IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cep/cepdps/dp2202.html

Employer market power: models and methods

Author

Listed:
  • Ihsaan Bassier
  • Alan Manning

Abstract

It is now widely recognized that employers hold some wage-setting power over workers, and several recent reviews cover the resulting surge of research on monopsony. We take a high-level view, introducing the idea of the employment probability function (EPF) which describes how workers are assigned to firms as a way to link disparate parts of the current literature. The paper discusses different approaches to specifying the EPF and how they lead to different approaches for estimating employer power. The paper has some new results - the adding-up condition for pass-through parameters, how failures of log-concavity can lead to segmentation and how models of idiosyncratic preferences and frictions can be combined in a single framework. It also points out gaps in the existing literature e.g. on the sign of the super-elasticity, the role of employer choice, and truly dynamic models.

Suggested Citation

  • Ihsaan Bassier & Alan Manning, 2026. "Employer market power: models and methods," CEP Discussion Papers dp2202, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
  • Handle: RePEc:cep:cepdps:dp2202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/dp2202.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cep:cepdps:dp2202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cep.lse.ac.uk/_new/publications/discussion-papers/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.