IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Non-Discretionary and Automatic Fiscal Policy in the EU and the OECD

Listed author(s):
  • Jacques Melitz


Official adjustments of the budget balance to the cycle merely assume that the only category of governmentspending that responds automatically to the cycle is unemployment compensation. But estimatesshow otherwise. Payments for pensions, health, subsistence, invalidity, childcare and subsidiesof all sorts to firms respond automatically and significantly to the cycle as well. In addition, it is fairlycommon to borrow official figures for cyclically adjusted budget balances, divide by potential output,and then use the resulting ratios to study discretionary fiscal policy. But if potential output is not deterministicbut subject to supply shocks, then apart from anything else, those ratios are inefficient estimatesof the cyclically-independent ratios of budget balances divided by potential output. (A fortiori,they are inefficient estimates of the cyclically adjusted ratios of budget balances to observed output.)Accordingly, the paper provides separate estimates of the impact of the cycle on the levels of budgetbalances and the ratios of budget balances to output. In addition, it discusses the relation between thetwo sorts of estimates. When the focus is on ratios of budget balances to output, the cyclical adjustmentsdepend more on inertia in government spending on goods and services than they do on taxes(which are largely proportional to output). But they depend even still more on transfer payments. Besidescalling for different series for discretionary fiscal policy if ratios serve, these results also raisequestions about the general policy advice to "let the automatic stabilizers work."

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
File Function: Crest working paper version
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Center for Research in Economics and Statistics in its series Working Papers with number 2005-10.

in new window

Length: 30
Date of creation: 2005
Handle: RePEc:crs:wpaper:2005-10
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Bâtiment ENSAE, 5 rue Henry LE Chatelier, 91120 Palaiseau

Phone: 01 41 17 60 81
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:crs:wpaper:2005-10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sri Srikandan)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.