IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2603.25696.html

Input-Output Price Parity and Farm Profitability: A Strategic Perspective for Karnataka

Author

Listed:
  • Vaishnavi
  • Lokesha
  • H.
  • Vedamurthy
  • K. B.
  • Manojkumar Patil

Abstract

Agricultural pricing policies are crucial for farm profitability and food security in India. This study analysed how input and output prices significantly influence the profitability of cereals in Karnataka, with the strategic support prices playing a crucial role in maintaining the price parity. The average annual TFP growth was 1.041 per cent. Rising input costs, particularly for human labour, led to reduced profitability for Jowar (6.12 per cent) and Ragi (4.89 per cent). The net effect was adverse for Jowar (-1.50 per cent) and Ragi (-0.86 per cent) due to rising input costs outpacing output prices. The study recommended increasing the MSP for Jowar (60 per cent) and Ragi (46.24 per cent) above the existing levels. A strategic price adjusted for changing input costs can stabilise farm incomes and promote sustainable production, enabling efficient pricing policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Vaishnavi & Lokesha & H. & Vedamurthy & K. B. & Manojkumar Patil, 2026. "Input-Output Price Parity and Farm Profitability: A Strategic Perspective for Karnataka," Papers 2603.25696, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2603.25696
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.25696
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Srivastava, S.K. & Chand, Ramesh & Singh, Jaspal, 2017. "Changing Crop Production Cost in India: Input Prices, Substitution and Technological Effects," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 30(Conferenc).
    2. Timothy J. Coelli & D.S. Prasada Rao & Christopher J. O’Donnell & George E. Battese, 2005. "An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis," Springer Books, Springer, edition 0, number 978-0-387-25895-9, December.
    3. Chintapalli, Prashant & Tang, Christopher S., 2022. "The implications of crop minimum support price in the presence of myopic and strategic farmers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(1), pages 336-349.
    4. Kumar, Praduman & Shinoj, P. & Raju, S.S. & Kumar, Anjani & Rich, Karl M. & Msangi, Siwa, 2010. "Factor Demand, Output Supply Elasticities and Supply Projections for Major Crops of India," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 23(01), January.
    5. Swarna Sadasivam, 1993. "Price and Non Price Factors in Input Use and Output Supply A Case of Gram in Uttar Pradesh," Indian Economic Review, Department of Economics, Delhi School of Economics, vol. 28(1), pages 73-83, January.
    6. Diewert, W. E., 1976. "Exact and superlative index numbers," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 4(2), pages 115-145, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. LU Yung-Hsiang & Ku-Hsieh CHEN & WU Chun-Cheng, 2015. "Cross-country analysis of efficiency and productivity in the biotech industry: an application of the generalized metafrontier Malmquist productivity index," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 61(3), pages 116-134.
    2. Surya Bhushan, 2021. "Labour Productivity Dynamics in Indian Agriculture: 2000–2016," The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Springer;The Indian Society of Labour Economics (ISLE), vol. 64(2), pages 371-388, June.
    3. Paul, Satya & Shankar, Sriram, 2022. "Regulatory reforms and the efficiency and productivity growth in electricity generation in OECD countries," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    4. Xie, Bai-Chen & Ni, Kang-Kang & O'Neill, Eoghan & Li, Hong-Zhou, 2021. "The scale effect in China's power grid sector from the perspective of malmquist total factor productivity analysis," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    5. Jaepil Han & Robin C. Sickles, 2024. "Correction to: Estimation of industry-level productivity with cross-sectional dependence by using spatial analysis," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 62(3), pages 395-395, December.
    6. Veneranda Vedastus Lufano & Dr. Gabriel Kirori & Dr. Rose Mugiira, 2023. "Efficiency Analysis of the Food and Beverage Industry in Tanzania: A Comparative Analysis," International Journal of Economics, IPRJB, vol. 8(2), pages 19-32.
    7. Santos, João & Domingos, Tiago & Sousa, Tânia & St. Aubyn, Miguel, 2016. "Does a small cost share reflect a negligible role for energy in economic production? Testing for aggregate production functions including capital, labor, and useful exergy through a cointegration-based method," MPRA Paper 70850, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Muhammad Ali Chaudhary & Eatzaz Ahmad & Abid A. Burki & Mushtaq A. Khan, 1999. "Industrial Sector Input Demand Responsiveness and Policy Interventions," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 38(4), pages 1083-1100.
    9. Lundgren, Tommy & Marklund, Per-Olov & Zhang, Shanshan, 2016. "Industrial energy demand and energy efficiency – Evidence from Sweden," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 130-152.
    10. Claude Hillinger, 2002. "A General Theory of Price and Quantity Aggregation and Welfare Measurement," CESifo Working Paper Series 818, CESifo.
    11. Helmi Hammami & Thanh Ngo & David Tripe & Dinh-Tri Vo, 2022. "Ranking with a Euclidean common set of weights in data envelopment analysis: with application to the Eurozone banking sector," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(2), pages 675-694, April.
    12. Jiaqiang Sun & Anita Binti Rosli & Adrian Daud, 2025. "Efficiency analysis of listed pharmaceutical companies in China: A method combining three-stage DEA with undesirable output, PCA, and tobit regression," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(8), pages 1-33, August.
    13. McGath, Christopher & McElroy, Robert G. & Strickland, Roger & Traub, Larry & Convey, Theodore & Short, Sara D. & Johnson, James & Green, Report & Ali, Mir B. & Vogel, Stephen, 2009. "Forecasting Farm Income: Documenting USDA's Forecast Model," Technical Bulletins 184311, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    14. W. Erwin Diewert & Robert C. Feenstra, 2021. "Estimating the Benefits of New Products," NBER Chapters, in: Big Data for Twenty-First-Century Economic Statistics, pages 437-473, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Thomas von Brasch & Håkon Grini & Magnus Berglund Johnsen & Trond Christian Vigtel, 2021. "An exact additive decomposition of the weighted arithmetic mean," Discussion Papers 944, Statistics Norway, Research Department.
    16. Redding, Stephen J. & Weinstein, David E., 2016. "A unified approach to estimating demand and welfare," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 67681, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    17. Kox, Henk L.M. & Leeuwen, George van & Wiel, Henry van der, 2010. "Competitive, but too small - productivity and entry-exit determinants in European business services," MPRA Paper 24389, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Yu Chen & Chen Zhen, 2022. "The potential impact of reducing sodium in packaged food: The case of the Chinese instant noodles market," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(1), pages 3-20, January.
    19. David Rezza Baqaee & Emmanuel Farhi, 2019. "The Macroeconomic Impact of Microeconomic Shocks: Beyond Hulten's Theorem," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 87(4), pages 1155-1203, July.
    20. Silvia Saravia-Matus & T. S. Amjath-Babu & Sreejith Aravindakshan & Stefan Sieber & Jimmy A. Saravia & Sergio Gomez y Paloma, 2021. "Can Enhancing Efficiency Promote the Economic Viability of Smallholder Farmers? A Case of Sierra Leone," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, April.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2603.25696. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.