IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0329767.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficiency analysis of listed pharmaceutical companies in China: A method combining three-stage DEA with undesirable output, PCA, and tobit regression

Author

Listed:
  • Jiaqiang Sun
  • Anita Binti Rosli
  • Adrian Daud

Abstract

The pharmaceutical industry plays a vital role in safeguarding public health and enhancing industrial competitiveness. However, pharmaceutical industry in China faces persistent challenges, including high pollution, insufficient innovation, and limited profit margins, which constrain its global competitiveness. The current researches on the operational efficiency were either from financial or innovation aspects-lacking a comprehensive assessment framework. Moreover, the impact of environments on efficiency relied on limited indicators and lacked in multicollinearity research. Finally, there was an absence of research on internal resource allocation affects operation efficiency. To fill this, this study aims to evaluate the current operation efficiency of the listed pharmaceutical enterprises in China from finance, innovation, and sustainability, and to reveal the influence environments on efficiency and the impact of the internal resource allocation on efficiency. To achieve these objectives, the study adopts a Three-stage Data Envelopment Analysis with undesirable outputs, integrated with Principal Component Analysis and Tobit regression, to comprehensively evaluate the operational efficiency of Chinese listed pharmaceutical enterprises over the ten-year period from 2013 to 2022 across the aforementioned three dimensions. The findings reveal generally low efficiency with significant regional disparities. North and Northwest China benefit from favorable environmental conditions, while Northeast China suffers from negative impacts. Improvements in external factors, such as innovation, living standards, labor supply, and openness level reduce costs, whereas internal uncontrollable factors, such as state-owned enterprise attributes, increase costs and suppress research and development. In terms of resource allocation, higher management expenses, and personnel allocations decrease efficiency, while increased sales expenditures and improved staff quality enhance efficiency. This study constructs a comprehensive framework for evaluating the operational efficiency and reveals the impact of external environments and internal resource allocation on efficiency. It provides empirical support for policymakers and operation managers seeking to improve the efficiency of the pharmaceutical companies.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiaqiang Sun & Anita Binti Rosli & Adrian Daud, 2025. "Efficiency analysis of listed pharmaceutical companies in China: A method combining three-stage DEA with undesirable output, PCA, and tobit regression," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(8), pages 1-33, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0329767
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329767
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0329767
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0329767&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0329767?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0329767. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.