IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ucdavw/225815.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Two-Stage Agricultural Import Demand Models: Theory And Applications

Author

Listed:
  • Carter, Colin
  • Green, Richard
  • Pick, Daniel

Abstract

The Armington trade model distinguishes commodities by country of origin and import demand is determined in a separable two-step procedure. The Armington framework has been applied to numerous international agricultural markets with the objective of modelling import demand. The purpose of this paper is to test the Armington assumptions of homotheticity and separability with data from the international wheat market. The empirical results overwhelmingly reject these assumptions. This has important implications for international trade modelling.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Carter, Colin & Green, Richard & Pick, Daniel, 1988. "Two-Stage Agricultural Import Demand Models: Theory And Applications," Working Papers 225815, University of California, Davis, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ucdavw:225815
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.225815
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/225815/files/agecon-ucdavis-88-7.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.225815?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Blanciforti, Laura & Green, Richard, 1983. "An Almost Ideal Demand System Incorporating Habits: An Analysis of Expenditures on Food and Aggregate Commodity Groups," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 65(3), pages 511-515, August.
    2. Deaton, Angus S & Muellbauer, John, 1980. "An Almost Ideal Demand System," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 70(3), pages 312-326, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ito, Shoichi & Chen, Dean T. & F. Peterson, E. Wesley, 1989. "A Multi-ces and Non-Homothetic Approach for Agricultural Trade Analysis: A Modified Armington Procedure," Staff Reports 257925, Texas A&M University, Agricultural and Food Policy Center.
    2. Ito, Shoichi & Chen, Dean T. & F. Peterson, E. Wesley, 1989. "Modeling Trade Flows and Market Shares: A Modified Armington Procedure for Rice," Staff Reports 257923, Texas A&M University, Agricultural and Food Policy Center.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aborisade, Olumide & Carpio, Carlos, 2017. "Household Demand for Meat in Nigeria," 2017 Annual Meeting, February 4-7, 2017, Mobile, Alabama 252839, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    2. Md Abu Bakr Siddique & Md Abdus Salam & Mohammad Chhiddikur Rahman, 2020. "Estimating the Demand Elasticity of Rice in Bangladesh: An Application of the AIDS Model," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 10(3), pages 721-728.
    3. Hassan, Daniel & Monier-Dilhan, Sylvette, 2009. "Mesure des changements de consommation suite à une segmentation de l’offre : l’exemple de la tomate fraîche," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement (RAEStud), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 90(3).
    4. Mehmet Şahinli & Halil Fidan, 2012. "Estimation of food demand in Turkey: method of an almost ideal demand system," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 653-663, February.
    5. Lee, Chang-Buhm & Koo, Won W. & Yang, Seung-Ryong, 1992. "Demand for Meat in Korea: Estimation and Test for Structural Change," Agricultural Economics Reports 23434, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    6. Lee, Min-Yang A. & Thunberg, Eric M., 2012. "An Inverse Demand System for New England Groundfish: Welfare Analysis of the Transition to Catch Share Management," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 123879, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    7. Hongbo Liu & Kevin A. Parton & Zhang-Yue Zhou & Rod Cox, 2009. "At-home meat consumption in China: an empirical study ," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 53(4), pages 485-501, October.
    8. Galarraga, Ibon & González-Eguino, Mikel & Markandya, Anil, 2011. "Willingness to pay and price elasticities of demand for energy-efficient appliances: Combining the hedonic approach and demand systems," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(S1), pages 66-74.
    9. Lars-Erik Borge & Jørn Rattsø, 1998. "Demographic Shift, Relative Costs and the Allocation of Local Public Consumption in Norway," Chapters, in: Jørn Rattsø (ed.), Fiscal Federalism and State–local Finance, chapter 5, pages 71-92, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Mona Aghabeygi & Filippo Arfini, 2020. "Assessing the Net Import Welfare Impacts of the Rising Global Price of Food in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-10, February.
    11. Grace Chua Ee Lin, 2003. "Food and Cross-Country Income Comparisons," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 03-14, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    12. Liu, Hongbo & Parton, Kevin A. & Zhou, Zhang-Yue & Cox, Rod, 2009. "At-home meat consumption in China: an empirical study," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 53(4), pages 1-17.
    13. Kenneth W. Clements & E. A. Selvanathan & Saroja Selvanathan, 1992. "Henri Theil’s Contributions to Demand Analysis," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Ronald Bewley & Tran Hoa (ed.), Contributions to Consumer Demand and Econometrics, chapter 5, pages 74-104, Palgrave Macmillan.
    14. Regmi, Madhav & Featherstone, Allen M., 2017. "Farm Households Consumption Heterogeneity And Rural Business Dynamics," 2017 Annual Meeting, February 4-7, 2017, Mobile, Alabama 252755, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    15. Eugene Jones & Cuma Akbay & Brian Roe & Wen S. Chern, 2003. "Analyses of consumers' dietary behavior: An application of the AIDS model to supermarket scanner data," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(2), pages 203-221.
    16. Md. Abu Bakr Siddique & Md. Abdus Salam & Mohammad Chhiddikur Rahman, 2020. "Estimating the Demand Elasticity of Rice in Bangladesh: An Application of the AIDS Model," Asian Journal of Agriculture and rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 10(3), pages 721-728, October.
    17. Paul Cashin, 1991. "A Model Of The Disaggregated Demand For Meat In Australia," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 35(3), pages 263-283, December.
    18. Arabatzis, Garyfallos & Klonaris, Stathis, 2009. "An analysis of Greek wood and wood product imports: Evidence from the linear quadratic aids," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 266-270, July.
    19. Md Abu Bakr Siddique & Md Abdus Salam & Mohammad Chhiddikur Rahman, 2020. "Estimating the Demand Elasticity of Rice in Bangladesh: An Application of the AIDS Model," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 10(3), pages 721-728.
    20. Poray, Michael C. & Foster, Kenneth A. & Dorfman, Jeffrey H., 2000. "Measuring An Almost Ideal Demand System With Generalized Flexible Least Squares," 2000 Annual meeting, July 30-August 2, Tampa, FL 21796, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Demand and Price Analysis;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ucdavw:225815. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/daucdus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.