IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ces/ceswps/_12838.html

Peatland Rewetting for Climate Change Mitigation

Author

Listed:
  • Dewy Verhoeven
  • Deniz Kilic
  • Suphi Sen
  • Hans-Peter Weikard

Abstract

Draining peatlands to allow agricultural production causes subsidence through peat oxidation, which is a major source of greenhouse gas emissions. Addressing this tradeoff, we develop an optimal control model of peat subsidence accounting for emissions, water management costs, and agricultural productivity. We apply this model to the Dutch peat meadows by constructing a new dataset at the parcel level using a geospatial model of land subsidence. We find that immediate rewetting or strong drainage reduction is socially optimal for most of the parcels. The optimal policy reduces subsidence and emissions by about 55 percent, saving about 1 Mt of CO2 annually. Relative to maintaining current drainage practices, accounting for climate costs increases net social benefits by 4 to 12.3 billion Euros depending on the carbon price.

Suggested Citation

  • Dewy Verhoeven & Deniz Kilic & Suphi Sen & Hans-Peter Weikard, 2026. "Peatland Rewetting for Climate Change Mitigation," CESifo Working Paper Series 12838, CESifo.
  • Handle: RePEc:ces:ceswps:_12838
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/cesifo1_wp12838.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anke Günther & Alexandra Barthelmes & Vytas Huth & Hans Joosten & Gerald Jurasinski & Franziska Koebsch & John Couwenberg, 2020. "Prompt rewetting of drained peatlands reduces climate warming despite methane emissions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-5, December.
    2. Stiglitz, Joseph E, 1976. "Monopoly and the Rate of Extraction of Exhaustible Resources," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 66(4), pages 655-661, September.
    3. Yuanyuan Huang & Phillipe Ciais & Yiqi Luo & Dan Zhu & Yingping Wang & Chunjing Qiu & Daniel S. Goll & Bertrand Guenet & David Makowski & Inge Graaf & Jens Leifeld & Min Jung Kwon & Jing Hu & Laiye Qu, 2021. "Tradeoff of CO2 and CH4 emissions from global peatlands under water-table drawdown," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 11(7), pages 618-622, July.
    4. Hoel, Michael, 1978. "Resource extraction, substitute production, and monopoly," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 28-37, October.
    5. Reinelt, Peter, 2020. "Spatial-dynamic seawater intrusion and pumping cost externalities in a confined aquifer," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    6. Kevin Rennert & Frank Errickson & Brian C. Prest & Lisa Rennels & Richard G. Newell & William Pizer & Cora Kingdon & Jordan Wingenroth & Roger Cooke & Bryan Parthum & David Smith & Kevin Cromar & Dela, 2022. "Comprehensive evidence implies a higher social cost of CO2," Nature, Nature, vol. 610(7933), pages 687-692, October.
    7. Juliane Hahn & Stefan Köhler & Stephan Glatzel & Gerald Jurasinski, 2015. "Methane Exchange in a Coastal Fen in the First Year after Flooding - A Systems Shift," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-25, October.
    8. J. Leifeld & L. Menichetti, 2018. "The underappreciated potential of peatlands in global climate change mitigation strategies," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-7, December.
    9. Domke, Niklas & Gocht, Alexander & Neuenfeldt, Sebastian & Tetteh, Gideon Okpoti & Yang, Xinxin & Grethe, Harald, 2026. "Opportunity costs of rewetting agriculturally used organic soils in Germany," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    10. Greta C. Dargie & Simon L. Lewis & Ian T. Lawson & Edward T. A. Mitchard & Susan E. Page & Yannick E. Bocko & Suspense A. Ifo, 2017. "Age, extent and carbon storage of the central Congo Basin peatland complex," Nature, Nature, vol. 542(7639), pages 86-90, February.
    11. Renan Goetz & David Zilberman, 1995. "Mining the soil: Agricultural production system on peatland," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 6(2), pages 119-138, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Suphi Sen & Dewy Verhoeven & Hans‐Peter Weikard, 2026. "Sinking peatlands: Optimal control of subsidence," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 108(3), pages 926-953, May.
    2. Andrey Sirin & Maria Medvedeva & Vladimir Korotkov & Victor Itkin & Tatiana Minayeva & Danil Ilyasov & Gennady Suvorov & Hans Joosten, 2021. "Addressing Peatland Rewetting in Russian Federation Climate Reporting," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, November.
    3. Malik Curuk & Suphi Sen, 2023. "Climate Policy and Resource Extraction with Variable Markups and Imperfect Substitutes," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 10(4), pages 1091-1120.
