IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/gewi07/7592.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Ist Eine Reduzierung Des Pflanzenschutzmitteleinsatzes Im Freilandgemüsebau Möglich? Ergebnisse Eines Bioökonomischen Simulationsmodells

Author

Listed:
  • Dirksmeyer, Walter

Abstract

In field vegetable production pesticide a levels are very high although pest control technologies are known, which require much less pesticides than the commonly applied control technologies. A stochastic bio-economic simulation model is used to determine the net return derived from the application of different pest control technologies in carrot, leek and onion production. Following the concept of stochastic dominance efficient technologies can be identified. Results reveal that it is possible to reduce pesticide use levels in field vegetable production if alternative control technologies are applied. This is possible without losses in net return on farm level and without increasing risk of field vegetable production. Der Einsatz von chemisch-synthetischen Pflanzenschutzmitteln ist im Freilandgemüsebau sehr hoch. Obwohl Pflanzenschutzverfahren bekannt sind, die deutlich weniger PSM benöti-gen, als dies bei den Standardverfahren der Fall ist, werden sie häufig nur von einem kleinen Kreis der Produzenten angewandt. Mit Hilfe eines stochastischen bioökonomischen Simulationsmodells wird die Verteilung des Nettoertrages ermittelt, die von der Anwendung verschie-dener in der Produktion von Möhren, Porree und Zwiebeln eingesetzter Pflanzenschutzverfah-ren zu erwarten sind. Unter Verwendung des Konzeptes der stochastischen Dominanz können effiziente Verfahren identifiziert werden. Die Simulationsergebnisse zeigen, dass es durch den Einsatz alternativer Pflanzenschutzverfahren im Freilandgemüsebau möglich ist, die PSM-Einsatzmengen zu reduzieren, ohne betriebswirtschaftliche Einbußen oder ein erhöhtes Risiko in Kauf nehmen zu müssen.

Suggested Citation

  • Dirksmeyer, Walter, 2007. "Ist Eine Reduzierung Des Pflanzenschutzmitteleinsatzes Im Freilandgemüsebau Möglich? Ergebnisse Eines Bioökonomischen Simulationsmodells," 47th Annual Conference, Weihenstephan, Germany, September 26-28, 2007 7592, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:gewi07:7592
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://purl.umn.edu/7592
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pannell, David J., 1991. "Pests and pesticides, risk and risk aversion," Agricultural Economics of Agricultural Economists, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 5(4), August.
    2. Alfons Oude Lansink & Alain Carpentier, 2001. "Damage Control Productivity: An Input Damage Abatement Approach," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(3), pages 11-22.
    3. Melanie Blackwell & Pagoulatos Angelos, 1992. "The Econometrics of Damage Control," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 74(4), pages 1040-1044.
    4. J. C. Headley, 1968. "Estimating the Productivity of Agricultural Pesticides," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 50(1), pages 13-23.
    5. Pretty, J. N. & Brett, C. & Gee, D. & Hine, R. E. & Mason, C. F. & Morison, J. I. L. & Raven, H. & Rayment, M. D. & van der Bijl, G., 2000. "An assessment of the total external costs of UK agriculture," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 113-136, August.
    6. Atanu Saha & C. Richard Shumway & Arthur Havenner, 1997. "The Economics and Econometrics of Damage Control," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 79(3), pages 773-785.
    7. de Buck, A. J. & Schoorlemmer, H. B. & Wossink, G. A. A. & Janssens, S. R. M., 1999. "Risks of post-emergence weed control strategies in sugar beet: development and application of a bio-economic model," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 59(3), pages 283-299, March.
    8. Oriade, Caleb A. & Dillon, Carl R., 1997. "Developments in biophysical and bioeconomic simulation of agricultural systems: a review," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 17(1), pages 45-58, October.
    9. David Sunding & Joshua Zivin, 2000. "Insect Population Dynamics, Pesticide Use, and Farmworker Health," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 82(3), pages 527-540.
    10. Bor, Yunchang Jeffrey, 1995. "Optimal pest management and economic threshold," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 113-133.
    11. Jean-Daniel M. Saphores, 2000. "The Economic Threshold with a Stochastic Pest Population: A Real Options Approach," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 82(3), pages 541-555.
    12. Swinton, Scott M. & Williams, Mollie B., 1998. "Assessing The Economic Impacts Of Integrated Pest Management: Lessons From The Past, Directions For The Future," Staff Papers 11636, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    13. Alain Carpentier & Robert D. Weaver, 1997. "Damage Control Productivity: Why Econometrics Matters," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 79(1), pages 47-61.
    14. Katherine H. Reichelderfer & Filmore E. Bender, 1979. "Application of a Simulative Approach to Evaluating Alternative Methods for the Control of Agricultural Pests," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 61(2), pages 258-267.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:gewi07:7592. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/gewisea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.