular business model adoption—A systematic literature review," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 6008-6028, December.
    3. Lei Zhu & Jing Hu & Jiahui Xu & Yannan Li & Mangmang Liang, 2022. "Spatial Distribution Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Pro-Poor Tourism Villages in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-20, November.
    4. Kristina Stoiber & Kurt Matzler & Julia Hautz, 2023. "Ambidextrous structures paving the way for disruptive business models: a conceptual framework," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1439-1485, May.
    5. Henk Ruiter & Frank De Feijter & Koos Wagensveld, 2021. "Management Control and Business Model Innovation in the Context of a Circular Economy in the Dutch Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria Rosa De Giacomo & Raimund Bleischwitz, 2020. "Business models for environmental sustainability: Contemporary shortcomings and some perspectives," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3352-3369, December.
    2. Nhat Strøm-Andersen, 2019. "Incumbents in the Transition Towards the Bioeconomy: The Role of Dynamic Capabilities and Innovation Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-20, September.
    3. Ignė Stalmokaitė & Tommy Larsson Segerlind & Johanna Yliskylä‐Peuralahti, 2023. "Revival of wind‐powered shipping: Comparing the early‐stage innovation process of an incumbent and a newcomer firm," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 958-975, February.
    4. Thomas Magnusson & Viktor Werner, 2023. "Conceptualisations of incumbent firms in sustainability transitions: Insights from organisation theory and a systematic literature review," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 903-919, February.
    5. Belussi, Fiorenza & Orsi, Luigi & Savarese, Maria, 2019. "Mapping Business Model Research: A Document Bibliometric Analysis," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(3).
    6. Block, Carolin & Wustmans, Michael & Laibach, Natalie & Bröring, Stefanie, 2021. "Semantic bridging of patents and scientific publications – The case of an emerging sustainability-oriented technology," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    7. Florian Hofmann & Dodo zu Knyphausen‐Aufseß, 2022. "Circular business model experimentation capabilities—A case study approach," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2469-2488, July.
    8. Sebastian Schroedel, 2023. "The Sustainable Business Model Database: 92 Patterns That Enable Sustainability in Business Model Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-27, May.
    9. Engwall, Mats & Kaulio, Matti & Karakaya, Emrah & Miterev, Maxim & Berlin, Daniel, 2021. "Experimental networks for business model innovation: A way for incumbents to navigate sustainability transitions?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    10. Onsongo, Elsie K. & Knorringa, Peter & van Beers, Cees, 2023. "Frugal business model innovation in the Base of the Pyramid: The case of Philips Community Life Centres in Africa," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    11. Arash Rezazadeh & Ana Carvalho, 2018. "A value-based approach to business model innovation: Defining the elements of the concept," NIPE Working Papers 12/2018, NIPE - Universidade do Minho.
    12. Daliborka Witschel & Aaron Döhla & Maximilian Kaiser & Kai-Ingo Voigt & Thilo Pfletschinger, 2019. "Riding on the wave of digitization: insights how and under what settings dynamic capabilities facilitate digital-driven business model change," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 89(8), pages 1023-1095, December.
    13. Florian Lüdeke‐Freund, 2020. "Sustainable entrepreneurship, innovation, and business models: Integrative framework and propositions for future research," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 665-681, February.
    14. Yuan Jing, 2022. "The Relationship Between Business Model Innovation and Operational Performance of Incubator Enterprise," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 16(1), pages 153-191.
    15. Giachetti, Claudio & Mensah, Deborah Tiniwah, 2023. "Catching-up during technological windows of opportunity: An industry product categories perspective," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(2).
    16. Jonathan H. Reed, 2022. "Operational and strategic change during temporary turbulence: evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 589-608, June.
    17. Daniela Pasnicu & Mihaela Ghenta & Aniela Matei, 2019. "Transition to Bioeconomy: Perceptions and Behaviors in Central and Eastern Europe," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 21(50), pages 1-9, February.
    18. Coskun-Setirek, Abide & Tanrikulu, Zuhal, 2021. "Digital innovations-driven business model regeneration: A process model," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    19. Palo, Teea & Åkesson, Maria & Löfberg, Nina, 2019. "Servitization as business model contestation: A practice approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 486-496.
    20. Anna M. Hansson & Eja Pedersen & Niklas P. E. Karlsson & Stefan E. B. Weisner, 2023. "Barriers and drivers for sustainable business model innovation based on a radical farmland change scenario," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(8), pages 8083-8106, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Business model innovation; Cross-industry relationships; Sustainability transition; Value creation; By-product valorisation; Resilience;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03267359. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.