Constraint and opportunity: identifying voluntary non-employment
This paper is an attempt to assess the extent to which the behaviour of an individual is the result of the constraints that he or she faces – factors beyond individual control - or the result of the exercise of his or her preferences. The study concentrates on participation or non-participation in employment, with non-participation defined broadly to include fulltime education, caring or early retirement, as well as unemployment. Following a discussion of potential methodological difficulties, data from the British Household Panel Study are used to construct models of the probability of being in employment, controlling for various constraints. Starting from the position that all non-employment is voluntary, possible constraints are introduced in layers corresponding to the degree to which they are regarded as beyond individual control. The layered approach allows for the fact that opinions vary as to what factors it is appropriate to regard as constraints. Predicted probabilities of being in employment are then compared to each individual’s actual state. If the model predicts that he or she has a high probability of being in work, and in fact he or she is not, then there is a prima facie case that she or he is voluntarily out of work. However, since there may be unobserved constraints, the outcome is cross-checked by starting from the opposite position, namely that all non-employment is involuntary, then gradually subtracting those for whom there is evidence of having chosen to be out of work. Only those who are found not to face significant constraints and who state that they do not want work can with confidence be asserted to be voluntarily non-employed. The results suggest that after taking into account as many constraints as possible, one-tenth of the non-employment in our sample is unambiguously voluntary, with a further one-tenth being indeterminate.
|Date of creation:||Apr 2002|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: LSE Library Portugal Street London, WC2A 2HD, U.K.|
Phone: +44 (020) 7405 7686
Web page: http://www.lse.ac.uk/
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Sen, Amartya, 1995. "Inequality Reexamined," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198289289, April.
- Nolan, Brian & Whelan, Christopher T., 1996. "Resources, Deprivation, and Poverty," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198287858, April.
- Haveman, Robert & Bershadker, Andrew, 1998. "Self-Reliance as a Poverty Criterion: Trends in Earnings-Capacity Poverty, 1975-1992," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 88(2), pages 342-347, May.
- Sen, Amartya, 1984. "The Living Standard," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 36(0), pages 74-90, Supplemen.
- Hahn, F H, 1987. "On Involuntary Unemployment," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 97(388a), pages 1-16, Supplemen.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:4650. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (LSERO Manager)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.