IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cde/cdewps/344.html

Do Deep Trade Agreements with Intellectual Property Provisions Actually Increase International Trade?

Author

Listed:
  • Ridwan Ah Sheikh

    (Department of Economics, Delhi School of Economics)

  • Sunil Kanwar

    (Department of Economics, Delhi School of Economics)

Abstract

This paper utilizes a comprehensive dataset on deep trade agreements between 1988-2017 in a panel of 210 countries to examine the impact of preferential trade agreements (PTAs) on trade while specifically focusing on the provisions related to intellectual property. The present paper employs a standard structural gravity model using Poisson Pseudo-Maximum Likelihood (PPML) estimation that simultaneously accounts for heteroskedasticity and preponderance of zeros in trade flows. We include rich set of fixed effects to account for multilateral resistance factors and endogeneity in binary trade agreements indicators. Moreover, we incorporate treatment leads and lags to estimate the anticipatory and phased-in impacts of our key trade policy instruments. The results indicate that both PTAs and IPR-related provisions (IPAs) contribute significantly in enhancing trade among member countries. Within the broad category of IPAs, those related to accession/ratification, national treatment, trademark, patents, industrial design, and enforcement aspects reveal a significant positive impact on trade. Additionally, the results demonstrate that IPAs positively influence bilateral trade flows in both high-IP-intensive and low-IP-intensive products, with a stronger impact observed in the high-IP-intensive group. Similarly, among the high-IP intensive group, provisions related to patents have a stronger positive impact on concurrent trade flow in patent-intensive industries, with these effects persisting up to two years after agreements’ inception. The provisions related to trademark and copyrights resulted in a significant reduction in trade flows within trademark-intensive and copyright-intensive industries, respectively, with any positive impact observed only after a lag. These results highlight the potential impact of deep trade agreements with intellectual property provisions, both at the extensive margin (i.e., number of IP-related provisions) as well as the intensive margin (i.e., specific provisions such as those related to copyrights, patents, enforcement, etc.) across different industries with varying degree of IPR-intensity, an aspect that has been inadequately explored in previous studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Ridwan Ah Sheikh & Sunil Kanwar, 2024. "Do Deep Trade Agreements with Intellectual Property Provisions Actually Increase International Trade?," Working papers 344, Centre for Development Economics, Delhi School of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:cde:cdewps:344
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cdedse.org/pdf/work344.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mario Larch & Yoto V Yotov, 2025. "Deep Trade Agreements and FDI in Partial and General Equilibrium: A Structural Estimation Framework," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 39(2), pages 281-307.
    2. Peter H. Egger & Mario Larch & Yoto V. Yotov, 2022. "Gravity Estimations with Interval Data: Revisiting the Impact of Free Trade Agreements," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 89(353), pages 44-61, January.
    3. Baldwin, Richard & Taglioni, Daria, 2006. "Gravity for Dummies and Dummies for Gravity Equations," CEPR Discussion Papers 5850, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    4. Anderson, James E. & Yotov, Yoto V., 2016. "Terms of trade and global efficiency effects of free trade agreements, 1990–2002," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 279-298.
    5. Dhingra, Swati & Freeman, Rebecca & Mavroeidi, Eleonora, 2018. "Beyond tariff reductions: what extra boost from trade agreement provisions?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 88683, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. James E. Anderson & Eric van Wincoop, 2003. "Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(1), pages 170-192, March.
    7. Mercedes Delgado & Margaret Kyle & Anita M. McGahan, 2013. "Intellectual Property Protection and the Geography of Trade," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(3), pages 733-762, September.
    8. McLaren, John, 1997. "Size, Sunk Costs, and Judge Bowker's Objection to Free Trade," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 87(3), pages 400-420, June.
    9. Silviano Esteve-Pérez & Salvador Gil-Pareja & Rafael Llorca-Vivero, 2020. "Does the GATT/WTO promote trade? After all, Rose was right," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 156(2), pages 377-405, May.
    10. I-Hui Cheng & Howard J. Wall, 2005. "Controlling for heterogeneity in gravity models of trade and integration," Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, vol. 87(Jan), pages 49-63.
    11. Baier, Scott L. & Yotov, Yoto V. & Zylkin, Thomas, 2019. "On the widely differing effects of free trade agreements: Lessons from twenty years of trade integration," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 206-226.
    12. María Pía Olivero & Yoto V. Yotov, 2012. "Dynamic gravity: endogenous country size and asset accumulation," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(1), pages 64-92, February.
    13. Baier, Scott L. & Bergstrand, Jeffrey H. & Feng, Michael, 2014. "Economic integration agreements and the margins of international trade," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(2), pages 339-350.
    14. Baier, Scott L. & Bergstrand, Jeffrey H. & Clance, Matthew W., 2018. "Heterogeneous effects of economic integration agreements," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 587-608.
