IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/dbm/wpaper/21-009.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Domestic Energy Consumption in Ghana: Deprivation versus Likelihood of Access

Author

Listed:
  • Alhassan A. Karakara

    (Cape Coast)

  • Evans S. Osabuohien

    (Ota, Nigeria)

  • Simplice A. Asongu

    (Pretoria, South Africa)

Abstract

Purpose – This paper analyses the extent to which households are deprived (or otherwise) of clean energy sources in Ghana. Design/methodology/approach – It engages the Ghana Demographic and Health Survey data (GDHS VI). Three different energy deprivation indicators were estimated: cooking fuel deprivation, lighting deprivation and indoor air pollution. The empirical evidence is based on logit regressions that explain whether households are deprived or not. Findings – The results show that energy deprivation or access is contingent on the area of residence. Energy access and deprivation in Ghana show some regional disparities, even though across every region, the majority of households use three fuel types: Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG), charcoal and wood cut. Increases in wealth and education lead to reduction in the likelihood of being energy deprived. Thus, efforts should be geared towards policies that will ensure households having access to clean fuels to reduce the attendant deprivations and corresponding effects of using dangerous or dirty fuels. Originality/value – This study complements the extant literature by analysing the extent to which households are deprived (or otherwise) of clean energy sources in Ghana.

Suggested Citation

  • Alhassan A. Karakara & Evans S. Osabuohien & Simplice A. Asongu, 2021. "Domestic Energy Consumption in Ghana: Deprivation versus Likelihood of Access," Journal of Africa SEER Centre(ASC) 21/009, Africa SEER Centre(ASC).
  • Handle: RePEc:dbm:wpaper:21/009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://africaseercentre.org/publications/RePEc/dbm/dbm-wpaper/Domestic-Energy-Consumption-in-Ghana-Deprivation-versus-Likelihood-of-Access.pdf
    File Function: Revised version, 2021
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • O13 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Environment; Other Primary Products
    • P28 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist and Transition Economies - - - Natural Resources; Environment
    • Q42 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Alternative Energy Sources

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbm:wpaper:21/009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bertrand Tchiemedjo Nankam (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://africaseercentre.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.