IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/wpaper/116401.html

Performance and mechanisms of the Maoist economy: a holistic approach, 1950-1980

Author

Listed:
  • Deng, Kent
  • Shen, Jim Huangnan
  • Guo, Jingyuan

Abstract

This article probes performance and mechanisms of the Maoist economy from 1950 to 1980, a period commonly regarded as a turning point that ushered in a bumpy but new path for China’s new economic fortune, including industrialisation and modernisation. Mao and his government have often been regarded as a developer and moderniser for China. This study questions it. To that end, the Maoist economy is re-conceptualised, re-examined, and re-assessed with qualitative and quantitative evidence including empirical modelling. The key findings suggest that the Maoist economy was a closed one with industrial dependence on agriculture in an urbanrural zero-sum. In the end, despite the official propaganda agriculture declined, industrial workforce stagnated, and the population was poor. This gloomy performance justified the post-Mao reforms and opening up, a game changer that put China on a very different trajectory of growth and development.

Suggested Citation

  • Deng, Kent & Shen, Jim Huangnan & Guo, Jingyuan, 2022. "Performance and mechanisms of the Maoist economy: a holistic approach, 1950-1980," Economic History Working Papers 116401, London School of Economics and Political Science, Department of Economic History.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:wpaper:116401
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/116401/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. Wilhelm, 1979. "Does the Soviet Union have a planned economy?," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(2), pages 268-274.
    2. Lardy,Nicholas R., 1978. "Economic Growth and Distribution in China," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521219044, November.
    3. Dittrich, Scott R & Myers, Ramon H, 1971. "Resource Allocation in Traditional Agriculture: Republican China, 1937-1940," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 79(4), pages 887-896, July-Aug..
    4. Paine, Suzanne, 1976. "Balanced development: Maoist conception and Chinese practice," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 4(4), pages 277-304, April.
    5. S. G. Wheatcroft & R. W. Davies & J. M. Cooper, 1986. "Soviet Industrialization Reconsidered: Some Preliminary Conclusions about Economic Development between 1926 and 1941," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 39(2), pages 264-294, May.
    6. anonymous, 1987. "Real economic developments and the balance of payments," Reserve Bank of New Zealand Bulletin, Reserve Bank of New Zealand, vol. 50, june.
    7. Clem Tisdell, 2009. "Economic Reform and Openness in China: China’s Development Policies in the Last 30 Years," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 271-294, September.
    8. Zsófia L. Bárány & Christian Siegel, 2018. "Job Polarization and Structural Change," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 10(1), pages 57-89, January.
    9. Muller, A L, 1978. "Quesnay's Theory of Growth: A Comment," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 30(1), pages 150-156, March.
    10. Eagly, Robert V, 1969. "A Physiocratic Model of Dynamic Equilibrium," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 77(1), pages 66-84, Jan./Feb..
    11. Enrico Bellino & Saverio M. Fratini, 2022. "Absolute advantages and capital mobility in international trade theory," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 271-293, March.
    12. Jane Du & Kent Deng, 2017. "Getting food prices right: the state versus the market in reforming China, 1979–2006," European Review of Economic History, European Historical Economics Society, vol. 21(3), pages 302-325.
    13. Charles Hoffmann, 1971. "The Maoist Economic Model," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(3), pages 12-27, September.
    14. de Zwart, Pim & Gallardo-Albarrán, Daniel & Rijpma, Auke, 2022. "The Demographic Effects of Colonialism: Forced Labor and Mortality in Java, 1834–1879," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 82(1), pages 211-249, March.
    15. Roy J. Ruffin, 2002. "David Ricardo's Discovery of Comparative Advantage," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 34(4), pages 727-748, Winter.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Roser Alvarez-Klee & Ramon Ramon-Muñoz, 2024. "Demographic crises during the Maoist period. A case study of the Great Flood of 1975 and the forgotten famine," Working Papers 0269, European Historical Economics Society (EHES).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:ehl:lserod:116401 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Sergio Parrinello, 2025. "On Some “New” Interpretations of Ricardo’s Principle of Comparative Advantages," Springer Studies in the History of Economic Thought, in: Muriel Dal Pont Legrand & Sandye Gloria (ed.), 40 Years of Economics, pages 185-199, Springer.
