IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2602.13879.html

When to Request Evidence?

Author

Listed:
  • Andres Espitia
  • Edwin Mu~noz-Rodr'iguez

Abstract

Appropriate decisions depend on information gathered beforehand, yet such information is often obtained through intermediaries with biased preferences. Motivated by settings such as testing and recertification in organ transplantation, we study the problem faced by a decision-maker who can only access costly information through an agent with misaligned preferences. In a dynamic framework with exogenous decision timing, we ask how requests for verifiable information (evidence) should be scheduled and their implications for the quality of attained choices. When the agent's incentives are ignored, evidence requests do not condition on previously reported information. However, such policies may be susceptible to strategic manipulation by the agent. We show that, in these cases, optimal requests should be biased: additional evidence is more likely to be sought when previous reports favor the agent's preferred outcome.

Suggested Citation

  • Andres Espitia & Edwin Mu~noz-Rodr'iguez, 2026. "When to Request Evidence?," Papers 2602.13879, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2602.13879
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.13879
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rui Ge & Clive Lennox, 2011. "Do acquirers disclose good news or withhold bad news when they finance their acquisitions using equity?," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 183-217, March.
    2. Schummer, James, 2021. "Influencing waiting lists," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    3. Elchanan Ben-Porath & Eddie Dekel & Barton L. Lipman, 2014. "Optimal Allocation with Costly Verification," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(12), pages 3779-3813, December.
    4. Genie, Mesfin G. & Nicoló, Antonio & Pasini, Giacomo, 2020. "The role of heterogeneity of patients’ preferences in kidney transplantation," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    5. Jason Snyder, 2010. "Gaming the Liver Transplant Market," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 26(3), pages 546-568.
    6. Nikhil Agarwal & Itai Ashlagi & Michael A. Rees & Paulo Somaini & Daniel Waldinger, 2021. "Equilibrium Allocations Under Alternative Waitlist Designs: Evidence From Deceased Donor Kidneys," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 89(1), pages 37-76, January.
    7. Chen, Yi, 2022. "Dynamic delegation with a persistent state," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 17(4), November.
    8. S. P. Kothari & Susan Shu & Peter D. Wysocki, 2009. "Do Managers Withhold Bad News?," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 47(1), pages 241-276, March.
    9. Weijie Zhong, 2022. "Optimal Dynamic Information Acquisition," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 90(4), pages 1537-1582, July.
    10. Guo, Yingni & Hörner, Johannes, 2020. "Dynamic Allocation without Money," TSE Working Papers 20-1133, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    11. Laura Doval & Federico Echenique Wanying Huang & Yi Xin, 2024. "Social Learning in Lung Transplant Decision," Papers 2411.10584, arXiv.org.
    12. Juanjuan Zhang, 2010. "The Sound of Silence: Observational Learning in the U.S. Kidney Market," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(2), pages 315-335, 03-04.
    13. Stacy Dickert-Conlin & Todd Elder & Keith Teltser, 2019. "Allocating Scarce Organs: How a Change in Supply Affects Transplant Waiting Lists and Transplant Recipients," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 11(4), pages 210-239, October.
    14. Ching-to Albert Ma, 1991. "Adverse Selection in Dynamic Moral Hazard," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 106(1), pages 255-275.
    15. Kevin Callison & Michael E. Darden & Keith F. Teltser, 2025. "Externalities from Medical Innovation: Evidence from Organ Transplantation," Journal of Political Economy Microeconomics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 3(4), pages 763-797.
    16. Arjada Bardhi, 2024. "Attributes: Selective Learning and Influence," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 92(2), pages 311-353, March.
    17. Yuliy Sannikov, 2008. "A Continuous-Time Version of the Principal-Agent Problem," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 75(3), pages 957-984.
    18. Rosar, Frank, 2017. "Test design under voluntary participation," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 632-655.
    19. Bushee, Brian J. & Leuz, Christian, 2005. "Economic consequences of SEC disclosure regulation: evidence from the OTC bulletin board," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 233-264, June.
    20. Jonathan Libgober, 2022. "False Positives and Transparency," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 14(2), pages 478-505, May.
    21. Nikhil Agarwal & Charles Hodgson & Paulo Somaini, 2025. "Choices and Outcomes in Assignment Mechanisms: The Allocation of Deceased Donor Kidneys," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 93(2), pages 395-438, March.
