IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2607.14414.html

Probability of worthwhile effect of monotone-response treatments

Author

Listed:
  • Benjamin C^ot'e
  • Ruodu Wang

Abstract

Experiments may, by design, prevent one from observing on a single subject both the response to a treatment and to its absence. Because of this, marginal distributions for both cases may be observable but not their joint distribution, thus obscuring the distribution of the treatment effect. We examine the case where we impose that the treatment effect is nonnegative, also called monotone treatment response, a common assumption relevant to many practical applications. We solve the problems of best- and worst-case probabilities that the treatment effect exceeds a given value, using an explicit construction for the dependence scheme in each case. Such problems can equivalently be described, in different contexts, as risk aggregation under dependence uncertainty and an order constraint, and as optimal transport with a particular cost function.

Suggested Citation

  • Benjamin C^ot'e & Ruodu Wang, 2026. "Probability of worthwhile effect of monotone-response treatments," Papers 2607.14414, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2607.14414
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.14414
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2607.14414. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.