IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01367936.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Les Organisations Sans But Lucratif Repondent- Elles À Une Demande De Biens De Confiance ? Le Cas Des Services De Prise En Charge

Author

Listed:
  • Erwan Queinnec

Abstract

La théorie de l'échec du contrat (CFT) pare le statut sans but lucratif d'une fonction discriminante de garantie apportée aux agents privés demandeurs de «biens de confiance », ces derniers donnant prise à d'insurmontables asymétries information- nelles. Quoique stimulante, la CFT peine cependant à expliquer la coexistence des firmes et des organisations sans but lucratif sur leurs secteurs d'offre communs : ser- vices de prise en charge, soins et éducation. Elle appelle donc une discussion théorique visant à délimiter son périmètre d'application. En se limitant au cas des services de prise en charge, l'examen des travaux théoriques et empiriques arrimés à la CFT conduit à conclure (a) que les biens de confiance posent effectivement un problème radical d'asymétrie d'information (sous certaines conditions), (b) que la théorie sures- time (sous estime) la capacité du statut sans but lucratif à y répondre (la capacité des firmes à susciter de la confiance) et (c) qu'en conséquence, la CFT n'est réellement prescriptive qu'à propos des « consommateurs vulnérables non monitorés » et à condi- tion de doter les organisations sans but lucratif d'une signalétique complémentaire à celle de leur statut juridique.

Suggested Citation

  • Erwan Queinnec, 2012. "Les Organisations Sans But Lucratif Repondent- Elles À Une Demande De Biens De Confiance ? Le Cas Des Services De Prise En Charge," Post-Print hal-01367936, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01367936
    DOI: 10.3917/redp.217.0067
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01367936
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01367936/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3917/redp.217.0067?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark G. Duggan, 2000. "Hospital Ownership and Public Medical Spending," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 115(4), pages 1343-1373.
    2. Chou, Shin-Yi, 2002. "Asymmetric information, ownership and quality of care: an empirical analysis of nursing homes," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 293-311, March.
    3. Jeffrey P. Ballou, 2005. "An Examination of the Presence of Ownership Effects in Mixed Markets," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 21(1), pages 228-255, April.
    4. Anheier, Helmut K., 2000. "Managing non-profit organisations: towards a new approach," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 29022, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. George A. Akerlof, 1970. "The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 84(3), pages 488-500.
    6. Avner BEN-NER & Theresa VAN HOOMISSEN, 1991. "Nonprofit Organizations In The Mixed Economy," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(4), pages 519-550, October.
    7. Darby, Michael R & Karni, Edi, 1973. "Free Competition and the Optimal Amount of Fraud," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 16(1), pages 67-88, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Erwan Queinnec, 2011. "Do Not-For-Profit Organizations Meet A Demand For Trust Goods ? A Reappraisal Of The Contract Failure Theory [Resoudre Un Probleme D’Asymetrie D’Information En S’Abstenant De Faire Du Profit : Les ," Working Papers hal-01367931, HAL.
    2. Ben-Ner Avner & Karaca-Mandic Pinar & Ren Ting, 2012. "Ownership and Quality in Markets with Asymmetric Information: Evidence from Nursing Homes," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 12(1), pages 1-33, October.
    3. Chen, Yong & Mak, Barry & Li, Zhou, 2013. "Quality deterioration in package tours: The interplay of asymmetric information and reputation," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 43-54.
    4. repec:hal:cepnwp:hal-01367931 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Xujin Pu & Huanzhen Zhang, 2016. "Voluntary Certification of Agricultural Products in Competitive Markets: The Consideration of Boundedly Rational Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-13, September.
    6. Marco Costanigro & Yuko Onozaka, 2020. "A Belief‐Preference Model of Choice for Experience and Credence Goods," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(1), pages 70-95, February.
    7. Fabienne Chameroy & Jean-Louis Chandon, 2011. "Are All Labels Ethical? [Les labels sont-ils tous éthiques ?]," Post-Print hal-02092068, HAL.
    8. Feser, Daniel & Runst, Petrik, 2016. "Energy efficiency consultants as change agents? Examining the reasons for EECs’ limited success," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 309-317.
    9. William A. Masters & Diakalia Sanogo, 2002. "Welfare Gains from Quality Certification of Infant Foods: Results from a Market Experiment in Mali," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 84(4), pages 974-989.
    10. Schulze, Holger & Albersmeier, Friederike & Spiller, Achim & Jahn, Gabriele, 2006. "Audit risk factors in certification: How can risk-oriented audits improve the quality of certification standards?," 98th Seminar, June 29-July 2, 2006, Chania, Crete, Greece 10108, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    11. Yokessa, Maïmouna & Marette, Stéphan, 2019. "A Review of Eco-labels and their Economic Impact," International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, now publishers, vol. 13(1-2), pages 119-163, April.
    12. Lindbeck, A. & Wilkstrom, S., 1999. "ICT and Household-Firm Relations," Papers 677, Stockholm - International Economic Studies.
    13. Fabrice Etilé & Sabrina Teyssier, 2012. "Signaling Corporate Social Responsibility: Third-Party Certification vs. Brands," PSE Working Papers halshs-00736551, HAL.
    14. Latvala, Terhi & Kola, Jukka, 2002. "Demand for and Value of Credence Characteristics: Case Beef," 2002 International Congress, August 28-31, 2002, Zaragoza, Spain 24841, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. Grolleau, Gilles & Caswell, Julie A., 2006. "Interaction Between Food Attributes in Markets: The Case of Environmental Labeling," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 31(3), pages 1-14, December.
    16. Kyoungrae Jung & Daniel Polsky, 2014. "Competition And Quality In Home Health Care Markets," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(3), pages 298-313, March.
    17. Etilé, Fabrice & Teyssier, Sabrina, 2013. "Corporate social responsibility and the economics of consumer social responsibility," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement (RAEStud), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 94(2).
    18. Magali Aubert & Geoffroy Enjolras, 2016. "Do short food supply chains go hand in hand with environment-friendly practices? An analysis of French farms," International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(2), pages 189-213.
    19. Steinrücken, Torsten, 2001. "Der Markt für politische Zitronen," Ilmenau Economics Discussion Papers 20, Ilmenau University of Technology, Institute of Economics.
    20. Schneider, Tim & Bizer, Kilian, 2017. "Building trust by qualification in a market for expert services," University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics 309, University of Goettingen, Department of Economics.
    21. Tankam, Chloe & Vollet, Dominique & Aznar, Olivier, 2019. "Entre asymétrie d’information et incertitude partagée. Analyse des systèmes de certification biologique pour le marché domestique kenyan," Économie rurale, French Society of Rural Economics (SFER Société Française d'Economie Rurale), vol. 369(July-Sept).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01367936. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.