IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/cesptp/hal-05406605.html

Central Securities Depositories and Geopolitical Risks Challenges for European Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Olena Havrylchyk

    (CES - Centre d'économie de la Sorbonne - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne)

Abstract

Central Securities Depositories (CSDs) form the backbone of financial market infrastructure by registering securities, settling trades, distributing cash flows, and managing collateral. While often regarded as mere financial "plumbing," they in fact underpin strategic objectives such as advancing the Savings and Investment Union, curbing tax evasion, and reinforcing Europe's geopolitical stance. The academic and policy debate on CSDs is fragmented across three strands of literature that rarely intersect. From a regulatory perspective, concerns focus on the persistent fragmentation of the EU CSD market. From a political economy perspective, omnibus accounts and opaque custody chains are criticized for facilitating tax evasion. From a geopolitical perspective, Euroclear – the EU's largest International CSD – has been thrust into the spotlight for its central role in immobilizing and freezing Russian assets after the 2022 invasion of Ukraine. This Paper brings these three strands of literature together to identify and analyze the key challenges facing European policymakers.

Suggested Citation

  • Olena Havrylchyk, 2025. "Central Securities Depositories and Geopolitical Risks Challenges for European Policy," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-05406605, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:cesptp:hal-05406605
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05406605v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-05406605v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Filip Novokmet & Thomas Piketty & Gabriel Zucman, 2018. "From Soviets to oligarchs: inequality and property in Russia 1905-2016," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 16(2), pages 189-223, June.
    2. Anton Badev & Maria Baird & Timothy Brezinski & Clinton Chen & Max Ellithorpe & Linda Fahy & Vanessa Kargenian & Kimberley Liao & Brendan Malone & Jeffrey C. Marquardt & David C. Mills & Wendy Ng & An, 2016. "Distributed Ledger Technology in Payments, Clearing, and Settlement," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2016-095, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    3. Tapking, Jens & Yang, Jing, 2006. "Horizontal and Vertical Integration in Securities Trading and Settlement," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 38(7), pages 1765-1795, October.
    4. David Yermack, 2017. "Corporate Governance and Blockchains," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 21(1), pages 7-31.
    5. Coste, Charles-Enguerrand & Tcheng, Céline & Vansieleghem, Ingmar, 2021. "One size fits some: analysing profitability, capital and liquidity constraints of custodian banks through the lens of the SREP methodology," Occasional Paper Series 256, European Central Bank.
    6. Theresa Neef & Panayiotis Nicolaides & Lucas Chancel & Thomas Piketty & Gabriel Zucman, 2022. "Effective sanctions against oligarchs and the role of a European Asset Registry," Notes 003, EU Tax Observatory.
    7. Droll, Thomas & Podlich, Natalia & Wedow, Michael, 2016. "Out of sight, out of mind? On the risk of sub-custodian structures," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 47-56.
    8. Krahnke, Tobias & Ferrari Minesso, Massimo & Mehl, Arnaud & Vansteenkiste, Isabel, 2024. "Seizing central bank assets?," CEPR Discussion Papers 19186, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    9. Theresa Neef & Thomas Piketty & Gabriel Zucman & Lucas Chancel & Panayioti Nicolaides, 2022. "Effective sanctions against oligarchs and the role of a European Asset Registry," Sciences Po Economics Publications (main) halshs-04103916, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dulani Jayasuriya Daluwathumullagamage & Alexandra Sims, 2020. "Blockchain-Enabled Corporate Governance and Regulation," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-41, June.
    2. Franklin Allen & Xian Gu & Julapa Jagtiani, 2021. "A Survey of Fintech Research and Policy Discussion," Review of Corporate Finance, now publishers, vol. 1(3-4), pages 259-339, July.
    3. Li, Shaofang & Marinč, Matej, 2018. "Economies of scale and scope in financial market infrastructures," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 17-49.
    4. Anil Savio Kavuri & Alistair Milne, 2019. "Fintech and the Future of Financial Services: What Are the Research Gaps?," CAMA Working Papers 2019-18, Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    5. Ilya Ivaninskiy & Irina Ivashkovskaya & Joseph A. McCahery, 2023. "Does digitalization mitigate or intensify the principal-agent conflict in a firm?," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 27(3), pages 695-725, September.
    6. Albers, Thilo & Bartels, Charlotte & Schularick, Moritz, 2022. "Wealth and its Distribution in Germany, 1895-2018," CEPR Discussion Papers 17269, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    7. Lin William Cong & Zhiguo He & Jiasun Li & Wei Jiang, 2021. "Decentralized Mining in Centralized Pools [Concentrating on the fall of the labor share]," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 34(3), pages 1191-1235.
    8. Giulio Cornelli, 2025. "When bricks meet bytes: does tokenisation fill gaps in traditional real estate markets?," BIS Working Papers 1311, Bank for International Settlements.
    9. Wang, Chengfu & Chen, Xiangfeng & Xu, Xun & Jin, Wei, 2023. "Financing and operating strategies for blockchain technology-driven accounts receivable chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(3), pages 1279-1295.
    10. Hubert Tworzecki, 2019. "Poland: A Case of Top-Down Polarization," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 681(1), pages 97-119, January.
    11. Coste, Charles-Enguerrand, 2024. "Toss a stablecoin to your banker - Stablecoins’ impact on banks’ balance sheets and prudential ratios," Occasional Paper Series 353, European Central Bank.
    12. Dominika Langenmayr & Mikayel Tovmasyan & Sebastian Vosseler, 2025. "Bypassing Sanctions: Hide 'N Seek in Tax Havens?," Working Papers 202536, Center for Global Policy Analysis, LeBow College of Business, Drexel University.
    13. Siti Sakinah Azizan & Marzlin Marzuki & Muslimah Mohd Jamil & Roshidah Safeei, 2025. "Navigating Accounting for Digital Assets: The Mediating Role of Regulatory Clarity in Enhancing Financial Reporting Quality in Malaysia," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(9), pages 3829-3837, September.
    14. Foucault, Thierry & Gambacorta, Leonardo & Jiang, Wei & Vives, Xavier, 2025. "Barcelona 7: Artificial Intelligence in Finance," HEC Research Papers Series 1599, HEC Paris.
    15. Siranova, Maria & Tiruneh, Menbere Workie & Fisera, Boris, 2021. "Creating the illicit capital flows network in Europe – Do the net errors and omissions follow an economic pattern?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 955-973.
    16. Bhuiyan, Rubaiyat Ahsan & Husain, Afzol & Zhang, Changyong, 2021. "A wavelet approach for causal relationship between bitcoin and conventional asset classes," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    17. Komulainen, Ruey & Nätti, Satu, 2023. "Barriers to blockchain adoption: Empirical observations from securities services value network," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    18. Olivier Meier & Aurélie Sannajust, 0. "The smart contract revolution: a solution for the holdup problem?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-16.
    19. Vasilios Plakandaras & Elie Bouri & Rangan Gupta, 2019. "Forecasting Bitcoin Returns: Is there a Role for the U.S. – China Trade War?," Working Papers 201980, University of Pretoria, Department of Economics.
    20. Quy-Thuan Bui & Son-Tung Le, 2025. "Barriers to Blockchain Technology Implementation in Small and Medium-Sized Logistics Enterprises," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, August.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:cesptp:hal-05406605. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.