    15. Maddalena Conte & Pierre Cotterlaz & Thierry Mayer, 2022. "The CEPII Gravity Database," Working Papers 2022-05, CEPII research center.
    16. repec:wbk:wbpubs:34055 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Andrew K. Rose, 2004. "Do We Really Know That the WTO Increases Trade?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 94(1), pages 98-114, March.
    18. Baier, Scott L. & Bergstrand, Jeffrey H., 2007. "Do free trade agreements actually increase members' international trade?," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(1), pages 72-95, March.
    19. Jeffrey M Wooldridge, 2010. "Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 2, volume 1, number 0262232588, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kartiki Verma & Sunil Kanwar, 2026. "Measuring the Implementation of Intellectual Property Rights in India," Working papers 359, Centre for Development Economics, Delhi School of Economics.
    2. Ruizhe Gao & Wei He & Ehsan Elahi, 2025. "Do Intellectual Property Rights Protection in RTAs Contribute to the Stability of Services Trade?," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, September.
    3. Ridwan Ah Sheikh & Sunil Kanwar, 2025. "Revisiting the impact of TRIPS on trade: Evidence from staggered difference-in-differences," Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai Working Papers 2025-025, Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai, India.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yoto V. Yotov, 2024. "The evolution of structural gravity: The workhorse model of trade," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 42(4), pages 578-603, October.
    2. Díaz-Mora, Carmen & Esteve-Pérez, Silviano & Gil-Pareja, Salvador, 2023. "A re-assessment of the heterogeneous effect of trade agreements using intra-national trade flows," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 940-951.
    3. Mario Larch & Yoto V. Yotov, 2024. "Estimating the effects of trade agreements: Lessons from 60 years of methods and data," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(5), pages 1771-1799, May.
    4. Adu, Raymond & Litsios, Ioannis & Baimbridge, Mark, 2022. "ECOWAS single currency: Prospective effects on trade," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    5. Duc Bao Nguyen & Anne‐Gaël Vaubourg, 2021. "Financial intermediation, trade agreements and international trade," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(3), pages 788-817, March.
    6. Scott L. Baier & Amanda Kerr & Yoto V. Yotov, 2018. "Gravity, distance, and international trade," Chapters, in: Bruce A. Blonigen & Wesley W. Wilson (ed.), Handbook of International Trade and Transportation, chapter 2, pages 15-78, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. Erick Kitenge & Sajal Lahiri, 2024. "Estimating gravity coefficients with multiple layers of heterogeneity," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(3), pages 1204-1237, August.
    8. Silviano Esteve-Pérez & Salvador Gil-Pareja & Rafael Llorca-Vivero, 2020. "Does the GATT/WTO promote trade? After all, Rose was right," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 156(2), pages 377-405, May.
    9. Harald Oberhofer & Zhenyi Wang, 2025. "Everything You Always Wanted to Know About EU Membership Trade Effects But Were Afraid to Ask," CESifo Working Paper Series 11823, CESifo.
    10. Gabriel Felbermayr & Constantinos Syropoulos & Erdal Yalcin & Yoto V. Yotov, 2025. "On the heterogeneous effects of sanctions on trade," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 58(1), pages 247-280, February.
    11. Dongin Kim & Sandro Steinbach & Carlos Zurita, 2025. "Virtual Water Trade and Economic Integration: The Role of Trade Agreements in Global Water Redistribution," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 47(5), pages 1998-2018, December.
    12. Silviano Esteve‐Pérez & Salvador Gil‐Pareja & Rafael Llorca‐Vivero & Jordi Paniagua, 2026. "Has the Euro Paid Off? A Study of the Trade‐Induced Welfare Effects of the EMU," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 58(3), pages 705-737, April.
    13. Dutt, Pushan, 2020. "The WTO is not passé," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    14. Erick Kitenge & Sajal Lahiri, 2022. "Is the Internet bringing down language‐based barriers to international trade?," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 566-605, May.
    15. Abdulkareem Alhassan & Cem Payaslioğlu, 2024. "Trade Diversion and Creation Effect of Free Trade Agreements in ASEAN: Do Institutions Matter?," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 917-935, March.
    16. Lampe, Markus & O’Rourke, Kevin Hjortshøj & Reiter, Lorenz & Yotov, Yoto V., 2025. "The Empire project: Trade policy in interwar Canada," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    17. Mario Larch & Serge Shikher & Constantinos Syropoulos & Yoto V. Yotov, 2022. "Quantifying the impact of economic sanctions on international trade in the energy and mining sectors," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 60(3), pages 1038-1063, July.
    18. Lourenço S. Paz & Magnus Reis & André Filipe Zago Azevedo, 2024. "New Evidence on WTO Membership After the Uruguay Round: An Analysis at the Sectoral Level," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 1-39, February.
    19. Arne J. Nagengast & Fernando Rios‐Avila & Yoto V. Yotov, 2026. "The European single market and intra‐EU trade: an assessment with heterogeneity‐robust difference‐in‐differences methods," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 93(369), pages 298-331, January.
    20. Kwon, Ohyun & Syropoulos, Constantinos & Yotov, Yoto V., 2024. "Identifying and quantifying the extraterritorial effects of sanctions," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cde:cdewps:344. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sanjeev Sharma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cdudein.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.