IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uersib/277566.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Tillage Intensity and Conservation Cropping in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Claassen, Roger
  • Bowman, Maria
  • McFadden, Jonathan
  • Smith, David
  • Wallander, Steven

Abstract

Reducing tillage and increasing soil cover can enhance soil health. Conservation tillage, particularly no-till or strip-till, used in conjunction with soil cover practices (like conservation crop rotations and cover crops) can lead to a range of soil health benefits: improved agricultural productivity, greater drought resilience, and better environmental outcomes. This report uses field-level data to estimate tillage practice adoption based on soil disturbance as measured by absence of tillage operations (for no-till) and the Soil Tillage Intensity Rating (STIR, for mulch till). To gauge the intensity of tillage over time, we estimate the number of years no-till or strip-till are used over a 4-year period. Rates of adoption for practices that affect soil cover—including conservation crop rotations, cover crops, double cropping, fallowing, and residue harvest or grazing—are also estimated. The rates at which these practices are adopted in conjunction with no-till/strip-till are also estimated to illustrate interactions between tillage and practices that affect soil cover.

Suggested Citation

  • Claassen, Roger & Bowman, Maria & McFadden, Jonathan & Smith, David & Wallander, Steven, 2018. "Tillage Intensity and Conservation Cropping in the United States," Economic Information Bulletin 277566, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:uersib:277566
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.277566
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/277566/files/EIB-197.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.277566?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edward D. Perry & GianCarlo Moschini & David A. Hennessy, 2016. "Testing for Complementarity: Glyphosate Tolerant Soybeans and Conservation Tillage," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 98(3), pages 765-784.
    2. Horowitz, John K. & Ebel, Robert M. & Ueda, Kohei, 2010. ""No-Till" Farming Is a Growing Practice," Economic Information Bulletin 96636, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Wade, Tara & Pailler, Sharon & Claassen, Roger L., 2017. "Modeling No-Tillage Adoption by Corn and Soybean Producers: A Binary Panel Approach," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258556, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    4. Ding, Ya & Schoengold, Karina & Tadesse, Tsegaye, 2009. "The Impact of Weather Extremes on Agricultural Production Methods: Does Drought Increase Adoption of Conservation Tillage Practices?," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 34(3), pages 1-17, December.
    5. Kelly A. Davey & W. Hartley Furtan, 2008. "Factors That Affect the Adoption Decision of Conservation Tillage in the Prairie Region of Canada," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 56(3), pages 257-275, September.
    6. Wade, Tara & Claassen, Roger, 2017. "Modeling No-Till Adoption By Corn And Soybean Producers: Insights Into Sustained Adoption," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 49(2), pages 186-210, May.
    7. Borchers, Allison & Truex-Powell, Elizabeth & Wallander, Steven & Nickerson, Cynthia, 2014. "Multi-Cropping Practices: Recent Trends in Double-Cropping," Economic Information Bulletin 262122, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    8. Wade, Tara & Claassen, Roger & Wallander, Steven, 2015. "Conservation-Practice Adoption Rates Vary Widely by Crop and Region," Economic Information Bulletin 262111, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wallander, Steven & Bowman, Maria & Beeson, Peter & Claassen, Roger, 2017. "Farmers and Habits: The Challenge of Identifying the Sources of Persistence in Tillage Decisions," 2018 Allied Social Sciences Association (ASSA) Annual Meeting, January 5-7, 2018, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 266307, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. Wade, Tara & Kurkalova, Lyubov & Secchi, Silvia, 2016. "Modeling Field-Level Conservation Tillage Adoption with Aggregate Choice Data," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 41(2), May.
    3. Obembe, Oladipo S. & Wang, Tong & Shew, Aaron M., 2023. "Effect of Conservation Practice Adoption on Perceived Changes in Production Cost and Yield in South Dakota," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 48(2), May.
    4. Elizabeth Canales & Jason S. Bergtold & Jeffery R. Williams, 2020. "Conservation practice complementarity and timing of on‐farm adoption," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 51(5), pages 777-792, September.
    5. Wade, Tara & Kurkalova, Lyubov A. & Secchi, Silvia, 2012. "Using the logit model with aggregated choice data in estimation of Iowa corn farmers’ conservation tillage subsidies," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 124974, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    6. Chen, Le & Rejesus, Roderick M. & Aglasan, Serkan & Hagen, Stephen & Salas, William, 2022. "The Impact of No-Till Production on Agricultural Land Values in the US Midwest," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322445, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    7. David J. Pannell & Roger Claassen, 2020. "The Roles of Adoption and Behavior Change in Agricultural Policy," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(1), pages 31-41, March.
    8. Tran, Dat Q. & Kurkalova, Lyubov A., 2017. "Testing for complementarity between the use of continuous no-till and cover crops: an application of Entropy approach," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 259149, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    9. Che, Yuyuan & Rejesus, Roderick M. & Cavigelli, Michel A. & White, Kathryn E., 2022. "Long-Term Economic Impacts of No-Till Adoption," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322171, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    10. Chelsea Sutherland & Savannah Gleim & Stuart J. Smyth, 2021. "Correlating Genetically Modified Crops, Glyphosate Use and Increased Carbon Sequestration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-15, October.
    11. Wallander, Steven & Aillery, Marcel & Hellerstein, Daniel & Hand, Michael S., 2013. "The Role of Conservation Programs in Drought Risk Adaptation," Economic Research Report 262224, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    12. Sawadgo, Wendiam & Zhang, Wendong & Plastina, Alejandro, 2019. "What drives landowners’ conservation decisions? Evidence from Iowa," ISU General Staff Papers 201905230700001082, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    13. Bowman, Maria & Ferraro, Paul J. & Fuller, Kate Binzen & Gramig, Benjamin & Mosheim, Roberto & Njuki, Eric & Pratt, Bryan & Rejesus, Roderick & Rosenberg, Andrew, 2025. "Economic Outcomes of Soil Health and Conservation Practices on U.S. Cropland," Economic Research Report 358985, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    14. Jayson L. Lusk, 2017. "Evaluating the Policy Proposals of the Food Movement," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 39(3), pages 387-406.
    15. Rosenberg, Andrew B. & Wallander, Steven, 2020. "Conservation Practice Adoption and On-field Resource Concerns," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304563, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    16. Braeden Van Deynze & Scott M. Swinton & David A. Hennessy, 2022. "Are glyphosate‐resistant weeds a threat to conservation agriculture? Evidence from tillage practices in soybeans," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 104(2), pages 645-672, March.
    17. Schimmelpfennig, David & Ebel, Robert, 2016. "Sequential Adoption and Cost Savings from Precision Agriculture," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 41(01), pages 1-19, January.
    18. Fengxia Dong, 2022. "Cover Crops, Drought, Yield, and Risk: An Analysis of US Soybean Production," NBER Chapters, in: American Agriculture, Water Resources, and Climate Change, pages 241-267, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Hussain, Mir Zaman & Hamilton, Stephen K. & Bhardwaj, Ajay K. & Basso, Bruno & Thelen, Kurt D. & Robertson, G.P., 2019. "Evapotranspiration and water use efficiency of continuous maize and maize and soybean in rotation in the upper Midwest U.S," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 92-98.
    20. Adusumilli, Naveen & Wang, Hua & Dodla, Syam & Deliberto, Michael, 2020. "Estimating risk premiums for adopting no-till and cover crops management practices in soybean production system using stochastic efficiency approach," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uersib:277566. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.