IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fpr/ifprid/1958.html

Spousal concordance in joint and separate households: Survey evidence from Nepal

Author

Listed:
  • Ambler, Kate
  • Doss, Cheryl R.
  • Kieran, Caitlin
  • Passarelli, Simone

Abstract

Using data from Nepal, we analyze patterns of concordance between spouses on survey questions regarding asset ownership and decision making separately for households in which a respondent couple lives with the husband’s parents and those in which they do not. We consider concordance regarding both the roles of women respondents and the roles of people other than the respondent couple. We find that discordance regarding women’s roles is both substantial and systematic; women are much more likely than men to report women’s participation in asset ownership and decision making, and this qualitative pattern is similar across household types. Regarding the role of others, the modal response in joint households is concordance that others own assets and make decisions. However, women are more likely than men to acknowledge this role of others. Next, we find that spousal concordance that women have a role, and wives reporting they have a role while their husbands say that they do not, are both correlated with some improved measures of well-being. In households with in-laws present, concordance that others are involved is correlated with worse outcomes for women. These results highlight that spousal concordance is not necessarily indicative of women's well-being, especially in joint households.

Suggested Citation

  • Ambler, Kate & Doss, Cheryl R. & Kieran, Caitlin & Passarelli, Simone, 2020. "Spousal concordance in joint and separate households: Survey evidence from Nepal," IFPRI discussion papers 1958, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    • Handle: RePEc:fpr:ifprid:1958
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/143541
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna Josephson, 2025. "Intra-household management of resources: evidence from Malawi," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 165-194, March.
    2. Ben D’Exelle & Liz Ignowski, 2023. "Friends in the village:do they matter for women’s involvement in household decisions?," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 36(4), pages 3005-3028, October.
    3. Kalyani Raghunathan & Mai Mahmoud & Jessica Heckert & Gayathri Ramani & Greg Seymour, 2025. "Do Estimates of Women’s Control over Income and Decisionmaking Vary Across Nationally Representative Survey Programs?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 179(1), pages 95-122, August.
    4. Balayar, Ramesh & Mazur, Robert, 2021. "Women’s decision-making roles in vegetable production, marketing and income utilization in Nepal’s hills communities," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 21(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fpr:ifprid:1958. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifprius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.