IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/boe/boeewp/023311.html

Travel restrictions as border frictions: evidence from the Covid-19 pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • John Lewis

    (Bank of England)

Abstract

Using a gravity framework with internal trade flows, I find that travel restrictions translated into large and economically meaningful increases in the cost of trading goods across borders. Travel restrictions operated like a classic border friction, with a full closure reducing bilateral trade by around 19% for a typical country pair and implying a hit to global trade of approximately 23% in 2020 Q2. The effects are highly heterogeneous with respect to distance and transport mode: geographically proximate trading partners experienced larger trade losses and trade flows by road and air were significantly disrupted, while seaborne and rail trade were not. The interaction between distance and transport exposure generates substantial cross-country variation in the overall trade impact of border closures, and explains why some countries were able to close their borders at a (much) lower cost to trade flows than others. There is no evidence of long run scarring effects from restrictions, rather trade rebounded strongly with a temporary ‘overshooting’ once restrictions were eased.

Suggested Citation

  • John Lewis, 2026. "Travel restrictions as border frictions: evidence from the Covid-19 pandemic," Bank of England Staff Working Paper series 1189, Bank of England.
  • Handle: RePEc:boe:boeewp:023311
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/-/media/boe/files/working-paper/2026/travel-restrictions-as-border-frictions-evidence-from-the-covid-19-pandemic.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • F1 - International Economics - - Trade
    • F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Empirical Studies of Trade
    • F18 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade and Environment

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boe:boeewp:023311. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Research (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/boegvuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.