    22. Sun, Yeneng, 2006. "The exact law of large numbers via Fubini extension and characterization of insurable risks," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 126(1), pages 31-69, January.
    23. Xuanming Su & Stefanos Zenios, 2004. "Patient Choice in Kidney Allocation: The Role of the Queueing Discipline," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 6(4), pages 280-301, June.
    24. Jakša Cvitanić & Dylan Possamaï & Nizar Touzi, 2017. "Moral Hazard in Dynamic Risk Management," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(10), pages 3328-3346, October.
    25. Deneckere, Raymond & Severinov, Sergei, 2008. "Mechanism design with partial state verifiability," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 487-513, November.
    26. Howard, David H., 2002. "Why do transplant surgeons turn down organs?: A model of the accept/reject decision," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(6), pages 957-969, November.
    27. Chen, Ying & Oliver, Atara, 2023. "When to ask for an update: Timing in strategic communication," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Camilo Hernández & Dylan Possamaï, 2024. "Time‐inconsistent contract theory," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 1022-1085, July.
    2. Zahra Gharibi & Michael Hahsler, 2021. "A Simulation-Based Optimization Model to Study the Impact of Multiple-Region Listing and Information Sharing on Kidney Transplant Outcomes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-20, January.
    3. Camilo Hern'andez & Dylan Possamai, 2023. "Time-inconsistent contract theory," Papers 2303.01601, arXiv.org.
    4. Chen, Yi, 2022. "Dynamic delegation with a persistent state," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 17(4), November.
    5. Tinglong Dai & Ronghuo Zheng & Katia Sycara, 2020. "Jumping the Line, Charitably: Analysis and Remedy of Donor-Priority Rule," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(2), pages 622-641, February.
    6. Li, Mengling & Riyanto, Yohanes E. & Xu, Menghan, 2022. "Remedying adverse selection in donor-priority rule using freeze period: Theory and experiment," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 384-407.
    7. Hiroto Sato & Ryo Shirakawa, 2025. "Allocating Common-Value Goods," Papers 2512.20001, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2026.
    8. Beatrice Acciaio & Robert A. Crowell & Jakša Cvitanić, 2025. "A note on persistent private information," Mathematics and Financial Economics, Springer, volume 19, number 5, January.
    9. Romuald Élie & Emma Hubert & Thibaut Mastrolia & Dylan Possamaï, 2021. "Mean–field moral hazard for optimal energy demand response management," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 399-473, January.
    10. Curello, Gregorio & Sinander, Ludvig, 2025. "Screening for breakthroughs," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 20(4), November.
    11. Li, Mengling & Riyanto, Yohanes E. & Xu, Menghan, 2023. "Prioritized organ allocation rules under compatibility constraints," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 403-427.
    12. Mustafa Oğuz Afacan & Eray Cumbul, 2025. "Waitlist engineering in discrete object allocations with outside option," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 54(1), pages 1-22, June.
    13. Kastoryano, Stephen, 2024. "Biological, Behavioural and Spurious Selection on the Kidney Transplant Waitlist," IZA Discussion Papers 16995, IZA Network @ LISER.
    14. Zahra Gharibi & Hung T. Do & Michael Hahsler & Mehmet U. S. Ayvaci, 2025. "Optimal quality oversight in kidney transplantation and its impact on transplant centers’ waitlist management," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 381-410, September.
    15. Reinwald Patrick & Leitner Stephan & Wall Friederike, 2024. "Performance-Based Pay and Limited Information Access. An Agent-Based Model of the Hidden Action Problem," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 244(4), pages 381-423.
    16. Gregorio Curello & Ludvig Sinander, 2024. "Screening for Breakthroughs," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2024_562, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
    17. Nikhil Agarwal & Itai Ashlagi & Michael A. Rees & Paulo Somaini & Daniel Waldinger, 2021. "Equilibrium Allocations Under Alternative Waitlist Designs: Evidence From Deceased Donor Kidneys," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 89(1), pages 37-76, January.
    18. Cheng, Liubing & Chen, Yanyan & Liu, Feng, 2025. "How do dividends signal when they are highly volatile?," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    19. Tymofiy Mylovanov & Andriy Zapechelnyuk, 2017. "Optimal Allocation with Ex Post Verification and Limited Penalties," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 107(9), pages 2666-2694, September.
    20. Yeon-Koo Che, 2025. "Dynamic Market Design," Papers 2601.00155, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2602.13879. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.