IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ersrdr/334712.html

Displaced Workers: Differences in Nonmetro and Metro Experience in the Mid-1990s

Author

Listed:
  • Hamrick, Karen S.

Abstract

During 1995-97, 3.4 million workers were displaced from their jobs, of whom 500,000 (15 percent) were nonmetro workers. This report examines the displaced workers' experience in metro and nonmetro areas using survey and administrative data. Although nonmetro workers were less likely to be displaced than metro workers, they had a lower probability of finding employment after losing their jobs. Nonmetro workers were less likely to be covered by legislation providing advance notice of job loss and providing retirement and health insurance benefits after being laid off. A variety of programs are available to assist displaced workers in nonmetro areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Hamrick, Karen S., 2001. "Displaced Workers: Differences in Nonmetro and Metro Experience in the Mid-1990s," Rural Development Research Reports 334712, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ersrdr:334712
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.334712
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/334712/files/RDRR92.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.334712?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ersrdr:334712. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.