IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2012_014.html

The related labour market implications for the construction environment

Author

Listed:
  • Peter James Glynn
  • Roslyn Taplin

Abstract

Climate change will have a considerable impact on the constructed environment. More specifically, policies and regulations made will impact on construction labour and have future implications for the delivery of climate adaptive property. This paper will examine the implications of climate change policy for the constructed environment labour market. It discusses whether policymakers and regulators are sufficiently informed and aware to accommodate the requirements of a low carbon workplace and whether the actors in the workplace can effectively implement the technical, regulatory and social reforms. The paper concludes that the current initiatives are individually suitable but government models are generally incomplete, lack cohesion and so do not deliver to the extent required by industry or the workplace actors. The labour market: Recent studies find that there are changes occurring in the labour market as a consequence of climate change (GHK Consulting 2007; ETUC, 2007; Worldwatch Institute, 2008). They also find that skills shortages are a binding constraint on the sector, and that it will continue to be difficult to source workers in the number and with the skills required. These changes are a reflection of the industry’s moves to adapt to the new conditions, and the scaling up required to undertake the work that will reduce the energy consumed and the volume of emissions for which the constructed environment is responsible. Employers’ organisations and trade unions play an active role in the provision of sector and labour market information to policy makers, advocating the collective interests of their constituents who otherwise do not have the opportunity for input on policy and regulatory matters. They also serve as the interface between business and labour interests, and policy makers and regulators. Employers’ organisations and trade unions responsibilities include labour relations and social dialogue in respect of climate change. The paper finds these objectives overlap in some areas and therefore create the potential to infringe regulatory jurisdictions. Diligence is necessary to ensure that labour and management can remain focussed on the delivery of goods and services, while also undertaking the measures necessary to adapt to the requirements of a low carbon economy. The constructed environment: is a major contributor to economic growth and employment, providing 10% of global gross domestic product and employing 5-10% of total employm

Suggested Citation

  • Peter James Glynn & Roslyn Taplin, 2012. "The related labour market implications for the construction environment," ERES eres2012_014, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
  • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2012_014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2012-014-1
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/system/files/pdf/eres2012_014.content.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stern,Nicholas, 2007. "The Economics of Climate Change," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521700801, January.
    2. repec:ilo:ilowps:464283 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Renat Perelet, Serguey Pegov and Mikhail Yulkin, 2007. "Climate Change. Russia Country Paper," Human Development Occasional Papers (1992-2007) HDOCPA-2007-12, Human Development Report Office (HDRO), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP).
    2. Ahmed Bilal Awan & Muhammad Zubair & Praveen R. P. & Ahmed G. Abokhalil, 2018. "Solar Energy Resource Analysis and Evaluation of Photovoltaic System Performance in Various Regions of Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-27, April.
    3. Stéphane Hallegatte, 2008. "A Proposal for a New Prescriptive Discounting Scheme: The Intergenerational Discount Rate," Working Papers 2008.47, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    4. van den Bergh, J.C.J.M. & Botzen, W.J.W., 2015. "Monetary valuation of the social cost of CO2 emissions: A critical survey," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 33-46.
    5. Strand, Jon, 2011. "Carbon offsets with endogenous environmental policy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 371-378, March.
    6. Pasquale Lucio Scandizzo, 2014. "The social rate of discount, climate change and real options," CEIS Research Paper 309, Tor Vergata University, CEIS, revised 18 Feb 2014.
    7. John Tomaney & Andy Pike & Andrés Rodríguez-Pose, 2010. "Local and Regional Development in Times of Crisis," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 42(4), pages 771-779, April.
    8. Simon Dietz & Frederick van der Ploeg & Armon Rezai & Frank Venmans, 2021. "Are Economists Getting Climate Dynamics Right and Does It Matter?," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 8(5), pages 895-921.
    9. Stern, Nicholas, 2018. "Public economics as if time matters: Climate change and the dynamics of policy," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 4-17.
    10. Lotze-Campen, Hermann & von Witzke, Harald & Noleppa, Steffen & Schwarz, Gerald, 2015. "Science for food, climate protection and welfare: An economic analysis of plant breeding research in Germany," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 79-84.
    11. Frederick Ploeg & Aart Zeeuw, 2019. "Pricing Carbon and Adjusting Capital to Fend Off Climate Catastrophes," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 72(1), pages 29-50, January.
    12. Valentina Bosetti & Jeffrey Frankel, 2014. "Sustainable Cooperation In Global Climate Policy: Specific Formulas And Emission Targets," Climate Change Economics (CCE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 5(03), pages 1-34.
    13. Janet J. McIntyre‐Mills, 2008. "Systemic ethics: expanding the boundaries of rights and responsibilities," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(2), pages 147-150, March.
    14. Pycroft, Jonathan & Vergano, Lucia & Hope, Chris & Paci, Daniele & Ciscar, Juan Carlos, 2011. "A tale of tails: Uncertainty and the social cost of carbon dioxide," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 5, pages 1-29.
    15. Christian Traeger, 2012. "Once Upon a Time Preference - How Rationality and Risk Aversion Change the Rationale for Discounting," CESifo Working Paper Series 3793, CESifo.
    16. Oliver Schenker, 2013. "Exchanging Goods and Damages: The Role of Trade on the Distribution of Climate Change Costs," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 54(2), pages 261-282, February.
    17. Richard Green & Yacob Mulugetta & Zhong Xiang Zhang, 2014. "Sustainable energy policy," Chapters, in: Giles Atkinson & Simon Dietz & Eric Neumayer & Matthew Agarwala (ed.), Handbook of Sustainable Development, chapter 33, pages 532-550, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    18. Luigi Aldieri & Jonas Grafström & Kristoffer Sundström & Concetto Paolo Vinci, 2019. "Wind Power and Job Creation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-23, December.
    19. Alejandro Lopez-Feldman, 2013. "Climate change, agriculture, and poverty: A household level analysis for rural Mexico," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 33(2), pages 1126-1139.
    20. Stephen Gardiner, 2014. "Why ‘global public good’ is a treacherous term, especially for geoengineering," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 123(2), pages 101-106, March.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2012_014. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.