IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/dij/wpfarg/1051202.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

L’encastrement institutionnel des procédures de recours internes en organisation

Author

Listed:
  • Samuel Mercier

    () (Université de Bourgogne)

  • Renaud Muller

    (ESC Dijon)

Abstract

Cet article explore les limites de l’implantation d’une procédure organisationnelle anglo-saxonne de règlement de litiges interpersonnels dans le contexte français. Visant à mieux intégrer le souci d’équité, de telles procédures se sont très largement développés depuis les années 1970 aux Etats-Unis où elles prennent la dénomination de « non union grievance procedures ». Elles donnent la possibilité pour un salarié, qui renonce alors à tout appui syndical, de remettre en cause la décision de ses supérieurs hiérarchiques et d’informer les dirigeants de l’existence d’une situation illégale ou contraire à la politique éthique de l’entreprise.

Suggested Citation

  • Samuel Mercier & Renaud Muller, 2005. "L’encastrement institutionnel des procédures de recours internes en organisation," Working Papers CREGO 1051202, Université de Bourgogne - CREGO EA7317 Centre de recherches en gestion des organisations.
  • Handle: RePEc:dij:wpfarg:1051202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://crego.u-bourgogne.fr/images/stories/wp/1051202.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:dau:papers:123456789/10055 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Samuel Mercier, 2001. "Institutionnaliser l'éthique dans les grandes entreprises françaises ?," Post-Print hal-00155570, HAL.
    3. repec:dau:papers:123456789/3306 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • J52 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining - - - Dispute Resolution: Strikes, Arbitration, and Mediation
    • M12 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Personnel Management; Executives; Executive Compensation

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dij:wpfarg:1051202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Angèle RENAUD). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.