IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Does a Specific Union Impact on Wage Increases? Evidence from Canada, 1985-2007

Listed author(s):
  • Edison Roy César
  • François Vaillancourt
Registered author(s):

    The purpose of this note is to examine the effect of belonging to a specific union on negotiated wage increases, given unionisation status. The data consist of all collective agreements with more than 500 employees, which were signed in Quebec (N=632) or Ontario (N=1349) during the 1985-2007 period. The model used is a standard wage equation with the negotiated rate of increase of base wages, annualized as the dependent variable and four dichotomous variables for a specific union, the CPI and the unemployment rate two quarters before the collective agreements, the presence or not of a cost of living agreements in the collective agreement and eighteen industrial dichotomous variables. We find with one exception no evidence that one union is better than another in obtaining higher wage growth. L'objectif de ce cahier est d'examiner l'impact d'une affiliation syndicale spécifique sur l'augmentation des salaires négociés, étant donné la syndicalisation. Les données sont l'ensemble des conventions collectives de 500 employés et plus qui ont été signées au Québec (N=632) et en Ontario (N=1349) durant la période 1985-2007. Le modèle utilisé est une équation salariale typique avec le taux d'augmentation salariale annualisé comme variable dépendante et quatre variables dichotomiques pour les syndicats spécifiques, l'IPC et le taux de chômage retardée de deux périodes par rapport à la signature, la présence ou non d'une clause d'ajustement au coût de la vie et 18 variables de secteur industriel. Nous ne trouvons sauf pour une exception aucun résultat indiquant qu'un syndicat obtient des augmentations plus élevées qu'un autre.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by CIRANO in its series CIRANO Working Papers with number 2010s-09.

    in new window

    Length: 10 pages
    Date of creation: 01 Feb 2010
    Handle: RePEc:cir:cirwor:2010s-09
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    1130 rue Sherbrooke Ouest, suite 1400, Montréal, Quéc, H3A 2M8

    Phone: (514) 985-4000
    Fax: (514) 985-4039
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    in new window

    1. John Schmitt, 2008. "The Union Wage Advantage for Low-Wage Workers," CEPR Reports and Issue Briefs 2008-17, Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR).
    2. Vaillancourt, Francois & Marceau, Nicolas, 1990. "Do general and firm-specific employer payroll taxes have the same incidence? : Theory and evidence," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 175-181, October.
    3. Budd, John W & Na, In-Gang, 2000. "The Union Membership Wage Premium for Employees Covered by Collective Bargaining Agreements," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 18(4), pages 783-807, October.
    4. William E. Even & David A. Macpherson, 2012. "Is Bigger Still Better? The Decline of the Wage Premium at Large Firms," Southern Economic Journal, Southern Economic Association, vol. 78(4), pages 1181-1201, April.
    5. Morley Gunderson & John Kervin & Frank Reid, 1989. "The Effect of Labour Relations Legislation on Strike Incidence," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 22(4), pages 779-794, November.
    6. Gunderson, Morley & Melino, Angelo, 1990. "The Effects of Public Policy on Strike Duration," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 8(3), pages 295-316, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cir:cirwor:2010s-09. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Webmaster)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.