IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eti/dpaper/26014.html

Marriage, Fertility, and Female Labor Force Participation in an Aging Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Toama Boke Aime ARNAULD
  • Junichi FUJIMOTO
  • Minchung HSU

Abstract

Japan faces a dual demographic challenge: persistently low fertility and underutilization of female labor. This paper develops a quantitative life-cycle model with heterogeneous agents to study how the spousal tax system and the social norm of unequal gender division of childcare jointly shape marriage, fertility, and women’s labor supply decisions. The model incorporates endogenous marriage, fertility, and female labor participation choices, calibrated to Japanese data, and evaluates a series of counterfactual policy experiments. We find that the spousal tax treatment is a key disincentive to women’s labor market participation. Eliminating tax benefits and deductions increases female labor supply but reduces marriage and fertility. Childcare subsidies partly offset these effects by raising household resources and encouraging women’s market participation, though their effectiveness is limited in the presence of restrictive social norms. Once the childcare norm is relaxed, however, subsidies become more effective: they simultaneously raise fertility, stabilize marriage, and boost women’s labor supply across all life stages. These findings suggest that achieving both higher fertility and higher female labor force participation in Japan requires a dual strategy: financial support for childrearing and broader institutional and cultural reforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Toama Boke Aime ARNAULD & Junichi FUJIMOTO & Minchung HSU, 2026. "Marriage, Fertility, and Female Labor Force Participation in an Aging Economy," Discussion papers 26014, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
  • Handle: RePEc:eti:dpaper:26014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rieti.go.jp/jp/publications/dp/26e014.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sagiri KITAO & Minamo MIKOSHIBA, 2022. "Why Women Work the Way They Do in Japan: Roles of Fiscal Policies," Discussion papers 22016, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    2. Marco Francesconi, 2002. "A Joint Dynamic Model of Fertility and Work of Married Women," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 20(2), pages 336-380, Part.
    3. Yukiko Abe & Akiko Sato Oishi, 2009. "The 1.03 million yen ceiling and earnings inequality among married women in Japan," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 29(2), pages 1510-1519.
    4. Fernandez, Cristina & Sevilla-Sanz, Almudena, 2006. "Social norms and household time allocation," IESE Research Papers D/648, IESE Business School.
    5. Sunha Myong & JungJae Park & Junjian Yi, 2021. "Social Norms and Fertility," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 19(5), pages 2429-2466.
    6. Gobbi, Paula E., 2018. "Childcare and commitment within households," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 503-551.
    7. Gunji, Hiroshi & Miyazaki, Kenji, 2011. "Estimates of average marginal tax rates on factor incomes in Japan," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 81-106, June.
    8. Seongeun Kim & Michèle Tertilt & Minchul Yum, 2024. "Status Externalities in Education and Low Birth Rates in Korea," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 114(6), pages 1576-1611, June.
    9. Minchung Hsu & Thu Trang Le, 2024. "Fertility decisions and the norm of intergenerational support to aging parents," International Studies of Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(1), pages 151-165, March.
    10. Becker, Gary S, 1974. "A Theory of Marriage: Part II," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 82(2), pages 11-26, Part II, .
    11. Yokoyama, Izumi, 2018. "How the tax reform on the special exemption for spouse affected the work-hour distribution," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 69-84.
    12. Gary S. Becker, 1960. "An Economic Analysis of Fertility," NBER Chapters, in: Demographic and Economic Change in Developed Countries, pages 209-240, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. Ananth Seshadri & Nicolas Roys, 2014. "On the Origin and Causes of Economic Growth," 2014 Meeting Papers 310, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cevat Giray Aksoy & Jose Maria Barrero & Nicholas Bloom & Katelyn Cranney & Steven J. Davis & Mathias Dolls & Pablo Zarate, 2026. "Work from Home and Fertility," Working Papers 2026-36, Becker Friedman Institute for Research In Economics.
    2. Rania Gihleb & Osnat Lifshitz, 2022. "Dynamic Effects of Educational Assortative Mating on Labor Supply," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 46, pages 302-327, October.
    3. María Davia & Nuria Legazpe, 2015. "Educational attainment and maternity in Spain: not only “when” but also “how”," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 871-900, December.
    4. Jara-Díaz, Sergio & Rosales-Salas, Jorge, 2017. "Beyond transport time: A review of time use modeling," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 209-230.
    5. Wojciech Charemza & Svetlana Makarova & Imran Shah, 2015. "Making the most of high inflation," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(34-35), pages 3723-3739, July.
    6. Jungho Lee & Sunha Myong, 2026. "Workplace Norms and Fertility," Working papers 2026rwp-277, Yonsei University, Yonsei Economics Research Institute.
    7. Fletcher, Jason M. & Polos, Jessica, 2017. "Nonmarital and Teen Fertility," IZA Discussion Papers 10833, IZA Network @ LISER.
    8. Slonimczyk, Fabián & Yurko, Anna, 2014. "Assessing the impact of the maternity capital policy in Russia," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 265-281.
    9. Cäcilia Lipowski & Ralf A. Wilke & Bertrand Koebel, 2020. "Exploring the Puzzle of Human Reproduction: Register Data based Evidence from France and Germany," Working Papers of BETA 2020-24, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    10. Taehoon Kim, 2026. "The impact of shadow education expenditures on fertility rates in South Korea," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 39(1), pages 1-36, March.
    11. Gunji, Hiroshi & Miyazaki, Kenji, 2017. "Why do Japanese women work so much less than Japanese men? A business cycle accounting approach," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 45-55.
    12. Paul Cahu & Falilou Fall & Roland Pongou, 2014. "Beauty, Polygyny, and Fertility: Theory and Evidence," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 14078, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    13. Bisin, Alberto & Tura, Giulia, 2019. "Marriage, Fertility, and Cultural Integration in Italy," CEPR Discussion Papers 14179, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    14. Jérôme Adda & Christian Dustmann & Katrien Stevens, 2017. "The Career Costs of Children," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 125(2), pages 293-337.
    15. Gonzalez, Libertad, 2007. "The effect of benefits on single motherhood in Europe," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 393-412, June.
    16. Taryn Ann Galloway & Rannveig Kaldager Hart, 2015. "Effects of income and the cost of children on fertility. Quasi-experimental evidence from Norway," Discussion Papers 828, Statistics Norway, Research Department.
    17. Libertad González Luna, 2005. "The determinants of the prevalence of single mothers: A cross-country analysis," Economics Working Papers 876, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    18. Powdthavee, Nattavudh & Oswald, Andrew J. & Lockwood, Ben, 2024. "Are environmental concerns deterring people from having children? Longitudinal evidence on births in the UK," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    19. Olivetti, Claudia & Pan, Jessica & Petrongolo, Barbara, 2024. "The evolution of gender in the labor market," Handbook of Labor Economics,, Elsevier.
    20. Marcus Klemm, 2012. "Job Security and Fertility: Evidence from German Reunification," Ruhr Economic Papers 0379, Rheinisch-Westfälisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universität Dortmund, Universität Duisburg-Essen.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eti:dpaper:26014. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: TANIMOTO, Toko (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rietijp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.