IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/masfgc/v30y2025i2d10.1007_s11027-025-10203-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Crediting peatland rewetting for carbon farming: some considerations amidst optimism

Author

Listed:
  • Jens Leifeld

    (Agroscope, Climate and Agriculture Group)

  • Sonja M. Paul

    (Agroscope, Climate and Agriculture Group)

  • Miriam Gross-Schmölders

    (Agroscope, Climate and Agriculture Group
    University of Basel)

  • Yuqiao Wang

    (Agroscope, Climate and Agriculture Group
    Henan Agricultural University)

  • Chloé Wüst-Galley

    (Agroscope, Climate and Agriculture Group)

Abstract

Peatland drainage is worldwide a major human-induced greenhouse (GHG) source and rewetting increasingly considered a silver bullet to not only reverse the climate burden of peatland management, but also recover other ecosystem functions. Peatland rewetting is therefore one key measure in the evolving frameworks for carbon farming projects and an important nature based solution. However, with regards to the time horizon of rewetting projects and possible project failure the climate effect of rewetting has not yet been systematically analysed. Here we simulate the radiative forcing of peatland rewetting, based on impulse response functions, by using exemplary calculations addressing different time horizons, GHG fluxes and duration of project success. Water table drawdown during or after a rewetting project displaces GHG emissions into the future, meaning that rewetting projects that at some stage fail provide no climate benefit in the long run. This has important repercussions for the creditability of peatland projects and underpins that the value of peatland rewetting as a mitigation instrument strongly depends on successful and permanent implementation of a high water table. Furthermore, we show that linking radiative forcing with project duration and GHG emission patterns allows rational calculation of biophysical discounting and propose how such discounting can be used to account for the risk of project failure in payments to carbon farming schemes.

