IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bri/uobdis/26-845.html

Measuring Occupational Health Inequality in the US, 2008-Present

Author

Listed:
  • Gregory Jolivet
  • Fabien Postel-Vinay

Abstract

We combine data from O*NET and the CPS to analyze changes in the distribution of job health contents in the United States over the past 18 years. We find that the labor market has been moving toward more stressful and psychologically demanding jobs but also toward jobs with more decision latitude. These changes occurred mostly within occupations, rather than resulting from worker reallocation across occupations. Using the structure of a generic job search model, we estimate workers' Marginal Willingness to Pay (MWP) for various job health attributes over time. We uncover significantly negative preferences for psychological demands from the mid-2010s onwards. At the same time, we find that workers increasingly value decision latitude over time. We use our structural estimates to document the role of occupational health in the dynamics of welfare inequalities across workers as well as between men and women.

Suggested Citation

  • Gregory Jolivet & Fabien Postel-Vinay, 2026. "Measuring Occupational Health Inequality in the US, 2008-Present," Bristol Economics Discussion Papers 26/845, School of Economics, University of Bristol, UK.
    • Handle: RePEc:bri:uobdis:26/845
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/efm/media/workingpapers/working_papers/pdffiles/dp26845.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Timothy J. Gronberg & W. Robert Reed, 1994. "Estimating Workers' Marginal Willingness to Pay for Job Attributes Using Duration Data," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 29(3), pages 911-931.
    2. Henrik Schwabe & Fulvio Castellacci, 2020. "Automation, workers’ skills and job satisfaction," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-26, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giovanni Russo & Jos Ommeren & Piet Rietveld, 2012. "The university workers’ willingness to pay for commuting," Transportation, Springer, vol. 39(6), pages 1121-1132, November.
    2. Jos Van Ommeren, 2003. "The Unemployed Individual's Marginal Willingness to Pay for the Remaining Entitlement Period," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 17(2), pages 271-283, June.
    3. Kelly, Elaine & Stockton, Isabel, 2026. "A senior doctor like me: Gender match and occupational choice," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    4. Gregory Verdugo & Malak Kandoussi, 2025. "Will you follow your job to the suburbs? Commuting, locational amenities and wages in a large metro area," Sciences Po Economics Publications (main) hal-05447239, HAL.
    5. Minhaj Mahmud & Italo A Gutierrez & Krishna B Kumar & Shanthi Nataraj, 2021. "What Aspects of Formality Do Workers Value? Evidence from a Choice Experiment in Bangladesh," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 35(2), pages 303-327.
    6. Hwang, Hae-shin & Mortensen, Dale T & Reed, W Robert, 1998. "Hedonic Wages and Labor Market Search," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 16(4), pages 815-847, October.
    7. Elaine Kelly & Isabel Stockton, 2024. "A senior doctor like me: Gender match and occupational choice," IFS Working Papers W24/11, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    8. Duco Vos & Evert Meijers & Maarten Ham, 2018. "Working from home and the willingness to accept a longer commute," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 61(2), pages 375-398, September.
    9. He, Chao & Zhou, Zhongsheng & Jian, Fangfang & Qiu, Yuhan, 2025. "Robots and cost of equity: Evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 94(PB).
    10. Tim Hinks, 2024. "Artificial Intelligence Perceptions and Life Satisfaction," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 1-14, February.
    11. Elsy Verhofstadt & Hans De Witte & Eddy Omey, 2009. "Demand, Control and its Relationship with Job Mobility among Young Workers," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 30(2), pages 266-293, May.
    12. Borghorst, Malte & Mulalic, Ismir & van Ommeren, Jos, 2024. "Commuting, gender and children," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    13. Fulvio Castellacci & Emil Evenhuis & Koen Frenken, 2025. "Geographies of innovation and well-being," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 45(3), pages 377-394, September.
    14. StÈphane Bonhomme & GrÈgory Jolivet, 2009. "The pervasive absence of compensating differentials," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(5), pages 763-795.
    15. Scott, Anthony, 2001. "Eliciting GPs' preferences for pecuniary and non-pecuniary job characteristics," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 329-347, May.
    16. Jason Sockin, 2022. "Show Me the Amenity: Are Higher-Paying Firms Better All Around?," CESifo Working Paper Series 9842, CESifo.
    17. Dey, Matthew & Flinn, Christopher, 2008. "Household search and health insurance coverage," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 145(1-2), pages 43-63, July.
    18. Haywood, Luke, 2016. "Wealth effects on job preferences," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 38, pages 1-11.
    19. Yuhong Du & Hazrul Shahiri & Xiahai Wei, 2025. "The penetration of robotic technology, task content routinisation and job satisfaction: Evidence from China," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 50(3), pages 876-894, August.
    20. Petri Böckerman & Pekka Ilmakunnas, 2004. "Job Disamenities, Job Satisfaction and on-the-Job Search: Is There a Nexus?," Working Papers 208, Työn ja talouden tutkimus LABORE, Labour Institute for Economic Research LABORE.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bri:uobdis:26/845. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: School of Economics Research Support Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sebriuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.