IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uerseb/358890.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Prevalence of Competing and Complementary Claims on U.S. Food Product Packaging: A Case Study of Claims on Milk and Yogurt

Author

Listed:
  • Stewart, Hayden
  • Kuchler, Fred
  • Sweitzer, Megan

Abstract

Food products sold at retail stores may carry a variety of claims on packaging, including claims about human health (low fat), environmental stewardship (USDA Organic), and the types of inputs used in making the food (non-genetically modified organism or non-GMO). This study examines which claims appeared most frequently on fluid milk and yogurt product packaging, the number of claims that appeared on products, which ones were complementary (appearing together), and which ones competed for consumers’ attention (appearing on separate products). Emphasis is placed on claims related to farm production methods. Label Insight and Circana (formerly IRI) data for 2022 were used to conduct the study. Claims that a product is USDA Organic certified were found on 10.9 percent of fluid milk products and 8.9 percent of yogurt products. Organic products were also more likely to contain animal welfare and non-GMO claims than conventional fluid milk and yogurt products. Natural food claims were more common than organic claims and commonly appeared with hormone-free claims. Complementary claims fell into two groups: Verified claims that required farmers, suppliers, or retailers to incur some expenses appeared together, and claims that required little or no new activities or costs appeared together. The two groups rarely overlapped.

Suggested Citation

  • Stewart, Hayden & Kuchler, Fred & Sweitzer, Megan, 2025. "The Prevalence of Competing and Complementary Claims on U.S. Food Product Packaging: A Case Study of Claims on Milk and Yogurt," Economic Brief 358890, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uerseb:358890
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.358890
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/358890/files/EB-44.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.358890?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lim, Kar H. & Hu, Wuyang & Nayga, Rodolfo M., Jr., 2021. "Consumer Preference for Grass-Fed Beef: A Case of Food Safety Halo Effect," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 46(3), September.
    2. Darby, Michael R & Karni, Edi, 1973. "Free Competition and the Optimal Amount of Fraud," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 16(1), pages 67-88, April.
    3. Kuchler, Fred & Greene, Catherine & Bowman, Maria & Marshall, Kandice K. & Bovay, John & Lynch, Lori, 2017. "Beyond Nutrition and Organic Labels—30 Years of Experience With Intervening in Food Labels," Economic Research Report 291967, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. Wilson, Lacey & Lusk, Jayson L., 2020. "Consumer willingness to pay for redundant food labels," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    5. Maria Bowman & Kandice K. Marshall & Fred Kuchler & Lori Lynch, 2016. "Raised Without Antibiotics: Lessons from Voluntary Labeling of Antibiotic Use Practices in The Broiler Industry," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 98(2), pages 622-642.
    6. Gillespie, Jeffrey & Raszap Skorbiansky, Sharon & Law, Jonathan, 2024. "U.S. Certified Organic Dairy Production: Three Decades of Growth," Economic Research Report 346026, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Page, Elina T. & Short, Gianna & Sneeringer, Stacy & Bowman, Maria, 2021. "The Market for Chicken Raised Without Antibiotics, 2012–17," USDA Miscellaneous 315418, United States Department of Agriculture.
    2. F. Kuchler & M. Bowman & M. Sweitzer & C. Greene, 2020. "Evidence from Retail Food Markets That Consumers Are Confused by Natural and Organic Food Labels," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 43(2), pages 379-395, June.
    3. J. K. Pappalardo, 2022. "Economics of Consumer Protection: Contributions and Challenges in Estimating Consumer Injury and Evaluating Consumer Protection Policy," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 45(2), pages 201-238, June.
    4. Feser, Daniel & Runst, Petrik, 2015. "Energy efficiency consultants as change agents? Examining the reasons for EECs’ limited success," ifh Working Papers 1 (2015), Volkswirtschaftliches Institut für Mittelstand und Handwerk an der Universität Göttingen (ifh).
    5. Dhaval M. Dave, 2013. "Effects of Pharmaceutical Promotion: A Review and Assessment," NBER Working Papers 18830, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. David M. Waguespack & Robert Salomon, 2016. "Quality, Subjectivity, and Sustained Superior Performance at the Olympic Games," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(1), pages 286-300, January.
    7. Gu, Yiquan & Rasch, Alexander & Wenzel, Tobias, 2022. "Consumer salience and quality provision in (un)regulated public service markets," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    8. Eunae Jung & Hyungun Sung, 2017. "The Influence of the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Outbreak on Online and Offline Markets for Retail Sales," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-23, March.
    9. Ahlin, Christian & Kim, In Kyung & Kim, Kyoo il, 2021. "Who commits fraud? evidence from korean gas stations," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    10. Pim Heijnen, 2013. "Informative advertising by an environmental group," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 108(3), pages 249-272, April.
    11. Andrew G. Sutherland & Matthias Uckert & Felix W. Vetter, 2024. "Occupational Licensing and Minority Participation in Professional Labor Markets," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 62(2), pages 453-503, May.
    12. Cai, Dapeng & Jørgensen, Jan Guldager, 2017. "Mutual Recognition for Sale: International Bargaining over Product Standards," Discussion Papers on Economics 1/2017, University of Southern Denmark, Department of Economics.
    13. Erwan Quéinnec, 2012. "Les organisations sans but lucratif repondent- elles à une demande de biens de confiance ? Le cas des services de prise en charge," Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 122(1), pages 67-87.
    14. Jianhua Wang & Jiaye Ge & Yuting Ma, 2018. "Urban Chinese Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Pork with Certified Labels: A Discrete Choice Experiment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-14, February.
    15. Jhunjhunwala, Tanushree, 2021. "Searching to avoid regret: An experimental evidence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 298-319.
    16. repec:cgr:cgsser:03-13 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Schweizer, T.S., 2002. "Managing interactions between technological and stylistic innovation in the media industries, insights from the introduction of ebook technology in the publishing industry," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2002-16-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    18. Koji Domon & Alessandro Melcarne & Giovanni B. Ramello, 2022. "Fake & original: the case of Japanese food in Southeast Asian countries," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 54(2), pages 327-347, October.
    19. Pearson, David, 2003. "Australia Fresh fruits and vegetables: Why do so many of them remain unbranded?," Australasian Agribusiness Review, University of Melbourne, Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 11.
    20. Xujin Pu & Huanzhen Zhang, 2016. "Voluntary Certification of Agricultural Products in Competitive Markets: The Consideration of Boundedly Rational Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-13, September.
    21. repec:osf:socarx:ay8rq_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Marco Costanigro & Yuko Onozaka, 2020. "A Belief‐Preference Model of Choice for Experience and Credence Goods," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(1), pages 70-95, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uerseb:358890. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.