Suggested Citation

  • Jens Leifeld & Sonja M. Paul & Miriam Gross-Schmölders & Yuqiao Wang & Chloé Wüst-Galley, 2025. "Crediting peatland rewetting for carbon farming: some considerations amidst optimism," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 1-19, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:masfgc:v:30:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11027-025-10203-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s11027-025-10203-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11027-025-10203-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11027-025-10203-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philip Fearnside & Daniel Lashof & Pedro Moura-Costa, 2000. "Accounting for time in Mitigating Global Warming through land-use change and forestry," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 239-270, September.
    2. Raphael Portmann & Urs Beyerle & Edouard Davin & Erich M. Fischer & Steven Hertog & Sebastian Schemm, 2022. "Global forestation and deforestation affect remote climate via adjusted atmosphere and ocean circulation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Clarice R. Perryman & Jennifer C. Bowen & Julie Shahan & Desi Silviani P.A.B & Erin Dayanti & Yulita Andriyani & Adibtya Asyhari & Adi Gangga & Nisa Novita & Gusti Z. Anshari & Alison M. Hoyt, 2024. "Fate of methane in canals draining tropical peatlands," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-10, December.
    4. Anke Günther & Alexandra Barthelmes & Vytas Huth & Hans Joosten & Gerald Jurasinski & Franziska Koebsch & John Couwenberg, 2020. "Prompt rewetting of drained peatlands reduces climate warming despite methane emissions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-5, December.
    5. Bonn, Aletta & Reed, Mark S. & Evans, Chris D. & Joosten, Hans & Bain, Clifton & Farmer, Jenny & Emmer, Igino & Couwenberg, John & Moxey, Andrew & Artz, Rebekka & Tanneberger, Franziska & von Unger, M, 2014. "Investing in nature: Developing ecosystem service markets for peatland restoration," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 9(C), pages 54-65.
    6. J. Leifeld & L. Menichetti, 2018. "The underappreciated potential of peatlands in global climate change mitigation strategies," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-7, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrey Sirin & Maria Medvedeva & Vladimir Korotkov & Victor Itkin & Tatiana Minayeva & Danil Ilyasov & Gennady Suvorov & Hans Joosten, 2021. "Addressing Peatland Rewetting in Russian Federation Climate Reporting," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Sommer, Pia & Lakner, Sebastian & Nordt, Anke & Tanneberger, Franziska & Wegmann, Johannes, 2024. "Deriving a justified budget for peatland rewetting – Applying the German coal phase-out as a blueprint," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    3. Willenbockel, Dirk, 2024. "Peatland restoration in Germany: A dynamic general equilibrium analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    4. Sommer, Pia & Frank, Leonard, 2024. "Peatland rewetting as drainage exnovation – A transition governance perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    5. H. Damon Matthews & Kirsten Zickfeld & Alexander Koch & Amy Luers, 2023. "Accounting for the climate benefit of temporary carbon storage in nature," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    6. Oscar J. Cacho & Robyn L. Hean & Russell M. Wise, 2003. "Carbon‐accounting methods and reforestation incentives," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 47(2), pages 153-179, June.
    7. Kate Dooley & Ellycia Harrould‐Kolieb & Anita Talberg, 2021. "Carbon‐dioxide Removal and Biodiversity: A Threat Identification Framework," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(S1), pages 34-44, April.
    8. Matzek, Virginia & Wilson, Kerrie A. & Kragt, Marit, 2019. "Mainstreaming of ecosystem services as a rationale for ecological restoration in Australia," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 79-86.
    9. Sari, Dwi Amalia & Margules, Chris & Lim, Han She & Widyatmaka, Febrio & Sayer, Jeffrey & Dale, Allan & Macgregor, Colin, 2021. "Evaluating policy coherence: A case study of peatland forests on the Kampar Peninsula landscape, Indonesia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    10. Fearnside, Philip M., 2001. "Saving tropical forests as a global warming countermeasure: an issue that divides the environmental movement," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 167-184, November.
    11. Johanna Norris & Bettina Matzdorf & Rena Barghusen & Christoph Schulze & Bart van Gorcum, 2021. "Viewpoints on Cooperative Peatland Management: Expectations and Motives of Dutch Farmers," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, December.
    12. Miko Kirschbaum, 2006. "Temporary Carbon Sequestration Cannot Prevent Climate Change," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 11(5), pages 1151-1164, September.
    13. Nahuel Bautista & Bruno D. V. Marino & J. William Munger, 2021. "Science to Commerce: A Commercial-Scale Protocol for Carbon Trading Applied to a 28-Year Record of Forest Carbon Monitoring at the Harvard Forest," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-22, February.
    14. Olivia Cintas & Göran Berndes & Annette L. Cowie & Gustaf Egnell & Hampus Holmström & Göran I. Ågren, 2016. "The climate effect of increased forest bioenergy use in Sweden: evaluation at different spatial and temporal scales," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(3), pages 351-369, May.
    15. Michael Manton & Evaldas Makrickas & Piotr Banaszuk & Aleksander Kołos & Andrzej Kamocki & Mateusz Grygoruk & Marta Stachowicz & Leonas Jarašius & Nerijus Zableckis & Jūratė Sendžikaitė & Jan Peters &, 2021. "Assessment and Spatial Planning for Peatland Conservation and Restoration: Europe’s Trans-Border Neman River Basin as a Case Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-27, February.
    16. Suzi Kerr, 2003. "Indigenous Forests and Forest Sink Policy in New Zealand," Working Papers 03_15, Motu Economic and Public Policy Research.
    17. Klaus Keller & Zili Yang & Matt Hall & David F. Bradford, 2003. "Carbon Dioxide Sequestrian: When And How Much?," Working Papers 108, Princeton University, Department of Economics, Center for Economic Policy Studies..
    18. Parisa, Zack & Marland, Eric & Sohngen, Brent & Marland, Gregg & Jenkins, Jennifer, 2022. "The time value of carbon storage," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    19. Günther, Anke & Böther, Stefanie & Couwenberg, John & Hüttel, Silke & Jurasinski, Gerald, 2018. "Profitability of Direct Greenhouse Gas Measurements in Carbon Credit Schemes of Peatland Rewetting," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 766-771.
    20. Lenzen, Manfred & Dey, Christopher J. & Murray, Shauna A., 2004. "Historical accountability and cumulative impacts: the treatment of time in corporate sustainability reporting," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(3-4), pages 237-250, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:masfgc:v:30:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11027-025-10203-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.