Propensity score matching
The typical evaluation problem aims at quantifying the impact of a ÔtreatmentÕ (e.g. a training programme, a reform, or a medicine) on an outcome of interest (such as earnings, school attendance or illness indicators), where a group of units, the ÔtreatedÕ, receive the ÔtreatmentÕ, while a second group remains untreated. Statistical matching involves pairing to each treated unit a non-treated unit with the ÔsameÕ observable characteristics, so that (under some assumptions) the outcome experienced by the matched pool of non-treated may be taken as the outcome the treated units would have experienced had they not been treated. Alternatively, one can associate to each treated unit a matched outcome given by the average of the outcome of all the untreated units, where each of their contributions can be weighted according to their 'distance' to the treated unit under consideration. An interesting quantity which avoids the dimensionality problem is the Ôpropensity scoreÕ, the conditional probability of being treated. psmatch implements various types of propensity score matching estimators: from one-to-one matching with replacement (optionally within a caliper) to a number of smoothed versions (including nearest neighbours, kernel, local linear regression). Additionally, it allows to implement Mahalanobis metric matching on two or three variables. Other options include estimation of the propensity score, bootstrapping of the treatment effect, the creation of matching quality indicators for a set of specified variables and producing a smoothed outcome for the treated as well. The software (version 2.0) was revised in August 2001. The current version is psmatch2 of Leuven and Sianesi.
|Date of creation:||25 Apr 2001|
|Date of revision:||23 Aug 2001|
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.stata.com/meeting/7uk|
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- James J. Heckman & Hidehiko Ichimura & Petra E. Todd, 1997. "Matching As An Econometric Evaluation Estimator: Evidence from Evaluating a Job Training Programme," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 64(4), pages 605-654.
- James J. Heckman & Hidehiko Ichimura & Petra Todd, 1998. "Matching As An Econometric Evaluation Estimator," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 65(2), pages 261-294.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boc:usug01:12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F Baum)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.