IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eid/wpaper/58172.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Economic valuation of benefits from the proposed REACH restriction of intentionally added microplastics

Author

Listed:
  • Peter King

    (University of Bath)

  • Alistair Hunt

    (University of Bath)

  • Stavros Georgiou
  • Caroline Rainsford
  • Richard Dean

Abstract

This study elicited the willingness to pay (WTP) for measures to control the release of intentionally added microplastics. Although microplastics accumulate in the marine environment and are practically unrecoverable, there is considerable scientific uncertainty about their environmental and health effects. This study used both a Choice Experiment (CE) and Contingent Valuation (CV) to evaluate where it was more beneficial to target restrictions at source or emissions. The CE investigated source-control in evaluating how respondents accept a trade-off between the price and performance of cosmetic products when reformulated to reduce the use of microplastics. Two CV tasks then estimated the benefits of research to resolve the uncertainty, and the benefits of upgrading Wastewater Treatment Plants (WWTP) to retain more microplastics. The difference in the annual CV WTP; £53.24 for research and £73.71 respectively, suggests that respondents are willing to pay a substantial premium for the precautionary abatement of microplastics.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter King & Alistair Hunt & Stavros Georgiou & Caroline Rainsford & Richard Dean, 2021. "Economic valuation of benefits from the proposed REACH restriction of intentionally added microplastics," Department of Economics Working Papers 81/21, University of Bath, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:eid:wpaper:58172
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://purehost.bath.ac.uk/ws/files/218074684/JMP_WP_PDF.pdf
    File Function: Other version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eid:wpaper:58172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Scholarly Communications Librarian (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/debatuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.