    4. Andrade de Sá, Saraly & Daubanes, Julien, 2016. "Limit pricing and the (in)effectiveness of the carbon tax," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 28-39.
    5. Jens Leifeld & Sonja M. Paul & Miriam Gross-Schmölders & Yuqiao Wang & Chloé Wüst-Galley, 2025. "Crediting peatland rewetting for carbon farming: some considerations amidst optimism," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 1-19, February.
    6. van der Ploeg, Frederick, 2020. "Race to burn the last ton of carbon and the risk of stranded assets," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    7. Adrien Bilal & James H. Stock, 2025. "A Guide to Macroeconomics and Climate Change," NBER Working Papers 33567, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Sommer, Pia & Lakner, Sebastian & Nordt, Anke & Tanneberger, Franziska & Wegmann, Johannes, 2024. "Deriving a justified budget for peatland rewetting – Applying the German coal phase-out as a blueprint," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    9. Temmink, Ralph J.M. & Lång, Kristiina & Vroom, Renske J.E. & Leifeld, Jens & Fritz, Christian & Zeug, Walther & Thrän, Daniela & Kleinspehn, Clemens & Gaudig, Greta & Neubert, Josephine & Kreyling, Jü, 2026. "Agriculture on wet peatlands: the sustainability potential of paludiculture," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    10. Sweeney, James L., 1993. "Economic theory of depletable resources: An introduction," Handbook of Natural Resource and Energy Economics, in: A. V. Kneese† & J. L. Sweeney (ed.), Handbook of Natural Resource and Energy Economics, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 17, pages 759-854, Elsevier.
    11. Johannes Pfeiffer, 2017. "Fossil Resources and Climate Change – The Green Paradox and Resource Market Power Revisited in General Equilibrium," ifo Beiträge zur Wirtschaftsforschung, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 77, April.
    12. Benchekroun, Hassan & van der Meijden, Gerard & Withagen, Cees, 2019. "An oligopoly-fringe non-renewable resource game in the presence of a renewable substitute," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 1-20.
    13. Jun Koarashi & Masayuki Itoh & Mariko Atarashi-Andoh & Yoko Saito-Kokubu & Makoto Matsueda & Kitso Kusin & Adi Jaya & Salampak Dohong & Takashi Hirano, 2026. "Progressive release of long-stored carbon from tropical peatland disturbances," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 17(1), pages 1-9, December.
    14. Frederick van der Ploeg, 2018. "Breakthrough Renewables and the Green Paradox," FinanzArchiv: Public Finance Analysis, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 74(1), pages 52-70, March.
    15. Hassan Benchekroun & Gerard (G.C.) van der Meijden & Cees Withagen, 2017. "OPEC, Shale Oil, and Global Warming - On the importance of the order of extraction," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 17-104/VIII, Tinbergen Institute.
    16. Ngo Long, 2011. "Dynamic Games in the Economics of Natural Resources: A Survey," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 115-148, March.
    17. Marz, Waldemar & Pfeiffer, Johannes, 2020. "Petrodollar recycling, oil monopoly, and carbon taxes," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    18. Willenbockel, Dirk, 2024. "Peatland restoration in Germany: A dynamic general equilibrium analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    19. Sommer, Pia & Frank, Leonard, 2024. "Peatland rewetting as drainage exnovation – A transition governance perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    20. Katayama, Seiichi & Abe, Fumio, 1998. "Is the monopolist the friend of the conservationist? Two remarks on the Hotelling-Solow paradox," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 33(3-4), pages 493-505, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C61 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis
    • Q15 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Land Ownership and Tenure; Land Reform; Land Use; Irrigation; Agriculture and Environment
    • Q24 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Land
    • Q25 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Water
    • Q50 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - General
    • Q54 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Climate; Natural Disasters and their Management; Global Warming
    • Q57 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Ecological Economics

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ceswps:_12838. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cesifde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.