IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bis/bisbcw/33.html

Survey on the interaction of regulatory instruments: results and analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Bank for International Settlements

Abstract

This report aims to summarise and analyse the results of the second-wave of the survey conducted by the Basel Committee's Research Task Force on the role of multiple regulatory constraints in the Basel III framework. The results of the first wave (reporting date 30 June 2016) were published in February 2017 and invited additional survey questions as well as more in-depth interpretations of banks' answers. Some aggregate results are broken down by bank groups and geography. To provide additional insights (and check data quality), banks' answers from this survey are merged to banks' information on the other topics collected through the Basel III monitoring exercise. We find that there is a great degree of consistency across topics and, also, between the two survey waves.

Suggested Citation

  • Bank for International Settlements, 2018. "Survey on the interaction of regulatory instruments: results and analysis," BCBS Working Papers 33, Bank for International Settlements.
    • Handle: RePEc:bis:bisbcw:33
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/wp33.pdf
    File Function: Full PDF document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/wp33.htm
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Goel, Tirupam & Lewrick, Ulf & Tarashev, Nikola, 2020. "Bank capital allocation under multiple constraints," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    2. Schuermann, Til, 2014. "Stress testing banks," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 717-728.
    3. Rafael Repullo & Javier Suarez, 2013. "The Procyclical Effects of Bank Capital Regulation," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 26(2), pages 452-490.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yu-Hsiu Lin & Len-Kuo Hu, 2015. "The cyclicality of bank regulation in a general economic framework," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(53), pages 5791-5804, November.
    2. Farkas, Walter & Fringuellotti, Fulvia & Tunaru, Radu, 2020. "A cost-benefit analysis of capital requirements adjusted for model risk," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    3. Marcel Brautigam & Michel Dacorogna & Marie Kratz, 2019. "Pro-Cyclicality of Traditional Risk Measurements: Quantifying and Highlighting Factors at its Source," Papers 1903.03969, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2019.
    4. Foley, Sean & Kwan, Amy & Philip, Richard & Ødegaard, Bernt Arne, 2022. "Contagious margin calls: How COVID-19 threatened global stock market liquidity," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 59(PA).
    5. Benchimol, Jonathan & Gamrasni, Inon & Kahn, Michael & Ribon, Sigal & Saadon, Yossi & Ben-Ze’ev, Noam & Segal, Asaf & Shizgal, Yitzchak, 2022. "The interaction between domestic monetary policy and macroprudential policy in Israel," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    6. Bank for International Settlements, 2015. "The interplay of accounting and regulation and its impact on bank behaviour: Literature review," BCBS Working Papers 28, Bank for International Settlements.
    7. Faisal Abbas & Imran Yousaf & Shoaib Ali & Wing-Keung Wong, 2021. "Bank Capital Buffer and Economic Growth: New Insights from the US Banking Sector," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-13, March.
    8. Shu Ling Chiang & Ming Shann Tsai, 2019. "The Valuation of Deposit Insurance Premiums Based on a Specific Bank's Official Default Probability," Multinational Finance Journal, Multinational Finance Journal, vol. 23(3-4), pages 141-167, September.
    9. Harry Huizinga & Luc Laeven, 2019. "The Procyclicality of Banking: Evidence from the Euro Area," IMF Economic Review, Palgrave Macmillan;International Monetary Fund, vol. 67(3), pages 496-527, September.
    10. Gehrig, Thomas & Iannino, Maria Chiara, 2021. "Did the Basel Process of capital regulation enhance the resiliency of European banks?," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    11. Asako Chiba, 2022. "Bank capital and liquidity regulation," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(2), pages 120-138, June.
    12. Markus Behn & Rainer Haselmann & Paul Wachtel, 2016. "Procyclical Capital Regulation and Lending," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 71(2), pages 919-956, April.
    13. Carvallo Valencia, Oscar & Ortiz Bolaños, Alberto, 2018. "Bank capital buffers around the world: Cyclical patterns and the effect of market power," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 119-131.
    14. Vítor Branco Oliveira & Diogo Serra & Lucas Avezum, 2023. "To use or not to use? Capital buffers and lending during a crisis," Working Papers w202308, Banco de Portugal, Economics and Research Department.
    15. Mendicino, Caterina & Nikolov, Kalin & Ramirez, Juan-Rubio & Suarez, Javier & Supera, Dominik, 2020. "Twin defaults and bank capital requirements," Working Paper Series 2414, European Central Bank.
    16. Florian Hoffmann & Roman Inderst & Marcus Opp, 2022. "The Economics of Deferral and Clawback Requirements," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 77(4), pages 2423-2470, August.
    17. Iñaki Aldasoro & Wenqian Huang & Nikola Tarashev, 2025. "Central Bank Liquidity Backstops, Bank Regulation, and Risk-Taking by Asset Managers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(11), pages 9588-9605, November.
    18. Bakkar, Yassine & De Jonghe, Olivier & Tarazi, Amine, 2023. "Does banks’ systemic importance affect their capital structure and balance sheet adjustment processes?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    19. Lamont K. Black & Ioannis Floros & Rajdeep Sengupta, 2016. "Raising capital when the going gets tough: U.S. bank equity issuance from 2001 to 2014," Research Working Paper RWP 16-5, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.
    20. Huang, Chao & Moreira, Fernando & Archibald, Thomas W., 2024. "Should Basel-style liquidity requirements be set countercyclically? Evidence from a numerical analysis," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(PB).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bis:bisbcw:33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Martin Fessler (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bisssch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.