    3. Machado, Pedro S. & Trigg, Andrew B., 2021. "On absolute and comparative advantage in international trade: A Pasinetti pure labour approach," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 375-383.
    4. Chunli Shen & Jing Jin & Heng-fu Zou, 2012. "Fiscal Decentralization in China: History, Impact, Challenges and Next Steps," Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF, vol. 13(1), pages 1-51, May.
    5. Fadun Solomon Olajide, 2014. "Cultural Awareness, a Form of Risk Management in International Business: Case Study of China," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 4(1), pages 266-288, June.
    6. Deng, Kent & Shen, Jim Huangnan, 2019. "From state resource allocation to a 'low-level equilibrium trap': re-evaluation of economic performance of Mao's China, 1949-78," Economic History Working Papers 101127, London School of Economics and Political Science, Department of Economic History.
    7. Dariusz Kotlewski, 2022. "Przesłanki za wykorzystaniem rachunkowości wzrostu gospodarczego w badaniu specjalizacji regionalnych," Ekonomista, Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne, issue 2, pages 235-258.
    8. Serrano, Franklin & Mazat, Numa, 2013. "Quesnay and the analysis of the surplus in an agrarian capitalist economy," MPRA Paper 47781, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Sherwin Rosen, 1999. "Potato Paradoxes," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 107(S6), pages 294-313, December.
      • Rosen, Sherwin, 1997. "Potato Paradoxes," Working Papers 135, The University of Chicago Booth School of Business, George J. Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State.
    10. Casey B. Mulligan, 1999. "Galton versus the Human Capital Approach to Inheritance," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 107(S6), pages 184-224, December.
    11. Jacobo Ferrer & Adrián Martínez-González & Luis Daniel Torres-González, 2024. "On the Role of Profits-Wages Ratios in the Determination of the Long-Run Behavior of International Relative Prices," Centro Sraffa Working Papers CSWP67, Centro di Ricerche e Documentazione 'Piero Sraffa'.
    12. Kai-yuen Tsui, 2006. "Forces Shaping China's Interprovincial Inequality," WIDER Working Paper Series RP2006-128, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    13. Henry Thompson, 2023. "Multilateral Comparative Advantage," Auburn Economics Working Paper Series auwp2023-07, Department of Economics, Auburn University.
    14. Federico Riccio & Lorenzo Cresti & Maria Enrica Virgillito, 2025. "The labour share along global value chains: perspectives and evidence from sectoral interdependence," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 161(2), pages 635-684, May.
    15. Michele Battisti & Christian Dustmann & Uta Schönberg, 2023. "Technological and Organizational Change and the Careers of Workers," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 21(4), pages 1551-1594.
    16. Bárány, Zsófia L. & Siegel, Christian, 2020. "Biased technological change and employment reallocation," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    17. Dumitriu, Ramona & Stefanescu, Răzvan, 2016. "Strategic decisions on industrialization: case of Galati Steel Works," MPRA Paper 89007, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2016.
    18. Maneschi, Andrea, 2004. "The true meaning of David Ricardo's four magic numbers," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 433-443, March.
    19. García-Peñalosa, Cecilia & Petit, Fabien & van Ypersele, Tanguy, 2023. "Can workers still climb the social ladder as middling jobs become scarce? Evidence from two British cohorts," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    20. Amélie Allegre & Oana Borcan & Christa Brunnschweiler, 2025. "Gendered Impacts of Colonial Education: the Role of Access and Norms Transmission in French Morocco," Working Paper Series 20225, Department of Economics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
    21. Yasheng Huang, 2001. "Economic Fragmentation and FDI in China," William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series 374, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • H57 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Procurement
    • N15 - Economic History - - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics; Industrial Structure; Growth; Fluctuations - - - Asia including Middle East
    • N35 - Economic History - - Labor and Consumers, Demography, Education, Health, Welfare, Income, Wealth, Religion, and Philanthropy - - - Asia including Middle East
    • O21 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - Planning Models; Planning Policy
    • O41 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - One, Two, and Multisector Growth Models
    • P21 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist and Transition Economies - - - Planning, Coordination, and Reform

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:wpaper:116401. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager on behalf of EH Dept. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/chlseuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.